SJR 19, as introduced, Correa. High-cost loan limits.
This measure would express the Legislature’s opposition to reduction of the current national and high-cost conforming loan limits for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) and would urge the FHFA not to implement any reductions. This measure also would urge the President and Congress of the United States to join California in opposing any reduction of the national and high-cost conforming loan limits.
Fiscal committee: no.
P1 1WHEREAS, Since 1980, Congress has provided in statute for
2“high-cost” conforming loan limits so residents in states where
3the cost of housing is higher than the national average may still
4gain access to safe and affordable mortgages; and
5WHEREAS, In 2006, the California Legislature passed a joint
6resolution that memorializes the President and Congress of the
7United States to recognize California is a high-cost area for
8purposes of purchasing a home and should be considered the same
9status as other high-cost areas; and
10WHEREAS, In 2008, the California Legislature passed a joint
11resolution to memorialize its opposition to any reduction in
12high-cost loan limits in California; and
P2 1WHEREAS, In 2008, the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008
2created a temporary increase in mortgage loan limits and allowed
3for areas in California to be recognized as high cost, and
4WHEREAS, In July 2008, Congress passed The Housing and
5Economic Recovery Act of 2008, which established the current
6law and formula for determining loan limits, set the high-cost loan
7limit formula, made permanent in statute language that allows for
8areas in California to be recognized as high cost, and contained
9language prohibiting the reduction of conforming loan limits; and
10WHEREAS, In September 2008, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
11were placed under conservatorship of the Federal Housing Finance
12Agency (FHFA); and
13WHEREAS, In January 2012, following the expiration of the
14Economic Stimulus Act of 2008, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
15high-cost loan limits were reduced from $729,750 back to the 2006
16value of $625,500; and
17WHEREAS, In December 2013, the FHFA issued a request for
18comments on a proposal to lower the conforming loan limits for
19Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by an additional $25,000 in select
20high-cost areas including California; and
21WHEREAS, California has over 25 million residents that will
22be adversely affected by the proposed regular and high-cost loan
23limit reductions; and
24WHEREAS, Nine counties in California have a median home
25price above the proposed reduced cap on high-cost loan limits;
26and
27WHEREAS, FHFA data indicates that over 36,000 loans
28originated in California could be adversely affected by the proposed
29loan limit reduction; and
30WHEREAS, California housing markets are only beginning to
31recover from a sustained negative market, and continue to lag
32behind the pace of recovery being experienced by the rest of the
33nation; and
34WHEREAS, Current high-cost loan limits allow California
35homebuyers the same access to safe and affordable mortgage
36capital as homebuyers in states with lower home prices; and
37WHEREAS, The adverse effect of lowering the loan limits will
38have a negative impact on California homebuyers that will ripple
39through the housing market and the larger economy; now,
40therefore, be it
P3 1Resolved by the Senate and the Assembly of the State of
2California, jointly, That the Legislature opposes any reduction of
3the current national and high-cost conforming loan limits for Fannie
4Mae and Freddie Mac by the FHFA, and urges the FHFA not to
5implement any reductions; and be it further
6Resolved, That the Legislature urges the President and Congress
7of the United States to join California in opposing any reduction
8of the national and high-cost conforming loan limits; and be it
9further
10Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate transmit copies of
11this resolution to the President and Vice President of the United
12States, to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, to the
13Majority Leader of the Senate, to each Senator and Representative
14from California in the Congress of the United States, to the
15Secretary of the Treasury, and to the Director of the Federal
16Housing Finance Agency.
O
99