BILL ANALYSIS �
SB 208
Page 1
Date of Hearing: September 11, 2013
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Mike Gatto, Chair
SB 208 (Lara) - As Amended: September 6, 2013
Policy Committee: HealthVote:18-0
Human Services Vote: 7-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill establishes requirements for requests for proposals
(RFPs) for services procured by regional centers under contract
with the Department of Developmental Services (DDS), and removes
a prohibition on a specified payment method for Medi-Cal managed
care plans subcontracts. Specifically, this bill:
1)Requires an RFP prepared by a regional center for consumer
services and supports to include a section on issues of equity
and diversity, and requires an RFP that applies only to
specific consumers to instead request information on how the
applicant plans to provide culturally and linguistically
competent services to those specific consumers.
2)Deletes a prohibition on Medi-Cal managed care plans entering
into subcontracts in which payment is determined by a
percentage of the plan's payment from the Department of Health
Care Services (DHCS), allowing these arrangements unless DHCS
objects.
FISCAL EFFECT
Minor and absorbable costs to DHCS for health plan oversight,
and to DDS to modify RFPs.
COMMENTS
1)Rationale . The author indicates the provision related to
Medi-Cal managed care plans is necessary to allow health plans
to subcontract on a consistent basis for Medicare and Medi-Cal
services. The author notes it is important to change this
SB 208
Page 2
prohibition now, given this mechanism is used for Medicare
payments and some plans will be subcontracting for Medi-Cal
and Medicare services on a combined basis through a
demonstration project beginning in 2014. Provisions related
to regional centers seek to address disparities in access to
services by prompting providers to indicate their capacity for
serving diverse populations.
2)Percent of Premium Prohibition . Paying a subcontractor based
on a percentage of the payment received from DHCS to be a
reasonable payment mechanism, since Medi-Cal payments received
by plans are adjusted to reflect expected health care
utilization. The current-law prohibition appears to have been
associated with a targeted effort to combat fraud in Medi-Cal
managed care in the late 1970's, when plans were less tightly
regulated.
Analysis Prepared by : Lisa Murawski / APPR. / (916) 319-2081