BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 54 SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Senator Jerry Hill, Chair 2013-2014 Regular Session BILL NO: SB 54 AUTHOR: Hancock AMENDED: September 3, 2013 FISCAL: Yes HEARING DATE: September 10, 2013 URGENCY: No CONSULTANT: Laura Feinstein SUBJECT : HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT: STATIONARY SOURCES: SKILLED AND TRAINED WORKFORCE SUMMARY : Existing federal law : 1)Defines a stationary source as unmoving structures or activities that are capable of releasing a regulated substance or other extremely hazardous substance into the ambient air, and requires specified entities to prepare a risk management plan (RMP) (Code of Federal Regulations Title 40 §68.3). Existing state law : 1)Establishes an accidental release prevention program implemented by the Office of Emergency Services and the appropriate administering agency, as defined, in each city or county (Health and Safety Code §25531 et seq.). 2)Requires stationary sources subject to the accidental release prevention program to prepare an RMP when required under federal regulations, or if the administering agency determines there is a significant likelihood that the use of regulated substances by a stationary source may pose a regulated substances accident risk (HSC §25531 et seq.). This bill enacts provisions related to contract work performed SB 54 Page 2 at specified stationary sources required to submit an RMP. Specifically, this bill: 1)Requires an owner or operator of a petroleum refinery or a petrochemical manufacturing plant to use contractors and subcontractors that employ a "skilled and trained workforce" to perform work in an apprenticeable occupation in the building and construction trades. 2)Defines a "skilled and trained workforce" as including a minimum percentage of registered apprentices or skilled journeypersons, as defined. 3)Requires the Chief of the Division of Apprenticeship Standards of the Department of Industrial Relations to approve a curriculum of in-person classroom and laboratory instruction for approved advanced safety training for workers at high hazard facilities by January 1, 2016. 4)Defines a "skilled journeyperson" as specified. 5)Adds various other provisions concerning employment practices and apprenticeships. 6)Makes various findings and declarations about the importance of employing skilled workers at facilities that submit RMPs and the utility of apprenticeship training programs. COMMENTS : 1)Referral to the Committee pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10 . SB 54 was originally introduced by Senator Hancock on December 21, 2012, as a measure addressing county employee retirement. On August 5, 2013, Assembly amendments changed the subject of the bill to require a skilled and trained workforce for SB 54 Page 3 hazardous materials management in stationary sources. The measure passed the Assembly Floor on September 9, 2013, by a vote of 51-24. Consistent with Senate Rule 29.10 the Senate Rules Committee has referred the amended bill to the Senate Environmental Quality Committee for a hearing of the Assembly amendments. 2)Purpose of bill . According to the author, SB 54 will reduce unqualified workers performing skilled work inside high-hazard industrial petroleum facilities by requiring that by 2016 60% of each contractor's workforce be graduates of a state-approved apprenticeship program. The author states that the contractors at these facilities should be using the most skilled and qualified workers to reduce public health and safety risks. The author states that refinery safety has been an increasing problem in California and across the United States. Due to recent incidents risking the public's health, including the 2012 Chevron refinery explosion in Richmond, Governor Brown and Members of the Legislature called for changes to improve safety at these facilities. An interagency group was formed to study this issue through various methods including meetings with stakeholders. The author quotes the draft report entitled "Improving Public and Worker Safety at Oil Refineries" issued July 2013 by Governor Brown's Interagency Working Group on Refinery Safety's as follows: "Workers involved in maintenance, represented by building and construction trades unions, reported that training of most maintenance workers (non-refinery employees) is inadequate. They also reported that refineries use mostly contract workers, including out-of-state workers, to conduct maintenance during planned shutdowns of a refinery process (also referred to as turnarounds), and that contract workers have less training and experience and, therefore, are less safe." SB 54 Page 4 3)Arguments in support . Supporters argue that the bill will improve safety at chemical manufacturing facilities, including refineries, by creating a standard on training for the industrial work performed at the facilities. They state that refinery accidents are an increasing problem and that industrial facilities handling toxic substances pose a serious risk to public health and worker safety. Supporters contend that a major factor in refinery accidents is inadequate training for many of the maintenance workers. Specifically, they state that maintenance work at chemical manufacturing facilities is often performed by unskilled, low-wage workers hired off the street or brought in from other states. They feel that requiring contractors to use journeypersons and apprentices who have specified qualifications will prevent accidents at the specified facilities. In addition, they believe that requiring workers to complete in-state training programs will encourage hiring of Californians. 4)Arguments in opposition . The United Steelworkers argue that SB 54 will displace United Steelworkers members because they are not allowed to create their own apprenticeship program, nor participate in the apprenticeship programs mandated under SB 54. Various opponents state that the bill will make oil refineries less safe. They argue that the bill will cause facilities to substitute contract employees for permanent employees who have superior on-site experience and capacity to advocate for safe practices. They contend that problems with facility management and agency oversight, not untrained workers, were the cause of the Chevron refinery disaster. Opponents state the bill is precedent-setting in requiring private industry to pay prevailing wages, raising overhead for California businesses. They further state that construction trades training is not focused on the specialized work that occurs at refineries and chemical plants, and that 20 hours over two years of "approved advanced safety training" will fail to augment public safety, but will delay work at refineries. Additionally, SB 54 Page 5 they feel it is unreasonable that SB 54's hiring mandates take effect before the workers are required to complete the advanced training curriculum. 5)Related legislation . SB 54 is very similar to a bill heard earlier in the 2013 Regular Session by the Senate Environmental Quality Committee, AB 26 (Bonilla). AB 26 requires that oil refineries receiving Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (Fund) moneys employ trained apprentices and journeypersons. Committee members raised concerns that AB 26: a) Could be construed as implying that the Legislature considers petroleum refineries to be a high-priority investment for the Fund. b) Could be construed as implying that oil refineries could receive Fund moneys to pay for work they are already required to do under statutes, regulations or and/or court orders apart from the market-based compliance mechanisms authorized under the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. SB 54 addresses the aforementioned environmental concerns by excluding provisions about the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund. While SB 54 makes changes regarding labor practices at stationary sources of regulated and hazardous substances, it does not change how regulated and hazardous substances are managed under California law. SOURCE : State Building and Construction Trades Council of California, AFL-CIO SUPPORT : California Chapters of National Electrical Contractors Association SB 54 Page 6 California Legislative Conference of the Plumbing, Heating, and Piping Industry California Medical Association California Professional Firefighters California State Association of Electrical Workers California State Council of Laborers California State Pipe Trades Council California Teamsters Public Affairs Council Construction Employers' Association Environmental-Labor Coalition of Contra Costa County International Association of Heat and Frost Insulators, Local 5 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers Western States Council of Sheet Metal Workers Western Steel Council OPPOSITION : Asian Pacific Environmental Network Associated Builders and Contractors of California Association of California Air Conditioning Trade Association California Manufacturers and Technology Association Communities for a Better Environment Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors Association of California United Steelworkers Western Electrical Contractors Association Western States Petroleum Association 34 Individuals