SJR 11, as introduced, DeSaulnier. Housing with services.
This measure would urge the President and Congress of the United States to support housing with services models to achieve federal goals of using subsidized housing as a platform for service and encourage the President and Congress of the United States to expand Sections 1115 and 1915(c) federal Medicare waivers to test and integrate services into affordable housing settings.
Fiscal committee: no.
P1 1WHEREAS, “Housing with services” is unlicensed, subsidized,
2congregate properties for low-income seniors that provide access
3to a range of health-related and supportive services available to
4residents on a voluntary basis. Services are provided by
5appropriately credentialed providers and can include care
6coordination from an interdisciplinary team, resident service
7coordinators, and health educators, or colocation of health services,
8for example a federally qualified health center or Program of
9All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE), onsite. Housing with
10services can enable residents to age in place, reduce hospital and
11emergency room usage, and postpone the need for costly
12institutional care; and
13WHEREAS, According to the California Department of Aging,
14the population over 60 years of age is expected to grow more than
15twice as fast as the total population. Older adults will have an
P2 1overall increase of 112 percent during the period from 1990 to
22020. California’s oldest old-age group, those over 85 years of
3age, will increase at an even faster rate than older adults, having
4an overall increase of 143 percent during the period from 1990 to
52020. The surge of the 85 years of age and over age group in
6California is expected to emerge most strongly between 2030 and
72040, as the first of the “baby boomers” reach 85 years of age; and
8WHEREAS, Ten percent of Californians over 65 years of age
9live in poverty, and 21 percent live below 150 percent of the
10poverty line, according to the American Community Survey. In
11the United States, the percent of older Americans in poverty
12increases with age, with the oldest of elderly people most likely
13to be poor. Nationwide, 10 percent of persons 75 years of age and
14older were considered poor, compared to 8 percent of persons 65
15to 74 years of age; and
16WHEREAS, Approximately 1.3 million very low income seniors
17are assisted through publicly subsidized housing, very low income
18being defined as less than 50 percent of the area median income.
19The Section 202 Supportive Housing for the Elderly program is
20the only United States Department of Housing and Urban
21Development (HUD) program that currently provides housing
22exclusively for elderly households, with approximately 263,000
23units. In 2006, HUD reported that 38 percent of all Section 202
24properties reported having a service coordinator on staff. Service
25coordinators in HUD developments for elderly persons and persons
26with disabilities work with residents to coordinate a wide range
27of services. These include the arrangement of transportation, meal
28services, housekeeping, medication management, visits from
29nurses, dentists, and massage therapists, haircuts, and social
30activities; and
31WHEREAS, The nexus between affordable senior housing and
32long-term services and supports is natural. According to HUD’s
33fiscal year 2013 proposed budget, 38 percent of seniors in Section
34202 properties are frail or near frail, requiring assistance with at
35least three basic actives of living, such as eating, bathing,
36grooming, dressing, or home management activities, and thus can
37be considered at risk for premature institutionalization; and
38WHEREAS, Research has also found that service-enriched
39housing for the elderly, and the presence of service coordinators
40in particular, enables older residents to remain in their homes
P3 1longer. A satisfaction study found that residents residing in
2properties that offered service coordination had an average length
3of stay that was six months longer than properties that did not offer
4service coordination; and
5WHEREAS, The cost of institutionalization exceeds the cost of
6housing with services models. In 2004, the cost of a stay in a
7nursing home funded by Medi-Cal was approximately $49,000 on
8average, while the cost of Section 202 housing plus the most
9frequently provided services, such as food, transportation, and
10housekeeping, is estimated to cost only $13,000. If a fuller set of
11personal services is provided for very frail elders, the cost of
12housing plus services is estimated at approximately $25,000, about
13one-half of the cost of skilled nursing care; and
14WHEREAS, As stated in HUD’s fiscal year 2013 proposed
15budget, it is the department’s goal to use its housing as a platform
16to deliver a wide variety of services to improve the quality of life
17of its residents. HUD seeks to build formal and informal
18relationships with public and private healthcare providers, and
19with health education organizations, to provide access to healthcare
20information and services for recipients of HUD assistance. HUD’s
21fiscal year 2013 proposed budget provides a total of $625 million
22for the Supportive Housing for the Elderly and the Supportive
23Housing for Persons with Disabilities programs, which include
24$154 million to support 5,300 additional supportive housing units
25to better connect residents with the supportive services they need
26to age in place and live independently; and
27WHEREAS, The state is directed under the Olmstead Plan to
28improve its long-term care system so that its residents have
29available an array of community care options that allow them to
30avoid unnecessary institutionalization. The Olmstead Plan includes
31goals to include services that transition individuals from
32institutional settings to the most integrated settings appropriate for
33their needs, including the California Community Transitions
34(CCT). CCT is California’s Money Follows the Person Program.
35Numerous research studies cite access to affordable housing as a
36barrier to transitioning a greater number of individuals out of
37nursing homes; and
38WHEREAS, Many state programs have sought to rebalance
39spending of health care dollars toward home and community-based
40services and away from institutional settings, such as nursing
P4 1homes. California is one of seven states that invested more
2Medicaid long-term care funding for Home and Community-Based
3Services than for long-term institutional care based on data from
4the 2008 and 2009. Subsidized housing communities can support
5additional rebalancing efforts by offering economies of scale that
6can increase service delivery efficiencies. These efficiencies can
7result in a more regular support presence and more affordable care;
8now, therefore, be it
9Resolved by the Senate and the Assembly of the State of
10California, jointly, That the Legislature applauds methods that
11promote greater collaboration between affordable housing providers
12and HCBS that divert seniors from institutionalization and
13encourage aging in place; and be it further
14Resolved, That the Legislature urges the President and Congress
15of the United States to support housing with services models to
16achieve federal goals of using subsidized housing as a platform
17for service delivery; and be it further
18Resolved, That the Legislature encourages the President and
19Congress of the United States to expand Sections 1115 and 1915(c)
20federal Medicare waivers to test and integrate services into
21affordable housing settings; and be it further
22Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate transmit copies of
23this resolution to the President and the Vice President of the United
24States, to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, to the
25Majority Leader of the Senate, and to each Senator and
26Representative from California in the Congress of the United
27States.
O
99