BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                            Senator Kevin de Le�n, Chair


          SB 30 (Calderon) - Cancellation of Indebtedness: Mortgage Debt  
          Forgiveness
          
          Amended: March 6, 2013          Policy Vote: G&F 6-0
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: No
          Hearing Date: May 23, 2013      Consultant: Ingenito, Robert 
          
          SUSPENSE FILE. AS PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED.


          Bill Summary: SB 30 would exclude qualified mortgage debt that  
          is forgiven by a lender during the 2013 taxable year from  
          California taxable income, in partial conformity to the federal  
          Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007.

          Fiscal Impact (as approved on May 23, 2013): The Franchise Tax  
          Board (FTB) estimates that SB 30 would result in General Fund  
          revenue losses of $50 million in 2013-14 and $5 million in  
          2014-15.

          Background: Debt that is forgiven or cancelled by a lender is  
          generally treated as income on a tax return, and is thus  
          taxable. Current law generally requires a taxpayer to include a  
          cancellation of debt as taxable income in the year in which the  
          "discharge of indebtedness" occurs, with specified exceptions.   
          Existing federal law, the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act  
          of 2007, initially excluded qualified principal residence  
          indebtedness that is discharged from January 1, 2007 through  
          December 31, 2009 from federal taxable income. The exclusion was  
          subsequently extended through January 1, 2013, and most recently  
          extended a third time (through January 1, 2014). Married  
          taxpayers filing jointly may exclude up to $2 million in  
          qualified principal residence indebtedness that is forgiven by a  
          lender, while married persons filing separate or single  
          taxpayers may exclude up to $1 million. California law provided  
          a partial exclusion until January 1, 2013.

          Proposed Law: SB 30 would conform state tax law to the federal  
          Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007, with the following  
          exceptions:
           Taxpayers may only exclude from their income up to $250,000  
            (single filers)/$500,000 (joint filers) of cancelled debt, and








          SB 30 (Calderon)
          Page 1


           Taxpayers may only exclude indebtedness on loans up to  
            $400,000 (single filers)/$800,000 (joint filers). Taxpayers  
            must first reduce any amount excluded for state tax purposes  
            by any debt forgiven on loan amounts above these thresholds. 


          Related Legislation: As noted above, California partially  
          conformed to federal law initially in 2008 (SB 1055, Machado)  
          and a second time in 2010 (SB 401, Wolk).

          Staff Comments: This bill would provide income tax relief to  
          distressed homeowners by allowing borrowers who have negotiated  
          a cancellation of debt by a lender as a result of restructuring  
          a mortgage loan or a short sale on a principal residence to  
          exclude the amount of forgiven debt from income for state tax  
          purposes.  The exclusion applies to the forgiveness of debt  
          incurred to purchase, construct or improve a principal  
          residence, as defined.

          The FTB's estimate of revenue loss employs a "top-down"  
          methodology that begins with the exclusion's estimated revenue  
          loss nationally (prepared by the Joint Committee on Taxation)  
          and then applies "California factors" to determine the amount of  
          the estimated loss that would occur in California.

          The committee amendments would add an urgency clause and make  
          enactment contingent upon enactment of SB 391.