BILL NUMBER: SB 135	CHAPTERED
	BILL TEXT

	CHAPTER  342
	FILED WITH SECRETARY OF STATE  SEPTEMBER 24, 2013
	APPROVED BY GOVERNOR  SEPTEMBER 24, 2013
	PASSED THE SENATE  SEPTEMBER 12, 2013
	PASSED THE ASSEMBLY  SEPTEMBER 12, 2013
	AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY  SEPTEMBER 11, 2013
	AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY  SEPTEMBER 6, 2013
	AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY  SEPTEMBER 3, 2013
	AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY  AUGUST 14, 2013
	AMENDED IN SENATE  MAY 24, 2013
	AMENDED IN SENATE  APRIL 2, 2013

INTRODUCED BY   Senator Padilla
   (Coauthors: Senators Hancock, Hill, Lieu, and Liu)
   (Coauthors: Assembly Members Bloom, Blumenfield, Cooley, Gordon,
Jones-Sawyer, Mullin, and Skinner)

                        JANUARY 28, 2013

   An act to add and repeal Section 8587.8 of the Government Code,
relating to earthquake safety.


	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


   SB 135, Padilla. Earthquake early warning system.
   There is in state government, pursuant to the Governor's
Reorganization Plan No. 2, operative July 1, 2013, the Office of
Emergency Services. Existing law requires the office to develop and
distribute an educational pamphlet for use by kindergarten, any of
grades 1 to 12, inclusive, and community college personnel to
identify and mitigate the risks posed by nonstructural earthquake
hazards.
   This bill would require the office, in collaboration with various
entities, including the United States Geological Survey, to develop a
comprehensive statewide earthquake early warning system in
California through a public-private partnership and would require the
system to include certain features, including the installation of
field sensors. The bill would require the office to develop an
approval mechanism, as provided, to review compliance with earthquake
early warning standards as they are developed. The bill would
require the office to identify funding sources for the system. The
bill would prohibit the office from identifying the General Fund as a
funding source to establish the system, beyond those components or
programs that are currently funded. The bill would make these
provisions contingent upon the office identifying funding sources for
the system, as provided. If no funding sources are identified by
January 1, 2016, the bill would repeal these provisions.



THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

  SECTION 1.  (a) The Legislature finds and declares all of the
following:
   (1) According to the United States Geological Survey, California
is one of the most seismically active states, second only to Alaska.
   (2) California has experienced dozens of disastrous earthquakes,
which have caused loss of life, injury, and economic loss. Some of
the most significant earthquakes in California's history include:
   (A) The 1906 San Francisco earthquake, which, at a magnitude of
7.8, resulted in an estimated 3,000 deaths and over $500 million in
property losses.
   (B) The 1971 San Fernando earthquake, which, at a magnitude of
6.7, resulted in at least 65 deaths and caused property damage of
over $500 million.
   (C) The 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, which, at a magnitude of 6.9,
caused 63 fatalities and over $6 billion in property damage.
   (D) The 1994 Northridge earthquake, which, at a magnitude of 6.7,
claimed the lives of 60 people and caused estimated property damage
of between $13 and $32 billion.
   (3) About 90 percent of the world's earthquakes and over 80
percent of the world's largest earthquakes occur along the
Circum-Pacific Belt, also known as the Pacific Ring of Fire. The
Pacific Ring of Fire includes the very active San Andreas Fault Zone
in California.
   (4) The Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF)
released in 2008 predicted a 99.7 percent likelihood of a magnitude
6.7 or larger earthquake in California in the next 30 years.
   (5) A 2013 study published by the California Institute of
Technology (Caltech) and the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science
and Technology discovered that a statewide California earthquake
involving both the Los Angeles and San Francisco metropolitan areas
may be possible.
   (6) Japan, Taiwan, Mexico, Turkey, Romania, Italy, and China
either have or are working on earthquake early warning systems that
are capable of saving lives and helping to mitigate loss.
   (7) The Office of Emergency Services, Caltech, California
Geological Survey, University of California, United States Geological
Survey, and others have been conducting earthquake early warning
research and development in California. They operate the California
Integrated Seismic Network, which has a demonstration earthquake
early warning capability.
   (8) By building upon the California Integrated Seismic Network and
processing data from an array of sensors throughout the state, a
fully developed earthquake early warning system would effectively
detect some strength and progression of earthquakes and alert the
public within seconds, sometimes up to 60 seconds, before potentially
damaging ground shaking is felt.
   (9) An earthquake early warning system should disseminate
earthquake information in support of public safety, emergency
response, and loss mitigation.
   (b) It is the intent of the Legislature that the establishment of
an earthquake early warning system pursuant to this act shall not
result in any undue burden upon the General Fund and that, to the
maximum extent possible, the Office of Emergency Services shall seek
other sources for funding the implementation of Section 8587.8 of the
Government Code.
  SEC. 2.  Section 8587.8 is added to the Government Code, to read:
   8587.8.  (a) The Office of Emergency Services, in collaboration
with the California Institute of Technology (Caltech), the California
Geological Survey, the University of California, the United States
Geological Survey, the Alfred E. Alquist Seismic Safety Commission,
and other stakeholders, shall develop a comprehensive statewide
earthquake early warning system in California through a
public-private partnership, which shall include, but not be limited
to, the following features:
   (1) Installation of field sensors.
   (2) Improvement of field telemetry.
   (3) Construction and testing of central processing and
notification centers.
   (4) Establishment of warning notification distribution paths to
the public.
   (5) Integration of earthquake early warning education with general
earthquake preparedness efforts.
   (b) In consultation with stakeholders, the Office of Emergency
Services shall develop an approval mechanism to review compliance
with earthquake early warning standards as they are developed. The
development of the approval mechanism shall include input from a
broad representation of earthquake early warning stakeholders. The
approval mechanism shall accomplish all of the following:
   (1) Ensure the standards are appropriate.
   (2) Determine the degree to which the standards apply to providers
and components of the system.
   (3) Determine methods to ensure compliance with the standards.
   (4) Determine requirements for participation in the system.
   (c) The Office of Emergency Services shall identify funding for
the system described in subdivision (a) through single or multiple
sources of revenue that shall be limited to federal funds, funds from
revenue bonds, local funds, and private grants. The Office of
Emergency Services shall not identify the General Fund as a funding
source for the purpose of establishing the system described in
subdivision (a), beyond the components or programs that are currently
funded.
   (d) Subdivisions (a) and (b) shall not become operative until the
Office of Emergency Services identifies funding pursuant to
subdivision (c).
   (e) (1) If funding is not identified pursuant to subdivision (c)
by January 1, 2016, this section is repealed unless a later enacted
statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2016, deletes or extends
that date.
   (2) The Office of Emergency Services shall file with the Secretary
of State its determination that funding was not identified pursuant
to subdivision (c) by January 1, 2016.