Amended in Assembly June 25, 2014

Amended in Assembly June 12, 2014

Senate Joint ResolutionNo. 19


Introduced by Senator Correa

(Coauthor: Assembly Member Dababneh)

March 10, 2014


Senate Joint Resolution No. 19—Relative to high-cost loan limits.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SJR 19, as amended, Correa. High-cost loan limits.

This measure would express the Legislature’s opposition to reduction of the current national and high-cost conforming loan limits for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) and would urge the FHFA to continue to resist implementation of any such reductions. This measure also would urge the President and Congress of the United States to join California in opposing any reduction of the national and high-cost conforming loan limits.

Fiscal committee: no.

P1    1WHEREAS, Since 1980, Congress has provided in statute for
2“high-cost” conforming loan limits so residents in states where
3the cost of housing is higher than the national average may still
4gain access to safe and affordable mortgages; and

5WHEREAS, In 2006, the California Legislature passed a joint
6resolution that memorialized the President and Congress of the
7United States to recognize California as a high-cost area for
8purposes of purchasing a home and to be considered the same
9status as other high-cost areas; and

P2    1WHEREAS, In 2008, the California Legislature passed a joint
2resolution that memorialized its opposition to any reduction in
3high-cost loan limits in California; and

4WHEREAS, In 2008, the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008
5created a temporary increase in mortgage loan limits and allowed
6for areas in California to be recognized as high cost; and

7WHEREAS, In July 2008, Congress passed the Housing and
8Economic Recovery Act of 2008, which established the current
9law and formula for determining loan limits, set the high-cost loan
10limit formula, made permanent in statute language that allows for
11areas in California to be recognized as high cost, and contained
12language prohibiting the reduction of conforming loan limits; and

13WHEREAS, In September 2008, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
14were placed under conservatorship of the Federal Housing Finance
15Agency (FHFA); and

16WHEREAS, In January 2012, following the expiration of the
17begin insert temporary high-cost loan limit increase provided in theend insert Economic
18Stimulus Act of 2008, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac high-cost loan
19limits were reduced from $729,750 back to the 2006 value of
20$625,500; and

21WHEREAS, In December 2013, the FHFA issued a request for
22comments on a proposal to lower the conforming loan limits for
23Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by an additional $25,000 in select
24high-cost areas including California; and

25WHEREAS, In May 2014, the Director of the FHFA announced
26that the FHFA “will not use its authority as conservator to reduce
27the loan limits”; and

begin delete

28WHEREAS, The FHFA is not bound to follow a policy on loan
29limits that protects California homebuyers in the future; and

end delete

30WHEREAS, California has over 25 million residents that would
31be adversely affected by the proposed regular and high-cost loan
32limit reductions; and

33WHEREAS, Eleven counties in California have a median home
34price above the proposed reduced cap on high-cost loan limits;
35and

36WHEREAS, FHFA data indicates that over 36,000 loans
37originated in California could be adversely affected by the proposed
38loan limit reduction; and

39WHEREAS, California housing markets are only beginning to
40recover from a sustained negative market, and continue to lag
P3    1behind the pace of recovery being experienced by the rest of the
2nation; and

3WHEREAS, Current high-cost loan limits allow California home
4buyers the same access to safe and affordable mortgage capital as
5home buyers in states with lower home prices; and

6WHEREAS, The adverse effect of lowering the loan limits
7would have a negative impact on California home buyers that
8would ripple through the housing market and the larger economy;
9now, therefore, be it

10Resolved by the Senate and the Assembly of the State of
11California, jointly,
That the Legislature opposes any reduction of
12the current national and high-cost conforming loan limits for Fannie
13Mae and Freddie Mac by the FHFA, and urges the FHFA to
14continue to resist implementation of any such reductions; and be
15it further

16Resolved, That the Legislature urges the President and Congress
17of the United States to join California in opposing any reduction
18of the national and high-cost conforming loan limits; and be it
19further

20Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate transmit copies of
21this resolution to the President and Vice President of the United
22States, to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, to the
23Majority Leader of the Senate, to each Senator and Representative
24from California in the Congress of the United States, to the
25Secretary of the Treasury, and to the Director of the Federal
26Housing Finance Agency.



O

    97