BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 2766
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 6, 2014

                  ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON ELECTIONS AND REDISTRICTING
                                  Paul Fong, Chair
           AB 2766 (Elections & Redistricting Committee) - As Introduced:   
                                    April 2, 2014
           
          SUBJECT  :   Elections: central committees: oaths.

           SUMMARY  :   Repeals provisions of law that require county central  
          committee members of Democratic, Republican, and American  
          Independent parties, whether elected to the committee or  
          appointed to fill a vacancy, before he or she enters upon the  
          duties of his office, to take and subscribe the oath or  
          affirmation to uphold the California and United States  
          Constitutions.  

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Requires public officials to take an oath or affirmation of  
            office to support and defend the California and United States  
            Constitutions.  

          2)Requires and defines a public officer and employee to include  
            "every officer and employee of the State, including the  
            University of California, every county, city, city and county,  
            district, and authority, including any department, division,  
            bureau, board, commission, agency, or instrumentality of any  
            of the foregoing."

          3)Requires county central committee members of the Democratic,  
            Republican, and American Independent Parties, whether elected  
            to the committee or appointed to fill a vacancy, before he or  
            she enters upon the duties of his office, to take and  
            subscribe the oath or affirmation to uphold the California and  
            United States Constitutions.

          4)Provides that it is the right of the people to freely exercise  
            religion, freedom of speech and press, and to peaceably  
            assemble and to petition the government for redress of  
            grievances.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Keyed non-fiscal by the Legislative Counsel.

           COMMENTS  :   








                                                                  AB 2766
                                                                  Page  2


           1)Purpose of the Bill  : This is one of the Assembly Elections &  
            Redistricting Committee's bills, containing changes to  
            provisions of the Elections Code to conform state law to a  
            recent Superior Court ruling in  Barta v. Bowen  , in which the  
            court found that the Elections Code requirement for central  
            committee members to take the oath of office was  
            unconstitutional.  The provisions of this bill are changes  
            requested by the Secretary of State (SOS). 

           2)Loyalty Oaths  :  Article XX, Section 3 of the California  
            Constitution requires public officials to take an oath or  
            affirmation of office to support and defend the California and  
            United States Constitutions.   Additionally, existing state  
            statute requires each county central committee member of the  
            Democratic, Republican, and American Independent Party,  
            whether elected to the committee or appointed to fill a  
            vacancy, to take and subscribe to the oath or affirmation set  
            forth in Article XX, Section 3 of the California Constitution,  
            before he or she enters upon the duties of his or her office.   
            Current law does not include a similar loyalty oath  
            requirement for members of the central committee of the Peace  
            and Freedom Party. 

            Last year, a lawsuit was filed against the SOS challenging the  
            loyalty oath requirement for political party central committee  
            members.  In the lawsuit, the petitioner alleged that  
            requiring central committee members to take the oath of office  
            found in the Article XX, Section 3 of the California  
            Constitution is a violation of the United States and  
            California Constitutions. The petitioner requested the court  
            to declare Elections Code Sections 7210, 7408, and 7655  
            invalid because county central committee members are not  
            public officeholders or employees and consequently, they  
            should not be required to take the oath.  Additionally, the  
            petitioner alleged that the oath requirement violates the  
            associational rights of the political parties by regulating  
            the internal affairs of these political parties without a  
            compelling state interest.

            The Superior Court ruled in favor of the petitioner's request  
            for a declaratory judgment that Elections Code Sections 7210,  
            7408, and 7655 are unconstitutional.  

            In light of the Superior Court's decision and because the SOS  








                                                                  AB 2766
                                                                  Page  3

            concedes that Elections Code Sections 7210, 7408, and 7655  
            could be considered unconstitutional, this bill repeals the  
            loyalty oath requirements in the Elections Code for the county  
            central committee members of the Democratic, Republican, and  
            American Independent Parties.  Political parties would be free  
            to impose their own requirements for members of their central  
            committees, but the state would no longer require central  
            committee members to take the oath contained in Article XX,  
            Section 3 of the California Constitution before taking office.  
             

           3)Arguments in Support  :  Secretary of State Debra Bowen writes  
            in support:

               A Superior Court decision in Barta v. Bowen (2013) ruled  
               the loyalty oath required of the county central committee  
               members is unconstitutional based on the U.S. Constitution  
               First Amendment right to association.  The Court has said  
               party offices are not public offices and the state can only  
               require an oath for people serving public offices. 

               The freedom to association is an essential cornerstone of a  
               democracy.  It is not in the interest of California to  
               legislate the inner workings of political parties, and AB  
               2766 allows the decision of whether to require an oath from  
               county central committee members to be made by the  
               political party itself.  Parties that wish to require  
               loyalty oaths of their central committee members may do so  
               under their own party rules.  AB 2766 will avoid  
               unnecessary state costs that would be incurred defending an  
               unconstitutional requirement currently placed upon  
               political parties. 

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          Secretary of State Debra Bowen

          Opposition 
           
          None on file.
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Nichole Becker / E. & R. / (916)  
          319-2094 








                                                                  AB 2766
                                                                  Page  4