BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó





           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |                                                                 |
          |         SENATE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES AND WATER         |
          |                   Senator Fran Pavley, Chair                    |
          |                    2013-2014 Regular Session                    |
          |                                                                 |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

          BILL NO: AB 2636                   HEARING DATE: June 24, 2014
          AUTHOR: Gatto                      URGENCY: No
          VERSION: June 19, 2014             CONSULTANT: Dennis O'Connor
          DUAL REFERRAL: No                  FISCAL: Yes
          SUBJECT: CalConserve Water Use Efficiency Revolving Fund.
          
          BACKGROUND AND EXISTING LAW
          One of the bills in the 2009 water package was SBX7 7  
          (Steinberg).  That bill, sometimes known as the 20x2020 bill,  
          requires the state to achieve 20% reduction in urban per capita  
          water use by December 31, 2020.  The bill provided specific  
          methods for urban water suppliers to meet the 20% reduction  
          goal.

          SBX7 7 (Steinberg) also required agricultural water suppliers to  
          adopt a volumetric water pricing system and to implement locally  
          cost effective and technically feasible water use efficiency  
          measures, as specified.

          PROPOSED LAW
          This bill would establish the CalConserve Water Use Efficiency  
          Revolving Fund (Fund) as follows: 
           The purpose of the Fund is to provide monies to make at or  
            below market loans for water use efficiency projects. 
           The Department of Water Resources (DWR) would administer the  
            fund.
           DWR would provide loans to water agencies, which would then  
            make loans to their customers.

          The Fund would be endowed as follows:
           Any remaining Proposition 13 agricultural water use efficiency  
            funds would be transferred to the Fund.
           The Legislature would be authorized to appropriate moneys in  
            the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund for water-use efficiency  
            projects under the CalConserve Water Use Efficiency Revolving  
            Loan Program that reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
           DWR would be authorized to enter into an agreement with the  
                                                                      1







            federal government for federal contributions to the Fund if  
            both of the following conditions are met:
             (1)  The state identifies any required matching funds.
             (2)  The department is prepared to commit to the expenditure  
               of any minimum amount in the Fund in the manner required by  
               the federal government.

          Moneys in the Fund would be used for the following purposes:
           Loans that meet all of the following requirements:
             (1)  Are made at or below market interest rates.
             (2)  Require annual payments of principal and any interest,  
               with repayment commencing not later than one year after  
               loan funding and full amortization not later than 20 years  
               after loan funding. Full amortization for loans to  
               disadvantaged communities shall not be later than 25 years  
               after loan funding.
             (3)  Require the loan recipient to establish an acceptable  
               dedicated source of revenue for repayment of a loan.
           To guarantee, or purchase insurance for, local obligations if  
            that action would improve credit market access or reduce  
            interest rates.
           As a source of revenue or security for the payment of  
            principal and interest on revenue or general obligation bonds  
            issued by the state, if the proceeds of the sale of those  
            bonds will be deposited in the Fund.
           To earn interest.
           Technical assistance.
           For payment of the reasonable costs of administering the Fund,  
            not to exceed 4 percent of the fund.
           Grants, principal forgiveness, negative interest rates, and  
            any other type of, or variation on, the types of assistance  
            described in this section that is authorized by a federal  
            capitalization grant deposited in the Fund to the extent  
            authorized and funded by that federal capitalization grant.

          ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT
          According to the Author, "Water scarcity has long been a concern  
          for Californians, particularly for those from the Southern and  
          Inland regions of the state. The state is committed to reducing  
          urban per capita water use 20% by 2020 (Water Code §10608.20).  
          With the state in a deep drought this year, cities and counties  
          across the state are working even harder to develop innovative  
          water solutions to compensate for shrinking snow packs and  
          long-term declines in precipitation."

          "The State Water Resources Control Board and the Department of  
          Public Health both administer state revolving loan programs that  
                                                                      2







          are used for specified water treatment projects and to address  
          water system deficiencies to ensure access to safe water.  There  
          is no similar loan program to facilitate water-use efficiency on  
          commercial, industrial, or residential properties."

          "AB 2636 authorizes the Department of Water Resources to  
          administer a state revolving fund program that will (1) be a  
          self-renewing source of funding for water-use efficiency,  
          available to the public between water bonds, (2) be a means of  
          leveraging local investment in water-use efficiency, including  
          investments by private entities, and (3) provide state financial  
          support to help cities, counties, urban and  agricultural water  
          providers, and recycled water providers improving water  
          efficiency throughout the state and meet California's water-use  
          reduction goals."

          ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: None

          COMMENTS 
           Third Time's Charmed?   This bill is similar to AB 2011 (Gatto)  
          and AB 1349 (Gatto) both of which would also have created  
          CalConserve.  However, AB 2011 differed in that it allocated an  
          anticipatory $50 million from the Safe, Clean, and Reliable  
          Drinking Water Supply Act of 2012 (Water Bond), if that act were  
          to pass.  It did not.  The Water Bond was moved to the 2014  
          ballot.  Both AB 2011 and AB 1349 were held in the Assembly  
          Appropriations Committee pending firmer identification of  
          potential funding sources.

           New Frontier For DWR  .  It has been decades since DWR has  
          administered a revolving loan account.  DWR would likely seek  
          assistance from the Department of Finance and other agencies  
          that manage revolving loan accounts.  Setting up the appropriate  
          financing mechanisms could take some time and money.

           Accounting May Be Challenging.   The bill proposes to endow the  
          Fund with bond funds, Cap-and-trade funds, and federal funds.   
          Each of those funding sources has limits on how those monies may  
          be used.  DWR may need to establish separate subaccounts or use  
          some other accounting mechanism to ensure each of those funds  
          are used consistent with their underlying requirements.   
          Accounting requirements for local agencies receiving loans from  
          the Fund may similarly be complicated.

           Actions in Previous Committees.   This bill was heard in the  
          Senate Environmental Quality Committee on June 18, 2014.   
          Concerns were raised regarding whether the bill provided for a  
                                                                      3







          strong and clear nexus to greenhouse gas emission reductions, in  
          order to justify the use of monies from the Greenhouse Gas  
          Reduction Fund.  The Committee members requested an amendment be  
          taken to address this issue by requiring ARB, in consultation  
          with DWR, to submit findings and report those findings to the  
          Legislature, on how all operational aspects of the program  
          result in greenhouse gas emission reductions.  The bill passed  
          out with a motion to pass the bill, as amended, and re-refer to  
          the Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee on a vote of  
          6-0.

           Other Funding.   As noted above, the bill proposes to endow the  
          Fund, in part, by transferring the Proposition 13 agricultural  
          water use efficiency funds.  According to the DWR, a $14.9  
          million reappropriation through a Spring Finance Letter and a  
          $17.3 million appropriation through May Revise depleted the fund  
          entirely.

           Technical Amendments Needed.   Staff have identified a number of  
          technical amendments for this bill which are described below:

          SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS 
          (1)Add a definition of "on-bill financing."
          (2)In §81030 (a), make clear, that the loans are to local  
            agencies.
          (3)In §81030 (f), make clear that it is DWR's administrative  
            costs that are limited to 4 percent.
          (4)In §81033, make clear that the prohibition on a local agency  
            using the funds for administrative costs apply to the local  
            agency's administrative costs.

          
          SUPPORT
          Association of California Water Agencies
          California Landscape Contractors Association
          California Municipal Utilities Association
          City of Burbank
          East Bay Municipal Utility District
          Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
          Nexus eWater
          San Diego County Water Agency
          Sierra Club California
          Sonoma County Water Agency

          OPPOSITION
          None Received

                                                                      4






















































                                                                      5