P1 1WHEREAS,begin delete Theend delete City College of San Francisco, founded in
21935, is a long-running and established entity in the San Francisco
3Bay area; and
4WHEREAS,begin delete Theend delete City College of San Francisco is the largest
5community college district with a student enrollment of
6approximately 80,000 students in 2012; and
7WHEREAS,begin delete Theend delete City College of San Francisco gives individuals
8who lack English language skills the ability to learn English to
9gain employment and participate and contribute to the economy;
10and
11WHEREAS,begin delete Theend delete City College of San Francisco is the first stop
12for many recent immigrants to take naturalization courses to
13integrate into the broader society; and
14WHEREAS,begin delete Theend delete City College of San Francisco provides a
15pathway to career and participation in the California dream for
16thousands of people each year; and
17WHEREAS,begin delete Theend delete City College of San Francisco is a valuable
18tool in maintaining the middle class in the City and County of San
19Francisco by being one of the few resources low-income students
20can utilize to climb the economic ladder; and
21WHEREAS,begin delete Theend delete City College of San Francisco is an important
22resource that provides opportunities for low-income students to
P2 1gain job skills and adults to obtain their graduate equivalency
2diplomas; and
3WHEREAS,begin delete Theend delete City College of San Francisco offers over 50
4educational programs and more than 100 work training courses
5and specializes in training the future workforce of the City and
6County of San Francisco in the hospitality, culinary, automotive,
7and construction industries; and
8WHEREAS, California’s Student Success Score Card, a
9performance measurement system created by the Board of
10Governors of the California Community Colleges to track student
11success at all community colleges in California, shows thatbegin delete theend delete
12 City College of San Francisco has a higher percentage of students
13who transfer to a four-year university or earn a vocational
14certificate than the statewide average; and
15WHEREAS,begin delete Theend delete City College of San Francisco is a major job
16creator in the City and County of San Francisco, employing about
171,500 faculty members; and
18WHEREAS, The San Francisco Budget and Legislative Analyst
19has found thatbegin delete theend delete City College of San Francisco generates well
20over $300 million in economic activity every year; and
21WHEREAS, In July, 2012, the Accrediting Commission for
22Community and Junior Colleges sanctionedbegin delete theend delete City College of
23San Francisco with a ‘show cause’ order, which required the
24college to remedy issues identified by the commission; and
25WHEREAS,begin delete On July 31, 2014, the Accrediting Commission begin insert end insertbegin insertIn July
26for Community and Junior Colleges will determine the
27accreditation status of the City College of San Francisco;end delete
282013, the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior
29Colleges voted to terminate City College of San Francisco’s
30accreditation effective July 31, 2014, subject to review and appeal;end insert
31 and
32WHEREAS, Since the ‘show cause’ order issue in 2012,begin delete theend delete
33 City College of San Francisco has made substantial progress in
34remedying the issues identified by the commission; and
35WHEREAS,begin delete Theend delete City College of San Francisco has hired a
36permanent chancellor, chief financial officer, chief counsel, and
37chief instructional officer, and filled other leadership positions;
38and
39WHEREAS,begin delete Theend delete City College of San Francisco has met nearly
40begin delete85end deletebegin insert 95 end insert percent of the 350 objectivesbegin delete laid outend deletebegin insert identified end insert by the
P3 1Accrediting Commission for Community and Juniorbegin delete Colleges to begin insert Colleges
and the Fiscal Crisis and
2maintain its accreditationend delete
3Management Assistance Team, and in the college’s Roadmap to
4Success, and is now in substantial compliance with the
5accreditation standards,end insert butbegin delete is not likely to meet them all byend deletebegin insert there
6are still changes the college must complete that will not be finalized
7byend insert July 31, 2014,begin delete when the fate of its accreditation will be begin insert the date upon which the Accrediting Commission for
8determined;end delete
9Community and Junior Colleges revocation decision is scheduled
10to become final; end insert and
11WHEREAS,begin delete Theend delete City College of San Francisco has asked for
12an extension of time to allow them to fully address the issues
13identified by the Accrediting Commission for Community and
14Junior Colleges but the commissioners have declined the request
15stating that federal law prevented them from granting an extension;
16and
17WHEREAS, The California Community College Board of
18Governors has requested the Accrediting Commission for
19Community and Junior Colleges to rescind its termination of City
20College of San Francisco’s accreditation and send a visiting team
21to the college to document the progress that has been made; and
22WHEREAS, The United States Department of Education
23recently stated that the Accrediting Commission for Community
24and Junior Colleges has the flexibility to givebegin delete theend delete City College of
25San Francisco additional time to remedy all outstanding issues
26without jeopardizing the commission’s standing with the
27department; now, therefore, be it
28Resolved by the Senate of the State of California, That the Senate
29urges the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior
30Colleges to consider the progressbegin delete theend delete City College of San Francisco
31has made and, as necessary, provide the college with additional
32time to continue solving problems and keep its accreditation intact;
33and be it further
34Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate transmit copies of
35this resolution to the author for appropriate distribution.
O
98