BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SJR 6
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   August 13, 2013

                  ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON ELECTIONS AND REDISTRICTING
                                  Paul Fong, Chair
                   SJR 6 (Yee) - As Introduced:  February 25, 2013

           SENATE VOTE  :   24-11
           
          SUBJECT  :   The Lines Interfere with National Elections Act of  
          2013.

           SUMMARY  :   Proclaims the Legislature's support for federal  
          legislation that is intended to ensure that voters in elections  
          for federal office do not wait in long lines in order to vote.   
          Specifically,  this resolution  :   

          1)Makes the following findings and declarations:

             a)   The right to vote is a fundamental right of citizens of  
               the United States;

             b)   It is a fundamental principle of our representative  
               democracy that citizens shall not be required to overcome  
               unreasonable obstacles in order to exercise their right to  
               vote;

             c)   At the presidential election on November 6, 2012, voters  
               in Florida, Virginia, Ohio, and other states waited in line  
               for up to seven hours to cast ballots, and some voters were  
               required to wait in line well after the polls were closed;

             d)   More than 200,000 voters in Florida likely decided not  
               to vote in the election held on November 6, 2012, because  
               of their frustration with long lines;

             e)   United States Senator Barbara Boxer has introduced in  
               Congress the Lines Interfere with National Elections Act of  
               2013 (LINE Act), which would amend the Help America Vote  
               Act of 2002 (HAVA), to ensure that voters in elections for  
               federal office do not wait in long lines in order to vote;

             f)   The LINE Act would require the United States Attorney  
               General, in consultation with the Election Assistance  
               Commission (EAC), to issue standards by January 1, 2014,  
               regarding the minimum number of voting systems, poll  








                                                                  SJR 6
                                                                  Page  2

               workers, and other election resources needed on election  
               day and during early voting periods to prevent a waiting  
               time of more than one hour at any polling place;

             g)   The LINE Act would require states where a substantial  
               number of voters waited longer than 90 minutes to cast a  
               vote in the presidential election held on November 6, 2012,  
               or any election for federal office held after that date, to  
               comply with a remedial plan to minimize the waiting times  
               of voters and to ensure voters do not face similar delays  
               in the future; and,

             h)   An election system with fair access provides the  
               greatest guard to our rights and liberties.

          2)Declares that the Legislature of the State of California  
            supports the LINE Act and memorializes Congress to pass, and  
            President Obama to sign, the LINE Act.

           EXISTING LAW  establishes the EAC, pursuant to HAVA, and provides  
          for it to serve as a national clearinghouse and resource for the  
          compilation of information and review of procedures with respect  
          to the administration of Federal elections.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   This resolution is keyed non-fiscal by the  
          Legislative Counsel.

           COMMENTS  :   

           1)Purpose of the Resolution  :  According to the author:

               On Election Day, voters across our state and nation  
               make their voices heard by electing representatives to  
               best represent their district and its issues. While  
               millions of voters easily casted their votes in the  
               recent presidential election last November, voters in  
               states like Florida, Ohio and Virginia were faced with  
               long lines at polling places. So long, in fact, that  
               in one polling place in Miami, voters waited up to  
               seven hours before finally having their opportunity to  
               vote. 

               Some states suppress their voters by essentially  
               instituting a "poll tax" on many of their voters, who  
               are often people of color, seniors, and the working  








                                                                  SJR 6
                                                                  Page  3

               poor. For a hotel worker in Florida - who earns $10  
               per hour - he or she essentially spent $50 to $60 just  
               to vote. No one should have to take off seven hours of  
               work just to participate in our democracy.

               This bill urges the United States Congress and the  
               President of the United States to pass Senate Bill 58  
               - LINE Act of 2013 to ensure that voters have fair  
               access to the election system and our democracy.

           2)LINE Act of 2013  :  On January 22, 2013, Senator Barbara Boxer  
            introduced S. 58, the LINE Act of 2013.  Under the provisions  
            of the LINE Act, as introduced, the United States Attorney  
            General, in coordination with the EAC to the extent  
            practicable, would be required to issue standards regarding  
            the minimum number of voting systems, poll workers, and other  
            election resources for each voting site on the day of federal  
            elections and during any period of early voting for federal  
            elections with the goal of ensuring an equal waiting time for  
            all voters in each state and to prevent a waiting time of over  
            one hour at any polling place.  States would be required to  
            comply with these standards beginning September 15, 2014.  The  
            LINE Act provides that the standards developed by the Attorney  
            General shall take into account factors such as the voting age  
            population in a jurisdiction, voter turnout in past elections,  
            the number of registered voters, the number of voters who  
            registered since the most recent election, census data for the  
            population served by each voting site, the educational levels  
            and socio-economic factors of the population served by each  
            voting site, the needs and numbers of disabled voters and  
            voters with limited English proficiency, and the type of  
            voting systems used.

          In addition, the LINE Act requires the United States Attorney  
            General, in coordination with the EAC to the extent  
            practicable, to identify jurisdictions in which a substantial  
            number of voters waited more than 90 minutes to cast a vote in  
            the November 6, 2012 general election, or any election for  
            federal office held on or after that date.  Jurisdictions so  
            identified by the Attorney General would be required to comply  
            with a remedial plan, developed by the Attorney General,  
            designed to minimize the waiting times of voters in the  
            jurisdiction.  

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :








                                                                  SJR 6
                                                                  Page  4


           Support 
           
          None on file.
           
            Opposition 
           
          None on file.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Ethan Jones / E. & R. / (916) 319-2094