BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        SB 355|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                    THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 355
          Author:   Beall (D)
          Amended:  5/13/13
          Vote:     21 - Urgency


           SENATE NATURAL RESOURCES AND WATER COMMITTEE  :  8-1, 4/23/13
          AYES:  Pavley, Cannella, Evans, Hueso, Jackson, Lara, Monning,  
            Wolk
          NOES:  Fuller

           SENATE GOVERNANCE & FINANCE COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 5/1/13
          AYES:  Wolk, Knight, Beall, DeSaulnier, Emmerson, Hernandez, Liu

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  6-0, 1/23/14
          AYES:  De León, Gaines, Hill, Lara, Padilla, Steinberg
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Walters


           SUBJECT  :    Conservation:  tax credits

           SOURCE  :     California Council of Land Trusts


           DIGEST  :    This bill allows for the transfer of the credit  
          allowed, pursuant to the Natural Heritage Preservation Tax  
          Credit Act of 2000 (Act) from prior years whose carry over  
          period has not expired by the taxpayer to an unrelated party, as  
          provided.

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law:
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 355
                                                                     Page  
          2


           1. Requires, under the Act, the Wildlife Conservation Board  
             (Board) to implement a program under which property, as  
             defined, may be contributed to the state, any local  
             government, as defined, or to any nonprofit organization  
             designated by a local government, based on specified  
             criteria, in order to provide for the protection of wildlife  
             habitat, open space, and agricultural lands.

           2. Allows, under the Personal Income Tax Law and the  
             Corporation Tax Law, a credit against the taxes imposed by  
             those laws in the amount equal to 55% of the fair market  
             value of any qualified contribution, as defined, contributed  
             during the taxable year pursuant to the Act, as provided.

          This bill:

           1. Allows for the transfer of the credit allowed pursuant to  
             the Act from prior years whose carry over period has not  
             expired by the taxpayer to an unrelated party, as provided.

           2. Requires the taxpayer to report to the Board prior to the  
             transfer of the credit, in the form and manner specified by  
             the Board, all required information regarding the transfer of  
             the credit, including the social security or other taxpayer  
             identification number of the unrelated party to whom the  
             credit has been transferred and the face amount of the credit  
             transferred, for the approval of the Board.

           3. Requires the Board, upon approval of the transfer, to  
             provide a certificate to the taxpayer evidencing the  
             approval, in the form and manner specified by the Franchise  
             Tax Board (FTB), that shall include all required information  
             regarding the credit.

           4. Prohibits the Board from approving a transfer of a credit if  
             the consideration received by the taxpayer in exchange for  
             the credit is less than 90% of the value of the credit to be  
             transferred.

           Background 
           
          The Board is a separate and independent board within the  
          Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW) with authority and funding  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 355
                                                                     Page  
          3

          to carry out an acquisition and development program for wildlife  
          conservation.  The Board consists of the President of the Fish  
          and Game Commission, the Director of the DFW and the Director of  
          the Department of Finance.

          The Board's main functions are land protection, habitat  
          restoration, and development of wildlife-oriented public access  
          facilities.  To those ends, the Board approves and funds land  
          acquisitions, conservation easement acquisitions, and habitat  
          restoration, enhancement, and public access projects.  

          The Act was intended to foster public/private partnerships to  
          resolve land use and water disputes, assist habitat stewardship,  
          and demonstrate the state's commitment to protect natural  
          resources by rewarding landowners who perceive habitat as an  
          asset rather than a liability.  Consequently, the Act provided  
          up to $100 million in state tax credits for donations of water  
          rights or qualified land (fee title or easement) equal to 55% of  
          the appraised market value.  The donation had to protect  
          wildlife habitat, parks and open space, archaeological  
          resources, agricultural land, or water.  The donation could have  
          been to any department within the Agency, a local government, or  
          a qualified non-profit.  Credit was limited to landowners "net  
          tax" liability.  However, the credit could be carried over up to  
          eight years until the credit was exhausted.  The tax credit  
          program was run through the Board.

          The tax credit program was first implemented in 2001 but was  
          suspended in 2002 because of pressures on the General Fund (GF).  
           In 2005, an amended version of the program was reinstated  
          through June 30, 2008.  Under the amended program, a donation  
          was only eligible for a tax credit if all the lost revenue  
          resulting from the tax credit could have been reimbursed to the  
          GF from another source, such as state bond funds including  
          Proposition 40 and Proposition 50.

          The tax credit was continued in 2009, by, among other things,  
          extending the sunset date from June 30, 2008 to June 30, 2015,  
          removing the $100 million cap on the amount of tax credits that  
          can be approved by the Board, and allowing certain fund sources  
          other than bond funds to reimburse the GF for the revenue loss  
          resulting from the award of tax credits.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 355
                                                                     Page  
          4

          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, FTB estimates  
          that this bill will result in revenue losses of $700,000 in  
          2013-14, $3.4 million in 2014-15, and $4.5 million in 2015-16.   
          Existing law requires reimbursement from the National Heritage  
          Preservation Tax Credit Reimbursement Account; consequently, the  
          net current cost to the GF would be zero.  To the extent that  
          these reimbursements come from bond fund expenditures or private  
          donations, there will be future GF impacts related to (1)  
          increased future debt-service costs, and (2) reduced future  
          revenues from increased deductions.

          The FTB indicates that this bill will not significantly impact  
          its own costs.  Costs to the Board are unknown, but likely  
          minor.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  1/23/14)

          California Council of Land Trusts (source)
          California Rangeland Trust
          Land Trust of Santa Cruz County
          Marin Agricultural Land Trust
          Peninsula Open Space Trust
          Sequoia Riverlands Trust
          Trust for Public Land
          Wildlife Heritage Foundation

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to this bill's sponsor,  
          California Council of Land Trusts, "The Natural Heritage  
          Preservation Tax Credit (NHPTC) has protected 8,006 acres with  
          the authorization of $48.5 M in tax credits for a total of 14  
          projects; and, it has delivered high value for the state's  
          dollar.  While this success cannot be overlooked or minimized,  
          not a single eligible entity had taken advantage of the NHPTC  
          since 2005.  Prior to 2005, many landowners were interested but  
          were unable to make it work for them.  The primary reason is  
          that most landowners are simply unable to take advantage of the  
          state tax credit because they lack the state tax liability that  
          would make the tax credit under NHPTC attractive to them.  In  
          contrast, California business entities frequently have state tax  
          liabilities.  In recognition of this mismatch between the  
          realities of landownership and state tax liabilities, SB 355  
          proposes to modify the existing NHPTC so that landowners who are  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 355
                                                                     Page  
          5

          unable to utilize the tax credit can transfer the tax credit to  
          interested corporate entities who can utilize the tax credit."


          RM:k  1/24/14   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****




































                                                                CONTINUED