P1 1WHEREAS, Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act (50 U.S.C.
2Sec. 1861) authorizes the government to collect “tangible things”
3that are “relevant” to an authorized national security investigation;
4and
5WHEREAS, The National Security Agency (NSA) has
6reportedly used Section 215 to collect metadata on every telephone
7call made or received by every American over the last seven years;
8and
9WHEREAS, This metadata collected by the NSA was not limited
10to dialed numbers, but also included the telephone numbers of
11incoming calls, the times of calls, and call routing information;
12and
13WHEREAS, The federal Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
14(FISA) Court found in 2011 that the NSA illegally collects tens of
15thousands of Internet transactions between Americans within the
16United States in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United
17States Constitution; and
18WHEREAS, Until 2011, the FISA Court, charged with the
19judicial oversight of the NSA to ensure no laws are broken, was
20unaware of the acquisition of tens of thousands of Internet
21transactions involving Americans within the United States who
22were not connected to any legitimate investigation; and
P2 1WHEREAS, Many legislators who voted for the USA PATRIOT
2Act, including the past chairman of the authorizing committee of
3that law, have stated that the NSA’s blanket surveillance program
4goes far beyond what the USA PATRIOT Act was intended to do;
5and
6WHEREAS, The government revelation in 2011 regarding the
7NSA’s acquisition of Internet transactions marked the third
8instance in less than three years in which the government had
9disclosed a substantial misrepresentation regarding the scope of
10a major collection program; and
11WHEREAS, The Director of National Intelligence, James
12Clapper, Jr., has admitted to misleading Congress about the actual
13scope of the call record surveillance program; and
14WHEREAS, Section 215 is silent as to how the government
15may use these records once it has obtained them; and
16WHEREAS, The Fourth Amendment to the United States
17Constitution states: “The right of the people to be secure in their
18persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches
19and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but
20upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and
21particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons
22or things to be seized”; and
23WHEREAS, The United States Constitution, including the
24Fourth Amendment, applies at all times to all government agencies
25and all government employees; and
26WHEREAS, All Americans cannot reasonably be considered
27to be suspicious simply for making or receiving telephone calls;
28and
29WHEREAS, The NSA’s seizure of the telephone records of all
30Americans is therefore an “unreasonable seizure” by any definition
31of the term; and
32WHEREAS, An NSA audit, dated May 2012, counted 2,776
33incidents in the preceding 12 months alone of unauthorized
34collection, storage, access to, or distribution of legally protected
35communications; and
36WHEREAS, On June 7, 2013, United States Senator Rand Paul
37introduced legislation, the Fourth Amendment Restoration Act of
382013 (S. 1121), that would explicitly state that the Fourth
39Amendment to the Constitution shall not be construed to allow
40any agency of the United States Government to search the
P3 1telephone records of Americans without a warrant based on
2probable cause; and
3WHEREAS, The bipartisan Amash-Conyers amendment to the
4Department of Defense Appropriations Act (H.R. 2397) would
5have ended the NSA’s blanket seizure of the telephone records of
6Americans, but was narrowly defeated on July 24, 2013; and
7WHEREAS, On August 1, 2013, United States Senator Al
8Franken introduced legislation, the Surveillance Transparency Act
9of 2013 (S. 1452), that would expand and improve ongoing
10government reporting about programs under the USA PATRIOT
11Act and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and make it
12easier for companies to voluntarily disclose information about the
13data the government requires them to collect; now, therefore, be
14it
15Resolved by the Senate of the State of California,That the Senate
16urges the President and the Congress of the United States to pass
17legislation to end the NSA’s blanket, unreasonable, and
18unconstitutional collection of Americans’ telephone recordsbegin insert and
19Internet transactionsend insert and specifically to bar the NSA and other
20agencies from using Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act to
21collect records, including telephonebegin delete records,end deletebegin insert records and Internet
22transactions,end insert pertaining to persons not subject to an investigation
23under the USA
PATRIOT Act; and be it further
24Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate transmit copies of
25this resolution to the President and Vice President of the United
26States, to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, to the
27Majority Leader of the Senate, and to each Senator and
28Representative from California in the Congress of the United
29States, and to the author for appropriate distribution.
O
98