BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  SB 279
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  June 12, 2013

                       ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT
                           K.H. "Katcho" Achadjian, Chair
                     SB 279 (Hancock) - As Amended:  May 15, 2013

           SENATE VOTE  :  36-0
           
          SUBJECT  :  San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority.

           SUMMARY  :  Specifies, for the San Francisco Bay Restoration  
          Authority, procedures for conducting a multi-county election to  
          approve a special tax measure for the Authority.  Specifically,  
           this bill  :   

          1)Requires the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority (SFBRA)  
            to file with the board of supervisors of each county in which  
            the special tax measure shall appear on the ballot a  
            resolution requesting consolidation, and setting forth the  
            exact form of the ballot question, in accordance with  
            provisions in the Elections Code related to the consolidation  
            of elections.

          2)Requires SFBRA to transmit a copy of the measure to the legal  
            counsel, and requires the legal counsel to prepare an  
            impartial analysis of the measure in accordance with  
            provisions in the Elections Code which provide for the  
            preparation of an impartial analysis.

          3)Requires the impartial analysis prepared by the legal counsel  
            to be subject to review and revision by the county counsel of  
            the county that contains the largest population, as determined  
            by the most recent federal decennial census, among those  
            counties in which the measure will be submitted to the voters.

          4)Requires, if there is no legal counsel for SFBRA, the SFBRA to  
            transmit a copy of the measure to the county counsel of the  
            county that contains the largest population, as determined by  
            the most recent federal decennial census, among those counties  
            in which the measure will be submitted to the voters, and  
            requires the county counsel to prepare the impartial analysis.

          5)Requires each county included in the measure to use the exact  
            ballot question, impartial analysis, and ballot language  
            provided by SFBRA.








                                                                  SB 279
                                                                  Page  2


          6)Requires, if two or more counties included in the measure are  
            required to prepare a translation of ballot materials into the  
            same language other than English, the county that contains the  
            largest population as determined by the most recent federal  
            decennial census, among those counties that are required to  
            prepare a translation of ballot materials into the same  
            language other than English, to prepare the translation and  
            requires that translation to be used by the other county or  
            counties, as applicable.

          7)Requires, if a measure proposed by SFBRA is submitted to the  
            voters of SFBRA in two or more counties, the elections  
            officials in those counties to mutually agree to use the same  
            letter designation for the measure.

          8)States that SFBRA is a "district" as defined in the Elections  
            Code, which includes any regional agency that has the power to  
            tax, to regulate land use, or to condemn and purchase land.

          9)Requires a measure proposed by SFBRA that requires voter  
            approval to be submitted to the voters of SFBRA in accordance  
            with the provisions of the Elections Code applicable to  
            district elections and measures submitted to voters.

          10)Specifies that no reimbursement is required by the bill's  
            provisions because the costs are the result of a program for  
            which legislative authority was requested by that local  
            agency, unless the Commission on State Mandates determines  
            that the bill's provisions contains other costs mandated by  
            the state.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Establishes the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority Act.

          2)Finds and declares that the nine counties surrounding the San  
            Francisco Bay constitute a region with unique natural resource  
            and outdoor recreational needs and the importance of  
            protecting and restoring vital wetlands and San Francisco Bay  
            habitat, and that it is in the public interest to create SFBRA  
            as a regional entity.

          3)States that SFBRA's purpose is to raise and allocate resources  
            for the restoration, enhancement, protection, and enjoyment of  








                                                                  SB 279
                                                                  Page  3

            wetlands and wildlife habitats in the San Francisco Bay and  
            along its shoreline.

          4)States the intent of the Legislature that SFBRA should  
            complement existing efforts by cities, counties, districts,  
            the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission,  
            the State Coastal Conservancy, and other local, regional, and  
            state entities, related to addressing the goals, as specified.

          5)Specifies that SFBRA's governing board is composed of seven  
            voting members, as specified, and is subject to the Political  
            Reform Act of 1974.

          6)Authorizes SFBRA to levy a benefit assessment, special tax, or  
            property-related fee consistent with the requirements of  
            Articles XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution, as  
            specified, and allows SFBRA to apply for and receive grants  
            from federal and state agencies, issue revenue bonds, incur  
            bond indebtedness, and enter into joint powers agreements.

          7)Requires, when SFBRA proposes to levy a special tax, the board  
            of supervisors of the county or counties in which the special  
            tax is proposed to be levied, to call a special election on  
            the measure.  

          8)Requires the special election shall be consolidated with the  
            next regularly scheduled statewide election and the measure  
            shall be submitted to the voters in the appropriate counties,  
            consistent with the requirements of Article XIIIC and XIIID of  
            the California Constitution.

          9)Requires each county included in the measure to use the ballot  
            question, title and summary, and ballot language provided in  
            the resolution of SFBRA.

          10)Requires the county clerk of each county to report the  
            results of the special election to SFBRA.

          11)Requires the SFBRA Board to provide for regular audits and  
            annual financial reports, and make copies available to the  
            public.

          12)Repeals the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority Act as of  
            January 1, 2029. 









                                                                  SB 279
                                                                  Page  4

          13)Defines a "district" in Elections Code, for purposes of  
            initiative and referendum, to include any regional agency that  
            has the power to tax, to regulate land use, or to condemn and  
            purchase land.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  This bill is keyed fiscal.

           COMMENTS  :   

          1)This bill specifies procedures for conducting a multi-county  
            election to approve a special tax measure proposed by the San  
            Francisco Bay Restoration Authority (SFBRA), and is sponsored  
            by SFBRA.

          2)SFBRA is a regional entity with jurisdiction extending  
            throughout the nine-county San Francisco Bay Area [AB 2954  
            (Lieber), Chapter 690, Statutes of 2008].  SFBRA's purpose is  
            to raise and allocate resources for the restoration,  
            enhancement, protection, and enjoyment of wetlands and  
            wildlife habitats in the San Francisco Bay and along its  
            shoreline.  SFBRA can levy a special tax consistent with the  
            provisions of Proposition 218.  State law requires that each  
            county included in a special tax measure proposed by SFBRA  
            must use the ballot question, title and summary, and ballot  
            language provided in a resolution adopted by SFBRA [AB 2103  
            (Hill), Chapter 373, Statutes of 2010].

          3)According to the author, "This bill will clarify the SFBRA's  
            ability to provide uniform ballot measures across nine  
            counties with the SFBRA's jurisdiction.  SFBRA's mission is to  
            raise local revenues to help restore 36,000 acres of  
            publicly-owned bay shoreline into tidal wetlands.  The  
            estimated cost of such an endeavor is about $1.43 billion over  
            50 years.  Limited state and federal funds are available for  
            these projects, and SB 279 will help clarify how the SFBRA can  
            provide future multi-county ballot measures. 

            "Currently, code does not provide clarity as to how the SFBRA  
            can provide uniform ballot measures across the nine counties  
            in SFBRA's jurisdiction.  For example, who prepares the  
            impartial analysis, who prepares translations of ballot  
            materials, how the ballot material will remain uniform across  
            counties, or if a uniform designation will be used - these are  
            all aspects of a multi-county ballot measure that are  
            unclear."








                                                                  SB 279
                                                                  Page  5


          4)This bill requires SFBRA to file, with the board of  
            supervisors of each county in which a special tax measure will  
            appear on the ballot, a resolution requesting that the  
            election be consolidated with the next regularly scheduled  
            statewide election and setting forth the exact form of the  
            ballot question, in accordance with state law. This bill also  
            requires SFBRA to transmit a copy of the special tax measure  
            to its legal counsel, who must prepare an impartial analysis  
            of the measure in accordance with state law.  The impartial  
            analysis prepared by SFBRA's legal counsel is subject to  
            review and revision by the county counsel of the county that  
            contains the largest population, as determined by the most  
            recent federal census, among the counties in which the measure  
            will be submitted to the voters.  

            If there is no legal counsel for SFBRA, this bill requires  
            SFBRA to transmit a copy of the special tax measure to the  
            county counsel of the county that contains the largest  
            population, as determined by the most recent federal census,  
            among the counties in which the measure will be submitted to  
            the voters and requires the county counsel to prepare the  
            impartial analysis.

            Additionally, this bill requires each county included in the  
            measure to use the exact impartial analysis provided by SFBRA.  
             If two or more counties included in the measure are required  
            to prepare a translation of ballot materials into the same  
            language other than English, the county that contains the  
            largest population, as determined by the most recent federal  
            census, among the counties that are required to prepare a  
            translation of ballot materials into the same language other  
            than English must prepare the translation.  This bill requires  
            the other county or counties to use that translation.

            If a special tax measure proposed by SFBRA is submitted to  
            voters in two or more counties, this bill requires that that  
            the elections officials of those counties must mutually agree  
            to use the same letter designation for the measure.

           5)COMMITTEE AMENDMENTS  .  In order to create consistency with the  
            Elections Code and delete one provision that is not necessary  
            for the bill, the following Committee amendments are proposed  
            for subdivision (d):









                                                                  SB 279
                                                                  Page  6

            (d)  The authority shall transmit a copy of the measure to the  
             The legal counsel for the authority  , who  shall prepare an  
            impartial analysis of the measure  in accordance with Section  
            9313 of the Elections Code  .

           6)Support arguments  :  Supporters argue that the bill will create  
            and ensure uniformity for Bay Area voters in a potential  
            ballot measure and allow SFBRA to continue moving forward in  
            planning and seeking voter approval consistent with its  
            mission.
             
            Opposition arguments  :  None on file.

           










          REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support 
           
          San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority [SPONSOR]
          Bay Area Council
          East Bay Regional Park District
          San Francisco Estuary Partnership
          San Mateo County Economic Development Association
          Save the Bay
          Supervisor Joseph Simitian, County of Santa Clara
          Supervisor Dave Pine, County of San Mateo
          Supervisor Federal Glover, County of Contra Costa
          Supervisor Dave Cortese, County of Santa Clara
          Supervisor Keith Caldwell, County of Napa
          Individual letters (2)
           
            Opposition 
           
          None on file









                                                                  SB 279
                                                                  Page  7

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Debbie Michel / L. GOV. / (916)  
          319-3958