BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó






           SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE       BILL NO: ab 2752
          SENATOR MARK DESAULNIER, CHAIRMAN              AUTHOR:  asm trans
                                                         VERSION: 6/19/14
          Analysis by:  Erin Riches                      FISCAL:  yes
          Hearing date:  June 26, 2014



          SUBJECT:

          Transportation omnibus bill

          DESCRIPTION:

          This bill makes non-controversial changes to sections of law  
          relating to transportation.

          ANALYSIS:

          According to the Legislative Analyst, the cost of producing a  
          bill in 2001-02 was $17,890.  By combining multiple matters into  
          one bill, the Legislature can make minor changes to law in the  
          most cost-effective manner.

           This bill  includes the following provisions:

           California State Transportation Agency (Sections 1 and 2).   
            Existing law, effective July 1, 2013, replaces the Business,  
            Transportation, and Housing Agency with the California State  
            Transportation Agency and the California Business, Consumer  
            Services, and Housing Agency.  This bill replaces outdated  
            references to the Secretary of the Business, Transportation,  
            and Housing Agency with references to the Secretary of  
            Transportation.  [Submitted by the Assembly Transportation  
            Committee]

           Local public works contracts (Section 3).  When local agencies  
            voluntarily adopt the standards and procedures of the Uniform  
            Public Construction Cost Accounting Act (UPCCA), they can use  
            higher limits for their contracts.  Up until 2011, statute  
            authorized counties that adopted UPCCA to use an alternative  
            procurement procedure authorizing a county road commissioner,  
            or a registered civil engineer under the direction of the  
            county transportation director, to supervise or direct any  
            work upon county highways.  AB 720 (Hall), Chapter 683,  
            Statutes of 2011, imposes a cap on the amount of work counties  




          AB 2752 (ASM TRANS)                                    Page 2

                                                                       


            can perform using alternative procurement procedures.  In  
            implementing AB 720, stakeholders have identified four issues  
            for the Legislature to clarify.  This bill clarifies that  
            counties shall calculate their eligible force account work on  
            a fiscal year basis; clarifies that counties shall use the  
            State Controller's Office Annual Streets and Roads Report as  
            of March 1 of each year to set the cap for the following  
            fiscal year; clarifies that counties may comply with the  
            requirement to "declare work" using the alternative procedure  
            in three ways, namely, listing anticipated projects in the  
            annual budget, listing anticipated projects for the fiscal  
            year, and/or on a project-by-project basis; and enacts  
            language provided by Assemblymember Hall in a letter to the  
            Daily Journal clarifying that force account work to facilitate  
            private contracts does not count toward the cap.  [Submitted  
            by the California State Association of Counties Construction  
            Industry Force Account Council]
           Orange County Transit District (OCTD) taxes (Section 4).  The  
            California Constitution allows special districts to impose  
            only special taxes - defined as any tax imposed for specific  
            purposes - but not general taxes.  The constitution requires a  
            local government to obtain two-thirds voter approval in order  
            to impose, extend, or increase any special tax.  A statute  
            enacted prior to the constitutional two-thirds voter  
            requirement authorizes OCTD to impose transaction and use  
            taxes by adopting an ordinance approved by a majority vote of  
            the electorate.  Because transit districts are special  
            districts, the constitutional requirement of two-thirds  
            approval for a special tax supersedes this majority vote  
            requirement.  This bill updates the vote requirement to  
            two-thirds for OCTD's transaction and use taxes.   [Submitted  
            by the Senate Governance and Finance Committee]

           Vote requirement for special taxes (Section 5).  The  
            California Constitution requires a local government to obtain  
            two-thirds voter approval in order to impose, extend, or  
            increase any special tax.  State law authorizes some local  
            governments to adopt an ordinance imposing a motor vehicle  
            fuel tax.  A statute enacted prior to the constitutional  
            two-thirds voter requirement authorizes a local government to  
            impose a fuel tax with majority vote approval.  This bill  
            updates the vote requirement to two-thirds for local fuel  
            taxes and updates an outdated reference to the Los Angeles  
            County Transportation Commission, which is now named the Los  
            Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Commission. [Submitted by  
            the Senate Governance and Finance Committee]




          AB 2752 (ASM TRANS)                                    Page 3

                                                                       



           Highway relinquishment cleanup (Sections 6, 7, 8, 9).   
            Existing law relinquishes numerous portions of the state  
            highway system to cities and counties.  This bill updates the  
            statutory descriptions of Highway 5, Route 34, Route 55, and  
            Route 232 to reflect the fact that the state Department of  
            Transportation (Caltrans) has relinquished portions of these  
            highways to local agencies.  [Submitted by Caltrans]

           Technical correction to the Streets and Highways Code (Section  
            10).  Section 721 of the Streets and Highways Code authorizes  
            Caltrans to remove certain highway encroachments.  This bill  
            corrects a cross-referencing error in this section.   
            [Submitted by the California Department of Transportation]

           Technical corrections to the Vehicle Code (Sections 11, 14,  
            15).  Section 2403.5 of the Vehicle Code authorizes the  
            Commissioner of the California Highway Patrol to enter into  
            interstate agreements with neighboring states.  Section 15210  
            of the Vehicle Code provides definitions relating to  
            commercial driver's licenses.  Section 27360 of the Vehicle  
            Code relates to child safety passenger restraints.  This bill  
            corrects cross-referencing error in these sections.   
            [Submitted by the California Highway Patrol]

           Legacy license plate cleanup (Section 12).  Existing law (AB  
            1658 [Gatto], Chapter 720, Statutes of 2012) establishes a  
            legacy license plate program requiring the Department of Motor  
            Vehicles (DMV) to issue specialized license plates that  
            replicate the look of California's license plates from the  
            past.  This bill clarifies that an applicant can either be  
            assigned a plate number by DMV or request a personalized  
            plate, and includes cleanup language related to fees for  
            personalized plates.  [Submitted by the DMV]

           State Controller's Office (SCO) report requirement (Section  
            13).  Existing law (SB 71 [Leno], Chapter 728, Statutes of  
            2012) eliminates, consolidates, or streamlines various  
            reporting requirements for state agencies and departments,  
            including an SCO report summarizing the annual revenues and  
            expenditures of each county that has adopted a local vehicle  
            registration surcharge to fund fingerprint programs.  The  
            deletion of this report requirement was accidentally chaptered  
            out by a bill that was subsequently signed by the Governor,  
            but then legislative staff indicated a desire to preserve the  
            report requirement.  This bill allows SCO to post on its  




          AB 2752 (ASM TRANS)                                    Page 4

                                                                       


            website, instead of submitting to the Legislature, an annual  
            summary of revenues and expenditures for each county that has  
            adopted a local vehicle registration surcharge to fund  
            fingerprint programs.  [Submitted by SCO]

           Federal conformity relating to commercial vehicles (Section  
            16).  Section 34500 of the Vehicle Code establishes safety  
            regulations for trucks and other commercial vehicles.  In  
            order to be eligible for federal Motor Carrier Safety  
            Assistance Program grant funds, the state must enforce  
            statutes and regulations that are consistent with Title 49 of  
            the Code of Federal Regulations relating to commercial vehicle  
            enforcement.  This bill amends Section 34500 of the Vehicle  
            Code to bring it into compliance with federal regulations,  
            pursuant to findings in an audit by the Federal Motor Carrier  
            Safety Administration.  [Submitted by the California Highway  
            Patrol]
               
           Utility service vehicles (Section 17).  Title 49 of the Code  
            of Federal Regulations exempts utility service vehicles from  
            federal hours-of-service rules and defines a utility service  
            vehicle as any commercial vehicle used to repair, maintain, or  
            operate any structures or any other facilities necessary for  
            the delivery of public utility services, while engaging in any  
            activity necessarily related to the delivery of utility  
            services to customers.  This definition includes any service  
            vehicles used for delivery of utility service, whether driven  
            by a utility employee or a contractor.  Section 34501.2 of the  
            Vehicle Code exempts a driver employed by various public  
            utilities from hours-of-service rules, but does not clearly  
            exempt a licensed contractor working on behalf of the utility.  
             Utilities rely heavily on contractors to restore service  
            during an emergency.  This bill exempts drivers employed by a  
            public utility, as well as contractors working on behalf of a  
            utility to restore service during an emergency, from state  
            hours-of-service rules.  [Submitted by Western Line  
            Constructors]
          
           Off-highway vehicle (OHV) registration stickers (Section 18).   
            Existing law requires an individual to obtain a green or red  
            registration sticker from DMV in order to operate an OHV on  
            public land.  An OHV rider does not need a registration  
            sticker to operate on private property, but does need a  
            sticker in order to transport an OHV that is not in operation  
            (e.g., in a truck) over public roads.  Thus, an individual  
            must obtain a registration sticker even to simply transport an  




          AB 2752 (ASM TRANS)                                    Page 5

                                                                       


            OHV from one private property to another.  This bill deletes  
            the requirement to register an OHV in order to transport it  
            over public roads.  [Submitted by Senator DeSaulnier]

          COMMENTS:

           1.Purpose  .  The Assembly Transportation Committee is authoring  
            this bill as a means of combining multiple, non-controversial  
            changes to statutes into one bill so that the Legislature can  
            make minor amendments in a cost-effective manner.  There is no  
            known opposition to any item in this bill, and if concerns  
            arise that cannot be resolved, the committee will delete the  
            provision of concern from this bill.

          

          Assembly Votes:

               Floor:    78-0
               Appr: 17-0
               Trans:    15-0

          POSITIONS:  (Communicated to the committee before noon on  
          Monday, 
                       June 23, 2014.)

               SUPPORT:  None received.

               OPPOSED:  None received.