BILL ANALYSIS �
SB 137
Page 1
Date of Hearing: July 3, 2013
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Mike Gatto, Chair
SB 137 (Emmerson) - As Introduced: January 28, 2013
Policy Committee: Human
ServicesVote:7 - 0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill requires regional centers (RC) under contract with the
Department of Developmental Services (DDS) to make specific
information available on their websites. Specifically, this bill
requires the posting of the following information:
1)Actual rates paid to each vendor.
2)Any public funds provided to a nonprofit housing organization
outside of the regular request for proposal process.
FISCAL EFFECT
1)One-time GF costs between $100,000 and $200,000 for DDS to
adopt implementing regulations.
2)One-time GF costs likely in excess of $200,000 for 21 Regional
Centers (RCs), combined, to gather and report the information
required, particularly the actual rates paid to vendors.
On-going GF costs in the between $25,000 and $50,000 to
maintain and update the required information.
This bill establishes statewide requirements on the 21 RCs,
which are non-profit, nonpublic entities, serving 260,000
consumers via approximately 65,000 providers, including
parents of consumers.
COMMENTS
1)Purpose . The author's intent is to require the 21 RCs to
disclose additional information on their websites in order to
SB 137
Page 2
increase transparency in the DDS system. Each of the 21
centers operates independently under a non-profit status and
is funded entirely with state money. The author contends that
the RCs use their non-profit status to deny requestors
information that would typically be covered under the
California Public Records Act.
2)Budget Trailer Bill . To promote transparency, a 2011-12
Budget Trailer Bill pertaining to DDS and the RCs, SB 74
(Committee on Budget & Fiscal Review; Chapter 9, Statutes of
2011), requires each RC to adopt, maintain, and post on its
Internet Web site a board-approved policy regarding
transparency and access to public information. In addition,
each RC is required to post certain information, including
fiscal audits, annual reports, contract awards, names and
addresses of all vendors, and board meeting agendas.
3)Related Legislation . AB 1554 (Jeffries/ Silva) of 2012,
contained language identical to the provisions of this bill.
That bill was held on this committee's Suspense File.
AB 862 (Silva & Jeffries), 2011, was similar to this bill but
included additional items to be posted on RC Web sites and
required semiannual updates of vendor rates. AB 862 was
vetoed by Gov. Brown. The veto message referred to the
inclusion of one of the items required to be posted (related
to conflict-of-interest statements), which is not included in
this bill.
Analysis Prepared by : Julie Salley-Gray / APPR. / (916)
319-2081