BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  SB 29
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 29 (Correa)
          As Amended  August 11, 2014
          Majority vote 

           SENATE VOTE  :27-10  
           
           ELECTIONS           5-2         APPROPRIATIONS      12-5        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Fong, Bocanegra, Bonta,   |Ayes:|Gatto, Bocanegra,         |
          |     |Hall, Perea               |     |Bradford,                 |
          |     |                          |     |Ian Calderon, Campos,     |
          |     |                          |     |Eggman, Gomez, Holden,    |
          |     |                          |     |Pan, Quirk,               |
          |     |                          |     |Ridley-Thomas, Weber      |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Donnelly, Logue           |Nays:|Bigelow, Donnelly, Jones, |
          |     |                          |     |Linder, Wagner            |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY :  Allows vote by mail (VBM) ballots to be counted if  
          they are cast by election day and received by the elections  
          official by mail no later than three days after the election.   
          Specifically,  this bill  :   

          1)Provides that a VBM ballot is timely cast if it is received by  
            the voter's elections official via the United States Postal  
            Service (USPS) or a bona fide private mail delivery company no  
            later than three days after election day and either of the  
            following is satisfied:

             a)   The ballot is postmarked or is time stamped or date  
               stamped by a bona fide private mail delivery company on or  
               before election day; or,

             b)   If the ballot has no postmark, a postmark with no date,  
               or an illegible postmark, the VBM ballot identification  
               envelope is date stamped by the elections official upon  
               receipt of the VBM ballot from the USPS or a bona fide  
               private mail delivery company, and is signed and dated by  
               the voter on or before election day.

          2)Allows jurisdictions that have the necessary computer  








                                                                  SB 29
                                                                  Page  2


            capability to begin processing VBM ballots on the 10th  
            business day prior to the election, instead of the seventh  
            business day prior to the election.

          3)Extends the deadline for elections officials to prepare a  
            certified statement of the results of an election from 28 days  
            after the election to 30 days after the election.

          4)Allows counties to continue to use envelopes and other  
            official election materials that do not take into account the  
            provisions of this bill until the supply of those materials is  
            exhausted.
           
          FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, minor net reimbursable costs or minor net savings. 

          County elections officials will incur additional costs to  
          manually check for a postmark on all ballots arriving up to  
          three days following election day and to date-stamp ballots  
          received within this timeframe that do not have a postmark.  An  
          unofficial count indicates that more than 20,000 ballots arrived  
          too late to be counted at the last statewide general election.   
          At this level, the additional costs to counties statewide would  
          likely be very minor.  As more voters become aware that they may  
          mail their VBM ballot as late as election day, many more ballots  
          are likely to arrive after election day, and the additional  
          costs to counties will increase commensurately. Offsetting these  
          additional costs, however, are provisions in the bill allowing  
          counties to begin processing VBM ballots three days earlier and  
          providing two additional days to certify election results.   
          These provisions will reduce counties' personnel costs to  
          conduct every election.  The likely net result of this bill is  
          thus insignificant net costs or savings.

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author, "SB 29 provides that any  
          valid vote-by-mail ballot will be accepted if it is postmarked  
          on or before Election Day and received by the elections official  
          no later than three days after Election Day.  A date stamp from  
          a bona fide mail delivery service, such as FedEx will also be  
          accepted.

          "Late delivery of otherwise valid ballots has long been a  
          problem but will grow worse given the U.S. Postal Service's  
          [USPS] plans to continue closing mail processing centers.








                                                                  SB 29
                                                                  Page  3



          "According to estimates, as many as 26,000 mail ballots arrived  
          too late to be counted in California's November 2010 election -  
          and this was prior to the USPS cutbacks."

          In 2012, the Assembly Elections and Redistricting Committee and  
          the Senate Elections and Constitutional Amendments Committee  
          held a joint oversight hearing to discuss USPS facility closures  
          and the impact on voters and upcoming elections.  During the  
          hearing, state and county elections officials testified about  
          the impact that recent post office and processing facility  
          closures had on their jurisdictions and on local elections, as  
          well as the anticipated challenges with more closures expected.

          According to testimony from elections officials, one of the most  
          significant impacts those closures had on the election process  
          is that there had been significant delays in mail delivery in  
          some circumstances.  Elections officials from counties that were  
          previously served by closed facilities have indicated that some  
          first class mail took five to seven days to arrive after  
          closures of USPS facilities, compared to the usual delivery time  
          of one to three days.

          To the extent that these closures and additional future closures  
          planned by the USPS result in mail delivery delays, voters who  
          mail their ballots within a reasonable timeframe could, through  
          no fault of their own, find themselves disenfranchised.  
           
          According to information from the National Association of  
          Secretaries of State, three states require mail ballots from  
          civilians living in the United States to be returned prior to  
          election day in order to be counted, while 36 states (including  
          California) require such ballots to be received by election day.  
           Eleven states and the District of Columbia allow mail ballots  
          from civilians living in the Unites States to arrive after  
          election day and still be counted as long as the ballot is  
          postmarked (or in some cases, signed and dated) by election day.

          Please see the policy committee analysis for a full discussion  
          of this bill.

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Ethan Jones / E. & R. / (916) 319-2094 









                                                                  SB 29
                                                                  Page  4


                                                                FN: 0004610