BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        SB 298|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                 UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 298
          Author:   Wyland (R) and Walters (R)
          Amended:  9/6/13
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 4/30/13
          AYES:  Hancock, Anderson, Block, De Le�n, Knight, Liu, Steinberg

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 5/23/13
          AYES:  De Le�n, Walters, Gaines, Hill, Lara, Padilla, Steinberg

           SENATE FLOOR  :  37-0, 5/29/13
          AYES:  Anderson, Beall, Berryhill, Block, Calderon, Cannella,  
            Corbett, Correa, DeSaulnier, Emmerson, Evans, Fuller, Gaines,  
            Galgiani, Hancock, Hernandez, Hill, Hueso, Huff, Jackson,  
            Lara, Leno, Lieu, Liu, Monning, Nielsen, Padilla, Pavley,  
            Price, Roth, Steinberg, Torres, Walters, Wolk, Wright, Wyland,  
            Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  De Le�n, Knight, Vacancy

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  Not available


           SUBJECT  :    Local government:  supplemental law enforcement  
          services

           SOURCE  :     Orange County Board of Supervisors


           DIGEST  :    This bill allows Orange County or a city within  
          Orange County to contract for supplemental law enforcement  
          services to enforce the Vehicle Code (VEH) on a homeowners'  
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 298
                                                                     Page  
          2

          association's privately owned and maintained road.

           Assembly Amendments  add a coauthor and make clarifying and minor  
          technical corrections.

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law provides:

          1. The board of supervisors of any county may contract on behalf  
             of the sheriff of that county, and the legislative body of  
             any city may contract on behalf of the chief of police of  
             that city, to provide supplemental law enforcement services,  
             as specified.

          2. Any city or county may, by ordinance or resolution, find and  
             declare that there are privately owned and maintained roads  
             as described in the ordinance or resolution within the city  
             or county that are not generally held open for use of the  
             public for purposes of vehicular travel but, by reason of  
             their proximity to or connection with highways, the interests  
             of any residents residing along the roads and the motoring  
             public will best be served by application of the provisions,  
             as specified, to those roads.  No ordinance or resolution  
             shall be enacted unless it is first filed with the city or  
             county a petition requesting it by a majority of the owners  
             of any privately owned and maintained road, or by at least a  
             majority of the board of directors of a common interest  
             development, as defined, that is responsible for maintaining  
             the road, and without a public hearing thereon and 10 days'  
             prior written notice to all owners of the road or all of the  
             owners in the development.  Upon enactment of the ordinance  
             or resolution, the provisions of the VEH shall apply to the  
             privately owned and maintained road if appropriate signs are  
             erected at the entrance to the road of the size, shape, and  
             color as to be readily legible during daylight hours from a  
             distance of 100 feet, to the effect that the road is subject  
             to the provisions of this code.  The city or county may  
             impose reasonable conditions and may authorize the owners, or  
             board of directors of the common interest development, to  
             erect traffic signs, signals, markings, and devices which  
             conform to the uniform standards and specifications adopted  
             by the Department of Transportation.


                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 298
                                                                     Page  
          3

          3. The Department of Justice (DOJ) shall not be required to  
             provide patrol or enforce any provisions on any privately  
             owned and maintained road subjected to the provisions as  
             specified, except those provisions applicable to private  
             property other than by action.

          4. As used in VEH Section 21107.7, "privately owned and  
             maintained roads" includes roads owned and maintained by a  
             city, county, or district that are not dedicated to use by  
             the public or are not generally held open for use of the  
             public for purposes of vehicular travel. 

          This bill:

           1. Allows the Board of Supervisors of Orange County or the city  
             council of a city within Orange County, as part of a pilot  
             project, to contract to provide supplemental law enforcement  
             services to homeowners' associations, as defined in existing  
             law, on an occasional or ongoing basis to enforce the VEH on  
             a homeowners' association's privately owned and maintained  
             road, as specified. 

           2. Requires contracts entered into pursuant to this bill to  
             provide for full reimbursement to the county or city of the  
             actual costs of providing those services, as determined by  
             the county auditor or auditor-controller or the city auditor.  


           3. Requires the services provided pursuant to this bill to be  
             rendered by regularly appointed full-time peace officers, as  
             specified. 

           4. Allows services provided in connection with special events  
             or occurrences, as specified, to be rendered by Level I  
             reserve peace officers, as specified, who are authorized to  
             exercise the powers of a peace officer, as specified, if  
             regularly appointed full-time peace officers are not  
             available to fill the positions as required in the contract. 

           5. Requires peace officer rates of pay to be governed by a  
             memorandum of understanding. 

           6. Requires a contract entered into pursuant to this bill to  
             encompass only law enforcement duties and not services  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 298
                                                                     Page  
          4

             authorized to be provided by a private patrol operator, as  
             specified. 

           7. Prohibits contracting for law enforcement services, as  
             authorized by this bill, from reducing the normal and regular  
             ongoing service that the county or city or agency of the  
             county or city otherwise would provide. 

           8. Requires, prior to contracting for ongoing services under  
             this bill, the board of supervisors or city council to  
             discuss the contract and the requirements of this section at  
             a duly noticed public hearing. 

           9. Requires, on or before June 30, 2016, if the board of  
             supervisors or city council enters into the contract  
             authorized pursuant to this bill, the DOJ to prepare and  
             submit to the Legislature a report on the impact that a  
             contract entered into pursuant to this bill has on the  
             provision of law enforcement services to people in  
             communities within the county that are not served by  
             supplemental police services provided pursuant to this bill.   
             This report shall be submitted in compliance with existing  
             law governing reports to the Legislature.  If the board of  
             supervisors or city council enters into the contract, the  
             board of supervisors or city council, as appropriate, shall  
             reimburse DOJ for the costs of preparing and submitting the  
             report and may seek reimbursement from the homeowners'  
             association for these costs. 

           10.Provides that this bill shall remain in effect only until  
             January 1, 2017, and as of that date is repealed, unless a  
             later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1,  
             2017, deletes or extends that date. 

          Prior Legislation
           
          AB 1643 (Dickenson, Chapter 48, Statutes of 2012) authorized the  
          Sacramento County Sheriff or Sacramento Police Chief to provide  
          the services of sheriff's or police security officers, who are  
          not peace officers, to provide security services at properties  
          owned publicly or privately, whose primary business supports  
          national defense, or whose facility is qualified as a national  
          critical infrastructure under federal law or by a federal  
          agency, or that stores or manufactures material that, if stolen,  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 298
                                                                     Page  
          5

          vandalized, or otherwise compromised, may compromise national  
          security or pose a danger to residents within the County of  
          Sacramento.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No   Local:  
           No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, there will be  
          one-time costs potentially in excess of $150,000 (General Fund)  
          to the DOJ to prepare and submit the required report to the  
          Legislature.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  9/10/13)
           
          Orange County Board of Supervisors (source)
          California State Sheriffs' Association

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  9/10/13)

          Taxpayers for Improving Public Safety

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT :    According to the author:

            State law currently limits the options available to  
            homeowner's associations for law enforcement services.   
            Traditionally, unincorporated areas are patrolled by local law  
            enforcement for general law enforcement services, such as  
            responding to crimes or criminal complaints.  General law  
            enforcement services do not usually cover traffic enforcement,  
            leaving most homeowners' associations with no one to actively  
            patrol their roads for vehicle code infractions.

            SB 298 will provide statutory authority for a county or city  
            to enter into a contract with a homeowners' association that  
            owns and maintains their own private roads for the purpose of  
            providing vehicle code enforcement on an occasional or ongoing  
            basis. 

            Homeowner associations would be required to fully reimburse  
            the local government for all costs associated with the  
            additional services provided by law enforcement officials.   
            Additionally, current law requires that no contract entered  
            into can reduce the normal and regular public safety services  
            that the county or city should already provide.

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 298
                                                                     Page  
          6


           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    Taxpayers for Improving Public  
          Safety writes:

            Although the purpose may well be for the best interests of a  
            homeowners association, it comes at a cost to the general  
            public.  No private company or association should be able to  
            obtain a special benefit not available to the public at large.  
             By way of example, who else, except the special class created  
            by this legislation, may obtain vehicle code violation  
            enforcement for such violations as parking in a no parking or  
            limited parking zone in front of a private home or business by  
            paying the city to provide extra enforcement at a private  
            location.

            Although police services have suffered significant budget  
            cuts, they should not become "meter maids" for private  
            entities who have the money to pay for special services.   
            Individuals residing in gated and guarded communities in  
            Beverly Hills, La Jolla or Nob Hill should not have special  
            benefits because they can "buy police services."


          JG:k  9/10/13   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****

















                                                                CONTINUED