Senate Concurrent ResolutionNo. 62


Introduced by Senator Jackson

(Coauthors: Senators Corbett, Evans, Hancock, Liu, and Pavley)

(Coauthors: Assembly Members Garcia, Lowenthal, and Skinner)

July 11, 2013


Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 62—Relative to women on corporate boards.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SCR 62, as introduced, Jackson. Corporations: boards of directors: representation: women.

This measure would encourage equitable and diverse gender representation on corporate boards, and urge that, within a 3-year period from January 2014 to December 2016, inclusive, every publicly held corporation in California with 9 or more director seats have a minimum of 3 women on its board, every publicly held corporation in California with 5 to 8 director seats have a minimum of 2 women on its board, and every publicly held corporation in California with fewer than 5 director seats have a minimum of one woman on its board.

Fiscal committee: no.

P1    1WHEREAS, The 2012-2013 University of California, Davis,
2Study of California Women Business Leaders found the following:
3(1) there is only one woman for every nine men among directors
4and the highest-paid executives, (2) no company has a
5gender-balanced board or management team, (3) 44.8 percent of
6California’s companies have no women directors; (4) 34 percent
7have only one woman director, (5) among counties with at least
820 companies, San Francisco County has the greatest percentage
9of women directors (15.5 percent) and Orange County has the least
P1    1(7.7 percent), (6) firms in the semiconductor industries and those
2located in the Silicon Valley tended to include fewer women on
3the board and in the highest-paid executive positions, and (7) firms
4in the consumer goods sector had the highest average percentage
5of women directors and highest-paid executives; and

6WHEREAS, A McKinsey and Company study entitled “Women
7Matter” showed that companies where women are most strongly
8represented at board or top-management levels are also the
9companies that perform the best, companies with three or more
10women in senior management functions score more highly, on
11average, on the organizational performance profile than companies
12with no women at the top, and performance increases significantly
13once a certain critical mass is attained: specifically, when there
14are at least three women on management committees with an
15average membership of 10 people; and

16WHEREAS, An Oklahoma State University study found that
17board diversity, including gender and ethnicity, is associated with
18improved financial value and that study also found that a significant
19positive relationship between the fraction of women or minorities
20on the board and firm value; and

21WHEREAS, A report entitled “Women Directors on Corporate
22Boards” found that gender diversity on corporate boards contributes
23to more effective corporate governance and to positive governance
24outcomes through a variety of board processes as well as through
25individual interactions; that women directors contribute to
26important firm-level outcomes as they play direct roles as leaders
27and mentors, as well as indirect roles as symbols of opportunity
28for other women, and inspire those women to achieve and stay
29with their firms, and that more recognition is needed for the
30valuable contribution of women directors to firm value; and

31WHEREAS, Credit Suisse conducted a six-year global research
32study, commencing in 2006, of more than 2,000 companies
33worldwide that showed that women on boards improve business
34performance by key metrics, including stock performance, as
35demonstrated by the fact that companies with a market
36capitalization of more than $10 billion, whose boards have women,
37outperformed shares of comparable businesses with all-male boards
38by 26 percent; and

39WHEREAS, The Credit Suisse report included the following
40findings: (1) there has been a greater correlation between stock
P3    1performance and the presence of women on a board since the
2financial crisis in 2008, (2) companies with women on their boards
3significantly outperformed others when the recession occurred,
4(3) companies with women on their boards tend to be somewhat
5risk averse and carry less debt, on average, and (4) net income
6growth for companies with women on their boards averaged 14
7percent over a six-year period, compared with 10 percent for those
8with no women directors; and

9WHEREAS, According to the study entitled “Women Directors
10on Corporate Boards: From Tokenism to Critical Mass” and a
11report entitled, “Critical Mass on Corporate Boards: Why Three
12or More Women Enhance Governance,” attaining critical mass,
13going from one or two women directors to at least three women
14directors, creates an environment where women are no longer seen
15as outsiders and are able to influence the content and process of
16board discussions more substantially, and boards of directors need
17to have at least three women to enable them to interact and exercise
18an influence on the working style, processes, and tasks of the board,
19in turn positively affecting the level of organizational innovation
20within the firm; now, therefore, be it

21Resolved by the Senate of the State of California, the Assembly
22thereof concurring,
That the Legislature acknowledges that the
23body of evidence to date concludes that companies perform better
24when their boards and executive leadership include women, and
25that the State of California has a significant stake in both protecting
26the shareholders of publicly traded companies, as well as setting
27policies that enable them to perform better; and be it further

28Resolved, That the Legislature, supported by the California
29Legislative Women’s Caucus and the National Association of
30Women Business Owners California, encourages equitable and
31diverse gender representation on corporate boards, and urges that,
32within a three-year period from January 2014 to December 2016,
33inclusive, every publicly held corporation in California with nine
34or more director seats have a minimum of three women on its
35board, every publicly held corporation in California with five to
36eight director seats have a minimum of two women on its board,
37and every publicly held corporation in California with fewer than
38five director seats have a minimum of one woman on its board;
39and be it further

P4    1Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate transmit copies of
2this resolution to the author for appropriate distribution.



O

    99