BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                         SB 57|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                 UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 57
          Author:   Lieu (D)
          Amended:  9/3/13
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 4/30/13
          AYES:  Hancock, Anderson, Block, De León, Knight, Liu, Steinberg

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 5/23/13
          AYES:  De León, Walters, Gaines, Hill, Lara, Padilla, Steinberg

           SENATE FLOOR  :  39-0, 5/28/13
          AYES:  Anderson, Beall, Berryhill, Block, Calderon, Cannella,  
            Corbett, Correa, De León, DeSaulnier, Emmerson, Evans, Fuller,  
            Gaines, Galgiani, Hancock, Hernandez, Hill, Hueso, Huff,  
            Jackson, Knight, Lara, Leno, Lieu, Liu, Monning, Nielsen,  
            Padilla, Pavley, Price, Roth, Steinberg, Torres, Walters,  
            Wolk, Wright, Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Vacancy

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  Not available


           SUBJECT  :    Electronic monitoring:  removing or disabling GPS  
          device:  offense

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill prohibits a person who is required to  
          register as a sex offender and who is subject to parole  
          supervision from removing or disabling, as specified, an  
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                      SB 57
                                                                     Page  
          2

          electronic global positioning system (GPS) or other monitoring  
          device affixed as a condition of parole.

           Assembly Amendments  (1) limit the bill to remove the second  
          offense parole violation, (2) remove the third and subsequent  
          felony offense, and (3) remove the language preventing the use  
          of good time credits.

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law:

          1. Requires the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation  
             (CDCR) to monitor sex offenders using a GPS. 

          2. Permits the CDCR to use electronic or GPS monitoring to  
             electronically monitor the whereabouts of individuals on  
             parole. 

          3. Provides that if a parolee who fails to comply with the rules  
             or conditions for the use of electronic monitoring as a  
             supervision tool may be found guilty of violating the terms  
             of his/her parole.

          This bill:

           1. Provides that the parole authority shall revoke the person's  
             parole and requires that he/she be incarcerated in the county  
             jail for 180 days. 

           2. Exempts the removal or disabling of an electronic, GPS, or  
             other monitoring device by a physician, emergency medical  
             services technician, or by any other emergency response or  
             medical personnel when doing so is necessary during the  
             course of medical treatment of the person subject to the  
             electronic, GPS, or other monitoring device. 

           3. Exempts the removal or disabling of the electronic, GPS, or  
             other monitoring device is authorized or required by a court,  
             or by the law enforcement, probation, parole authority, or  
             other entity responsible for placing the electronic, GPS, or  
             other monitoring device upon the person, or that has, at the  
             time, the authority and responsibility to monitor the  
             electronic, GPS, or other monitoring device.

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                      SB 57
                                                                     Page  
          3


           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  Yes

          According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, increased  
          local incarceration costs, potentially in the low millions of  
          dollars statewide, for mandatory six-month jail terms.  While  
          there is no direct state cost, adding more inmates to realigned  
          county jails could affect future realignment formula  
          discussions, as well as add to local jail overcrowding, which  
          decreases the state's option to contract with local jails for  
          inmate beds, which is one of the proposed strategies in the  
          state's response to the three-judge panel order regarding inmate  
          population reduction. 

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  9/12/13)

          Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs
          California District Attorneys Association
          California Narcotic Officers' Association
          California Police Chiefs Association
          Crime Victims Action Alliance
          Crime Victims United of California
          Golden State Bail Agents Association
          Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office 
          Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department
          Los Angeles Police Protective League
          Los Angeles Probation Officers Union, AFSCME Local 685
          Riverside Sheriffs' Association

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  9/11/13)

          American Civil Liberties Union
          California Attorneys for Criminal Justice
          California Public Defenders Association
          Friends Committee on Legislation
          Legal Service for Prisoners with Children
          Taxpayers for Improving Public Safety

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    Los Angeles County District Attorney's  
          Office writes:

            For the last several months there have been a number of news  
            reports regarding the number of high risk sex offender  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                      SB 57
                                                                     Page  
          4

            parolees removing or disarming their GPS.  For example, in  
            February of this year, the Los Angeles Times reported  
            thousands of paroled child molesters, rapists and other  
            high-risk sex offenders in California are removing or  
            disarming their court-ordered GPS tracking devices - and some  
            have been charged with new crimes including sexual battery,  
            kidnapping and attempted manslaughter.  The offenders have  
            discovered that they can disable the monitors, often with  
            little risk of serving time for it, a Times investigation has  
            found.  The jails are too full to hold them.   "It's a huge  
            problem," said Fresno parole agent Matt Hill.  "If the public  
            knew, they'd be shocked.  Paige St. John, Los Angeles Times,  
            Paroled sex offenders disarming tracking devices" (Feb. 23,  
            2013).

            A particularly disturbing case in San Joaquin County involves  
            a parolee who had been sanctioned with jail time and released  
            early from jail several times - and after the last time  
            murdered his grandmother in her home.

            Our office believes that SB 57 will serve as a deterrent to  
            many parolees who would otherwise remove/disable their GPS  
            monitoring devices.  We believe that the current lack of a  
            swift and certain punishment for this behavior has played a  
            significant reason for the nearly 400% increase in the number  
            of parolees who willfully removed/disabled their GPS  
            monitoring devices in the first 15 months following the start  
            of realignment.  

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    California Attorneys for Criminal  
          Justice writes:

            This bill is one of many attempts in the current Legislative  
            session to chip away at the realignment of our corrections  
            priorities, as modified by AB 109, by requiring paroles who  
            disable their electronic global positioning system (GPS)  
            monitoring device to serve up to 3 years in state prison  
            rather than local jails.

            We must not forget, the policy changes made in An 109 were the  
            product of several key factors and problems.  First and  
            foremost, California had so many people in state prison that  
            the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a finding that the conditions  
            amounted to cruel punishment.  Secondly, the enormous cost of  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                      SB 57
                                                                     Page  
          5

            long-term incarceration and parole revocations for even minor  
            offenders was contributing to the budget crisis and fueling  
            public cries for fiscal reform.  Finally, realignment was  
            based on scientific research which demonstrated that these  
            programs and practices reduce recidivism at lower cost, to  
            benefit both offenders and their communities.  (See Penal Code  
            §§17.5 and 14504.)

            Prior to realignment, California's recidivism rates were  
            higher than the national average and it was abundantly clear  
            that our policies of parole supervision and revocation were  
            not protecting public safety.  As recently as this month, a  
            three- 
            judge panel upheld the courts order for California to reduce  
            its prison population.  SB 57 only adds to the existing  
            problem of overcrowding.  
           

          JG:k  9/12/13   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****






















                                                                CONTINUED