BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                            Senator Kevin de León, Chair


          SB 199 (de León) - BB devices.
          
          Amended: January 6, 2014        Policy Vote: Public Safety 5-1
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: Yes
          Hearing Date: January 21, 2014                          
          Consultant: Jolie Onodera       
          
          This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File.
          
          
          Bill Summary: SB 199 would prohibit the sale or manufacture of  
          BB devices, as defined, unless the entire exterior surface of  
          the device is brightly colored or transparent, as specified.  
          This bill would also expand the definition of "BB device" to  
          include instruments that expel a projectile of any size through  
          the force of air pressure, gas pressure, or spring action. 

          Fiscal Impact: 
              Non-reimbursable local enforcement costs offset to a degree  
              by fine revenue to the extent the restrictions on the sale  
              and manufacture of imitation firearms to include BB devices  
              result in increased violations of current law related to  
              imitation firearms.
              Potential near-term loss of sales tax revenue of $40,000  
              (General Fund) for every $1 million in annual BB device  
              sales impacted in California to the extent the restrictions  
              on the purchase, sale, and manufacture of imitation firearms  
              result in reduced sales of BB devices. Future year impact  
              could be somewhat mitigated to the extent consumers shift to  
              purchases of alternative devices.
              Potential court-related costs (General Fund*) for  
              additional misdemeanor and/or civil court filings resulting  
              from increased violations of law pertaining to imitation  
              firearms.
              While the impact of this bill independently on local jails  
              is likely to be minor, the cumulative effect of expanded  
              misdemeanors could create General Fund cost pressure on  
              capital outlay, staffing, programming, the courts, and other  
              resources in the context of criminal justice realignment. 
              Potential future cost savings in medical, emergency  
              services, administrative and criminal justice costs to the  
              extent the provisions of this bill reduce the incidence of  








          SB 199 (de León)
          Page 1


              firearms-related injuries and death.
          *Trial Court Trust Fund

          Background: In December 2010, a 13-year-old was shot and  
          paralyzed by a city police officer in Los Angeles when officers  
          investigating burglaries came across three youth playing with  
          dark-colored pellet guns in a street at twilight. More recently,  
          on October 22, 2013, a 13-year-old boy from Santa Rosa was  
          tragically shot and killed by Sonoma County Sheriff's deputies  
          who mistook a plastic airsoft gun he was carrying for an actual  
          AK-47 assault rifle. A June 1990 study prepared by the Police  
          Executive Research Forum under a cooperative agreement with the  
          Department of Justice, Toy Guns: Involvement in Crime and  
          Encounters with Police, found that there were over 200 incidents  
          per year in which imitation firearms were mistaken for real  
          firearms. 

          This bill seeks to reduce the incidence of mistaken encounters  
          involving imitation firearms. 

          Existing law prohibits a person from furnishing a BB device,  
          defined to include a spot marker gun, to a minor without the  
          permission of the minor's parent or guardian (Penal Code (PC) §  
          19915), and prohibits selling a BB device to a minor (PC  
          §19910). Violation of either of these prohibitions is a  
          misdemeanor, punishable by up to six months in jail, a fine of  
          up to $1,000, or both. 

          Existing law generally prohibits anyone from purchasing,  
          selling, manufacturing, shipping, transporting, distributing, or  
          receiving an imitation firearm (PC § 20165), subject to specific  
          exceptions. A person is liable for a civil fine of not more than  
          $10,000 for a violation of this prohibition. Existing law  
          excludes BB devices from the definition of imitation firearm for  
          these purposes (PC § 16700(b)(2)).

          Existing law provides that any person who changes, alters,  
          removes, or obliterates any coloration or markings that are  
          required by any applicable state or federal law or regulation  
          for any imitation firearm in a way that makes the imitation  
          firearm or device look more like a firearm, is guilty of a  
          misdemeanor (PC § 20150).

          Proposed Law: This bill would do the following:








          SB 199 (de León)
          Page 2


                 Include BB devices within the definition of "imitation  
               firearm" for purposes of the prohibition of the purchase,  
               sale, manufacture, and distribution of imitation firearms,  
               but exclude spot marker guns that expel a projectile larger  
               than 10 millimeters in caliber.
                 Specify that BB devices are subject to the requirements  
               of PC § 16700, which require all BB devices sold, or  
               manufactured for sale in California be either: 1) white,  
               bright red, bright orange, bright yellow, bright green,  
               bright blue, bright pink, or bright purple, either singly  
               or as the predominant color in combination with other  
               colors in any pattern, or, 2) constructed of transparent or  
               translucent materials which permits unmistakable  
               observation of the device's complete contents.
                 Delete the 6 millimeter caliber restriction on the  
               projectile size from the definition of a BB device.

          Prior Legislation: SB 798 (de León) 2011 would have made the  
          provision imposing a civil fine on the sale, manufacture,  
          transportation, receipt, or distribution of imitation firearms  
          for commercial purposes applicable to BB devices. The bill was  
          later amended to remove the state preemption of any local  
          ordinances regarding the manufacture, sale, or possession of  
          imitation firearms, BB devices, and air rifles. This bill failed  
          passage in Assembly Public Safety.

          AB 2333 (Solorio) 2012 would have authorized local law  
          enforcement to issue a warning or impose a $100 fine on a parent  
          when his/her child openly displays or exposes a BB device in a  
          public place, as specified. This bill was vetoed by Governor  
          with the following message: 

              This bill would allow police officers to issue a  
              warning or impose a $100 fine on a parent when their  
              child breaks the law by having a BB gun in a public  
              place. Police officers can already educate parents  
              about accountability and the responsible use of BB  
              guns when appropriate. I urge them to do so.
          
          SB 1315 (de León) Chapter 214/2012 creates an exemption from the  
          general state preemption of the field regarding the regulation  
          of imitation firearms, to allow the County of Los Angeles, and  
          any city within the County of Los Angeles, to enact and enforce  
          an ordinance or resolution that is more restrictive than state  








          SB 199 (de León)
          Page 3


          law regulating the manufacture, sale, possession, or use of any  
          BB device, toy gun, replica of a firearm, or other device, that  
          is so substantially similar to an existing firearm as to lead a  
          reasonable person to perceive that the device is a firearm and  
          expels a projectile that is no more than 16 millimeters in  
          diameter.

          Staff Comments: By expanding the definition of "BB device" and  
          applying the restrictions on the sale and manufacture of  
          imitation firearms to include BB devices, this bill would expand  
          the scope of existing misdemeanor crimes related to imitation  
          firearms. The DOJ reported 433 arrests in 2013 for violations of  
          the prohibition against altering/changing an imitation firearm  
          to look more like a real firearm. To the extent the new  
          coloration requirements on BB devices result in additional  
          violations of this offense would result in increased  
          non-reimbursable local enforcement costs offset to a degree by  
          fine revenue.

          To the extent the coloration requirements applied to BB devices  
          have the effect of reducing the number of BB devices sold in  
          California, there would be an impact to both local and state  
          sales tax revenues. The Board of Equalization estimates that  
          Californians spend approximately $9 million annually on BB  
          device purchases (based on the estimated California population  
          share of a U.S. estimate made by IBISWorld-Industry Market  
          Research). For every $1 million reduction in annual sales, state  
          sales tax revenues are estimated to be impacted by approximately  
          $40,000 (General Fund). It is estimated that the impact is  
          likely in the near term, with the impact in future years  
          projected to be somewhat mitigated to the extent consumers shift  
          to purchases of alternative devices.

          The creation of new or expanded misdemeanors has historically  
          been analyzed by this Committee to result in non-reimbursable  
          state mandated costs for local law enforcement and  
          incarceration. Staff notes, however, that the creation and  
          expansion of misdemeanors taken cumulatively could increase the  
          statewide adult jail population to a degree that could  
          potentially impact the flexibility of counties to manage their  
          jail populations recently exacerbated under 2011 Public Safety  
          Realignment. While the provisions of this bill are likely to be  
          minor, the cumulative effect of all new misdemeanors could  
          create unknown General Fund cost pressure on capital outlay,  








          SB 199 (de León)
          Page 4


          staffing, programming, the courts, and other resources.

          To the extent the provisions of this bill serve to reduce the  
          incidence of firearms-related injuries and death, could result  
          in potential future cost savings. A study by the non-profit  
          Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE) reported  
          over 105,000 incidences of firearm injury and death in 2010  
          nationally, with an estimated societal cost of over $174 billion  
          in work lost, medical care, insurance, criminal justice  
          expenses, and pain and suffering.  At a unit level, the study  
          reported a governmental cost of $187,000 to $582,000 per firearm  
          fatality in medical and mental health care, emergency services,  
          and administrative and criminal justice costs. The estimated  
          societal cost per firearm injury or fatality, including lost  
          work productivity and quality of life was reported at nearly  
          $430,000 to $5 million, respectively. 

          Recommended Amendments: This bill revises and expands the  
          definition of "BB device" to remove any reference to the size of  
          the projectile. For code clarity and to ensure the revised  
          definition is not interpreted to include toy guns (which expel  
          projectiles through the force of air pressure or spring action),  
          which could inadvertently create violations of current law to  
          sell or furnish these types of devices to minors under PC  
          §§19910 and 19915, the author may wish to consider an amendment  
          as follows: 

          As used in this part, "BB device" means any instrument that  
          expels a projectile, such as a BB or a pellet,  not exceeding 6mm  
          caliber,   but not including a toy gun  , through the force of air  
          pressure, gas pressure, or spring action, or any spot marker  
          gun.