SB 210, as introduced, Hancock. Criminal procedure: release on defendant’s own recognizance.
(1) Existing law provides that a defendant who is in custody and arraigned for a misdemeanor offense, or who has been arrested upon an out-of-county warrant arising from a case involving only misdemeanors, is entitled to be released on his or her own recognizance unless the court finds that the release will compromise public safety or will not reasonably ensure the appearance of the defendant, in which case the court is required to set bail and specify conditions, if any, for release.
This bill would authorize a court to determine, at the time of arraignment in any case that is before a court concerning the commission of a felony punishable by imprisonment in a county jail, whether a defendant who is still in custody may be released on his or her own recognizance. In making this decision, the bill would require the court to determine whether the release will compromise public safety. The bill would authorize the court to consider, in its discretion, imposing on the defendant any reasonable conditions it deems appropriate, and would authorize the court to require supervision by any designated local agency, to ensure public safety and to ensure the defendant’s appearance. The bill would require the court to set bail if release will compromise public safety or will not reasonably ensure the appearance of the defendant.
(2) Existing law requires a judge or magistrate, in setting, reducing, or denying bail, to take into consideration the protection of the public, the seriousness of the offense, the defendant’s previous criminal record, and the probability of the defendant appearing at trial or a hearing.
This bill would revise the factors that the judge or magistrate would be required to consider to, among other things, require the judge or magistrate to consider the history and characteristics of the defendant, and to consider the nature and circumstances of the offense. The bill would require a judge or magistrate to also consider those factors when determining conditions for pretrial release.
(3) Existing law authorizes a court, with the concurrence of the county board of supervisors, to employ an investigative staff for the purpose of recommending whether a defendant should be released on his or her own recognizance. In cases involving certain crimes, including violent felonies, an investigative report is required to be prepared that includes specified information, including outstanding warrants against the defendant and prior incidents where the defendant has failed to make a court appearance.
This bill would also authorize a sheriff, county probation department, or other local governmental agency, with the concurrence of the board of supervisors, to employ an investigative staff for those purposes, and would require a pretrial investigative report to be prepared before a court may order a defendant released on his or her own recognizance in any case involving specified crimes, including a violent felony. The bill would authorize the preparation of a pretrial investigation report in all other cases in which a court, sheriff, county probation department, or other local governmental agency has employed an investigative staff to recommend whether the defendant should be released on his or her own recognizance. The bill would require any pretrial investigative report to include the results of an evidence-based pretrial risk assessment, as defined, evaluating the defendant’s probability of appearing at trial and potential risk to public safety. The bill would prohibit, for purposes of preparing the report, a defendant from being interviewed about the facts and circumstances of the defendant’s current offense. The bill would authorize a court, sheriff, county probation department, or other local governmental agency, with the concurrence of the board of supervisors, to employ supervision staff to monitor a defendant’s compliance with release conditions ordered by the court, as specified.
(4) Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by that limitation and the need for protecting that interest.
This bill would make legislative findings and declarations relating to, among other things, the necessity of treating pretrial investigation reports as confidential in order for pretrial programs to function properly.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:
3(a) Pretrial custody reform is urgently needed in California,
4where the pretrial population far exceeds the national average of
561 percent. More than 71 percent of the 71,000 Californians held
6in county jails statewide on any given day are awaiting trial.
7(b) Pretrial custody reform will support the implementation of
8public safety realignment by providing counties greater flexibility
9in managing their pretrial populations using best practices
10developed over many years across many jurisdictions.
11(c) Pretrial services programs have been successfully
12
implemented in many jurisdictions, and have helped to reduce the
13pretrial jail populations, save money, reduce recidivism, and protect
14the public.
15(d) Increasing the use of evidence-based practices in pretrial
16population management programs will allow better empirical
17analysis in pretrial decisions, and will help to ensure that the court’s
18decision to order release, conditions of release, and bail is based
19on a credible assessment of the defendant’s risk to public safety
20and the likelihood of appearance as required.
21(e) In order for pretrial programs to function properly and to
22protect the rights of persons submitting sensitive information, it
23is essential to treat pretrial investigation reports as confidential so
24the reports are used only for release, bail, and monitoring
25considerations.
Section 1270 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
(a) Any person who has been arrested for, or charged
2with, an offense other than a capital offense may be released on
3his or her own recognizance by a court or magistrate who could
4release a defendant from custody upon the defendant giving bail,
5including a defendant arrested upon an out-of-county warrant. A
6defendant who is in custody and is arraigned on a complaint
7alleging an offense which is a misdemeanor, and a defendant who
8appears before a court or magistrate upon an out-of-county warrant
9arising out of a case involving only misdemeanors,begin delete shall beend deletebegin insert isend insert
10 entitled to an own recognizance release
unless the court makes a
11finding on the record, in accordance with Section 1275, that an
12own recognizance release will compromise public safety or will
13not reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required.
14Public safety shall be the primary consideration. If the court makes
15one of those findings, the court shallbegin delete thenend delete set bail and specify the
16conditions, if any, whereunder the defendant shall be released.
17(b) The court shall determine, at the time of arraignment,
18whether a defendant who is still in custody, and is charged with
19a felony, the sentence for which may be served in a county jail
20pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170, is eligible for release
21on his or her own recognizance and to be ordered to appear, as
22required. Public safety shall be the primary
consideration in this
23determination. In granting an own recognizance release, a court
24may consider, in its discretion, imposing on the defendant any
25reasonable conditions it deems appropriate, and may require
26supervision by any designated local agency, to ensure public safety
27and to ensure the defendant’s appearance.
28(c) If the judge or magistrate finds that release pursuant to
29subdivision (b) will compromise public safety or will not
30reasonably ensure the appearance of the defendant, as required,
31the court shall then set bail as is reasonably necessary to ensure
32the appearance of the defendant. A judge or magistrate may set
33bail in an amount less than what is specified in the county bail
34schedule, where he or she determines that
the amount specified in
35the county bail schedule is higher than necessary to reasonably
36ensure the appearance of the defendant. In making this
37determination, the court may consider information included in a
38pretrial services report, prepared in accordance with Section
391318.1, if one is available.
40(b)
end delete
P5 1begin insert(d)end insert Article 9 (commencing with Section 1318) shall apply to
2any person who is released pursuant to this section.
Section 1275 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
(a) Inbegin insert determining conditions for pretrial release, and
5inend insert setting, reducing, or denying bail, the judge or magistrate shallbegin insert,
6on the available information,end insert take into consideration the protection
7of the public, thebegin delete seriousnessend deletebegin insert nature and circumstancesend insert of the
8offense charged,begin insert the history and characteristics of
the defendant,end insert
9
the previous criminal record of the defendant,begin insert including whether
10the defendant was, at the time of arrest for the charged offense,
11on probation, parole, or other form of release pending trial,
12sentencing, or appeal,end insert and the probability of his or her appearing
13at trial or hearing of the casebegin insert, including the defendant’s record of
14appearance at past court hearings or of flight to avoid arrest or
15prosecutionend insert.begin delete The publicend deletebegin insert Publicend insert safety shall be the primary
16consideration.
17(b) In considering the history and characteristics of the
18defendant, the judge or magistrate may consider any of the
19following:
20(1) The ties of the defendant to the community, including his or
21her employment, the duration of his or her residence, and the
22defendant’s family attachments.
23(2) The defendant’s current educational or vocational program
24enrollment and participation.
25(3) The physical and mental condition of the defendant and the
26defendant’s history related to dependence on alcohol or controlled
27substances, including past and current participation in substance
28abuse programs and counseling.
29begin insert(c)end insertbegin insert end insertIn considering thebegin delete seriousnessend deletebegin insert
nature and circumstancesend insert of
30the offense charged, the judge or magistrate shall include
31consideration of the alleged injury to the victim, and alleged threats
32to the victim or a witness to the crime charged, the alleged use of
33a firearm or other deadly weapon in the commission of the crime
34charged, and the alleged use or possession of controlled substances
35by the defendant.
36(b)
end delete
37begin insert(d)end insert In considering offenses wherein a violation of Chapter 6
38(commencing with Section 11350) of Division 10 of the Health
39and Safety Code is alleged, the judge or magistrate shall consider
40the following: (1) the alleged amounts of controlled substances
P6 1involved in
the commission of the offense, and (2) whether the
2defendant is currently released on bail for an alleged violation of
3Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 11350) of Division 10 of the
4Health and Safety Code.
5(c)
end delete
6begin insert(e)end insert Before a court reduces bail below the amount established
7by the bail schedule approved for the county, in accordance with
8subdivisions (b) and (c) of Section 1269b, for a person charged
9with a serious felony, as defined in subdivision (c) of Section
101192.7, or a violent felony, as defined in subdivision (c) of Section
11667.5, the court shall make a finding of unusual circumstances and
12shall set forth those facts on the record. For purposes of this
13subdivision,
“unusual circumstances” does not include the fact
14that the defendant has made all prior court appearances or has not
15committed any new offenses.
Section 1318.1 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
(a) A court,begin insert sheriff, county probation department, or
18other local governmental agency,end insert with the concurrence of the
19board of supervisors, may employ an investigative staff for the
20purpose of recommending whether a defendant should be released
21on his or her own recognizance.
22(b) Whenever a courtbegin insert, sheriff, county probation department, or
23other local governmental agencyend insert has employed an investigative
24staff pursuant to subdivision (a),begin delete an investigative report shall be begin insert
before a court may order a defendant released
25prepared in all casesend delete
26on his or her own recognizance in any caseend insert involving a violent
27felony, as described in subdivision (c) of Section 667.5, or a felony
28in violation of subdivision (a) of Section 23153 of the Vehicle
29Code,begin insert a pretrial investigative report shall be preparedend insert
30 recommending whether the defendant should be released on his
31or her own recognizance. The report shall include all of the
32following:
33(1) Written verification of any outstanding warrants against the
34defendant.
35(2) Written verification of any prior incidents where the
36defendant has failed to make a court appearance.
37(3) Written verification of the criminal record of the defendant.
38(4) Written verification of the residence of the defendant during
39the past year.
P7 1After the report is certified pursuant to this subdivision, it shall
2be submitted to the court for review, prior to a hearing held
3pursuant to Section 1319.
4(c) Whenever a court, sheriff, county probation department, or
5other local governmental agency has employed an investigative
6staff pursuant to subdivision (a), a pretrial investigation report
7may be prepared in any case not involving a violent felony, as
8described in subdivision (c) of Section 667.5, or a felony in
9violation of subdivision (a) of Section 23153 of the Vehicle Code,
10recommending whether the defendant should be released on his
11or her own recognizance. Only one agency authorized pursuant
12to
subdivision (a) shall issue a pretrial investigation report.
13(d) Any report prepared pursuant to subdivision (b) or (c) shall
14include all of the results of an evidence-based pretrial risk
15assessment evaluating the defendant’s probability of appearing
16at trial and potential risk to public safety. “Evidence-based pretrial
17risk assessment” is the objective, standardized analysis of
18information about a pretrial defendant in a way that is consistent
19with and guided by the best available scientific evidence and
20professional knowledge that measures the risk of the defendant’s
21probability of appearing at trial and the potential risk to public
22safety while pending case disposition.
23(e) In preparing the report pursuant to subdivision (b) or (c),
24the defendant shall not be interviewed about the facts and
25circumstances of the current offense, and any information that a
26defendant may provide shall not be included in the report. Any
27information provided by the defendant shall be used solely for the
28purposes of determining whether the defendant should be released
29on his or her own recognizance or in setting the conditions of the
30defendant’s release or modifying a prior release order. The reports
31may be filed as part of the case record.
32(f) A court,
sheriff, county probation department, or other local
33governmental agency may, with the concurrence of the board of
34supervisors, employ supervision staff to monitor the defendant’s
35compliance with the release conditions ordered by the court.
36Supervision staff may do any of the following:
37(1) Notify the defendant of court appearance obligations.
end insertbegin insert
38(2) Require the defendant to report periodically by mail,
39telephone,
or personal appearance to verify compliance with
40release conditions.
P8 1(3) Monitor and assist the defendant with complying with
2release conditions.
3(4) Supervise a defendant placed on home detention, with or
4without electronic monitoring, as a condition of release.
5(5) Promptly report violations of release conditions to the court.
end insertbegin insert
6(6) Provide information to assist any law enforcement officer
7with detaining a defendant supervised pursuant to this section and
8for whom a bench warrant has been issued.
9(c)
end delete
10begin insert(g)end insert The salaries of the staff are a proper charge against the
11
county.
O
99