BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                            Senator Kevin de León, Chair


          SB 316 (Block) - School Safety: Door locks
          
          Amended: April 23, 2013         Policy Vote: Education 9-0
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: No
          Hearing Date: May 23, 2013      Consultant: Jacqueline  
          Wong-Hernandez
          
          SUSPENSE FILE. AS PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED.
          

          Bill Summary: SB 316 requires modernization projects submitted  
          to the Division of the State Architect (DSA) under the State  
          School Facility Program (SFP) to include locks that allow  
          classrooms and rooms with an occupancy of five persons or more  
          to be locked from the inside as a condition for receipt of state  
          bond funds beginning January 1, 2016, and requires, if federal  
          funds become available for purposes of school safety, that  
          school districts first consider using these funds to install  
          locks in every classroom and room with an occupancy of five  
          persons or more.

          Fiscal Impact (as approved on May 23, 2013): The requirements of  
          this bill are conditions for receipt of state bond funds for  
          modernization projects; the new bond funding a school receives  
          will pay the cost of this bill but puts pressure on the bond  
          funding by directing money toward a new requirement.
              Locks: Potentially significant costs to schools to purchase  
              specified locks for each classroom. Each lock costs  
              approximately $300.
              Mandate: The requirement that, if federal funds for school  
              safety become available, schools consider using the funds  
              for specified door locks is unlikely to drive new  
              reimbursable costs.

          Background: Existing law provides, as a condition of receipt of  
          state bond funds, that all new construction projects submitted  
          to the DSA include locks that allow classrooms and rooms with an  
          occupancy of five persons or more to be locked from the inside  
          and that these locks conform to Title 24 California Code of  
          Regulations specifications and requirements. Doors locked from  
          the outside at all times and pupil restrooms are exempt from  
          these requirements. (Education Code §17075.50)








          SB 316 (Block)
          Page 1



          Proposed Law: SB 316 requires that all modernization projects  
          submitted to the DSA under the SFP include locks that allow  
          classrooms and rooms with an occupancy of five persons or more  
          to be locked from the inside as a condition for receipt of state  
          education bond funds beginning January 1, 2016. This bill also  
          requires, if federal funding becomes available for purposes of  
          school safety, that school districts first consider using these  
          funds to install locks that allow every classroom and room with  
          an occupancy of five persons or more to be locked from the  
          inside. 
          

          Staff Comments: This bill requires interior door locks on  
          modernization projects submitted for funding under the SFP  
          beginning in 2016, which suggests that these projects, like new  
          construction projects, would be eligible for state bond funds to  
          assist in meeting the costs of compliance. This bill does not  
          specifically provide that bond funding can be used for  
          installation of interior locks; if schools use part of their  
          base modernization grant to fund these requirements, less money  
          would be left for projects that may be a higher priority for the  
          school.

          According to the DSA, to the extent the addition of a new lock  
          requires "alteration," a variety of Americans with Disabilities  
          Act (ADA) compliance requirements could be triggered. These  
          could vary from simply requiring more extensive alteration to a  
          doorframe, to more extensive construction activity such as  
          walkway and bathroom modifications, resulting in much more  
          significant project costs. This would create significant  
          additional cost pressure on a school's modernization funding.
                
           With regard to the mandate identified by legislative counsel,  
          this bill would merely require that districts first "consider"  
          safety locks if federal funding is provided. It is unclear how  
          this would be enforced, and schools are not likely to be able to  
          quantify resources and workload resulting from that  
          consideration; this provision is unlikely to be reimbursable.


          AS PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED: Amend per author to require the State  
          Allocation Board to adopt regulations to adjust the  
          modernization pre-pupil grant allowance to include the  








          SB 316 (Block)
          Page 2


          associated cost to install the required locks.

          The committee amendments would make the provisions of this bill  
          apply to bond funding approved in the future.