BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 377| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- UNFINISHED BUSINESS Bill No: SB 377 Author: Lieu (D) Amended: 9/3/13 Vote: 21 SENATE LABOR & INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE : 3-1, 4/24/13 AYES: Lieu, Leno, Yee NOES: Wyland NO VOTE RECORDED: Padilla SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : 5-2, 5/23/13 AYES: De León, Hill, Lara, Padilla, Steinberg NOES: Walters, Gaines SENATE FLOOR : 28-10, 5/28/13 AYES: Beall, Block, Calderon, Cannella, Corbett, Correa, De León, DeSaulnier, Evans, Galgiani, Hancock, Hernandez, Hill, Hueso, Jackson, Lara, Leno, Lieu, Liu, Monning, Padilla, Pavley, Price, Roth, Steinberg, Torres, Wright, Yee NOES: Anderson, Berryhill, Emmerson, Fuller, Gaines, Huff, Knight, Nielsen, Walters, Wyland NO VOTE RECORDED: Wolk, Vacancy ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 53-25, 9/9/13 - See last page for vote SUBJECT : Public works: project determinations: wage and penalty assessments SOURCE : International Union of Operating Engineers CONTINUED SB 377 Page 2 DIGEST : This bill requires the Director (Director) of the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) to establish a new process to determine whether a project is a public work, upon the request of any party, as specified. Assembly Amendments (1) delete a notice provision related to a political subdivision that believes that a project in which it is interested, is not a public work, (2) make changes to the director's project determination timelines, and make specified determinations exempt from the Administrative Procedure Act, (3) require the person filing a notice of completion to also provide notice to the Labor Commissioner, as specified, and require the awarding body or political subdivision accepting a public work to provide to the Labor Commissioner notice of that acceptance, as specified, and (4) toll the period for service of assessments and for commencing an action brought by a joint labor-management committee for the length of time notice is not provided to the Labor Commissioner. ANALYSIS : Existing law defines "public works" to include, among other jobs, construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work done under contract and paid for in whole or in part out of public funds. Under existing law, "paid for in whole or in part out of public funds" means, among other things, the following: 1. The payment of money or the equivalent of money by the state or political subdivision directly to or on behalf of the public works contractor, subcontractor, or developer. 2. The performance of construction work by the state or political subdivision in execution of the project. 3. Fees, costs, rents, insurance or bond premiums, loans, interest rates, or other obligations that would normally be required in the execution of the contract, that are paid, reduced, charged at less than fair market value, waived, or forgiven by the state or political subdivision. 4. Money loaned by the state or political subdivision that is to be repaid on a contingent basis. CONTINUED SB 377 Page 3 Existing law: 1.Defines "awarding body" or "body awarding the contract" as the department, board, authority, officer or agent awarding a contract for public work. 2.Requires all employees who work on public works projects costing $1,000 or more to be paid the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general prevailing rate for holiday and overtime work for the specific location where the public work is to be performed. This requirement is applicable to work performed under contract and it does not apply to work carried out by a public agency with its own forces. 3.Provides certain exemptions to the payment of prevailing wage that includes, among others, private residential projects. The Director is tasked with the responsibility of determining the general prevailing rate of per diem wages in accordance with specified standards. 4.Requires the Labor Commissioner to issue a civil wage and penalty assessment to a contractor or subcontractor, or both, if, after an investigation, the commissioner determines there has been a violation of the laws regulating public works projects, including the payment of prevailing wages. The assessment is required to be served within 180 days after the filing of a valid notice of completion in the county where the public work was performed or within 180 days after the acceptance of the public work, except as specified. 5.Authorizes a joint labor-management committee, established pursuant to a specified provision of federal law, to bring an action against any employer who fails to pay prevailing wages as required by state law. 6.Requires each contractor and subcontractor to keep accurate payroll records, as prescribed, that are certified and available for inspection, as specified. This bill: 1. Provides that the period of service for assessments for prevailing wage violations shall be tolled for the period of time required by DIR to determine whether a project is a CONTINUED SB 377 Page 4 public work. 2. Provides that the period of service for assessments shall also be tolled for the period of time that a contractor or subcontractor fails to provide certified payroll records in a timely manner, as specified. 3. Provides that these tolling provisions shall also apply to the period of time for commencing an action brought by a joint labor-management committee. 4. Provides that when a request is made to DIR for a determination of whether a specific project or type of work is a public work, DIR shall make that determination within 60 days of receipt of the last notice of support or opposition from any interested party. 5. Specifies that if DIR deems that the complexity of the request requires additional time, DIR may have up to an additional 60 days, as specified. 6. Provides that for projects or types of work that are otherwise private development projects receiving public funds as specified, DIR shall make the determination within 120 days of receipt of the last notice of support or opposition from any interested party. 7. Provides that if the requestor of a determination is not a political subdivision, the requester shall, within 15 days, serve a copy of the request upon the political subdivision. In such a case the awarding body shall advise DIR of its position regarding the request within 30 days of receipt of the request. 8. Provides for an administrative appeal process, as specified. 9. Provides that DIR shall have quasi-legislative authority to determine coverage of projects or other types of work under existing prevailing wage laws and a final determination on any appeal is subject to judicial review, as specified. 10.Provides that these determinations, and any determinations relating to the general prevailing wage rate, as specified, CONTINUED SB 377 Page 5 will be exempt from the Administrative Procedure Act. 11.Makes related findings and declarations. Comments A brief history of state and federal prevailing wage law . State prevailing wage laws vary from state to state, but do share a common history that predates federal prevailing wage law. Many of these state laws were enacted as part of Progressive Era reform efforts to improve working conditions at the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th centuries. Between 1891 and 1923, seven states adopted prevailing wage laws that required payment of specified hourly wages on government construction projects, the State of Kansas being the first in 1891. 18 additional states (including California in 1931) and the federal government adopted prevailing wage laws during the Great Depression of the 1930s amidst concern that acceptance of the low bid, a common requirement of government contracting for public projects, would reduce local wages and disrupt the local economies. This was particularly in the depths of the Great Depression, where, for some local economies, the government had become the primary purchaser of construction products and a significant employer. In general, the proponents of prevailing wage legislation wanted to prevent the government from using its purchasing power to undermine the wages of its citizens. It was believed that the government should set an example, by paying the wages prevailing in a locality for each occupation hired by government contractors to build public projects. Even today, prevailing wage laws are generally meant to ensure that wages commonly paid to construction workers in a particular region will determine the minimum wage paid to the same type of workers employed on publicly funded construction projects. Prior legislation . SB 966 (Alarcon, Chapter 804, Statutes of 2003) permitted a contractor to recover increased costs from an awarding body of public works, if the work had been determined to be subject to prevailing wages after the job had begun. FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No CONTINUED SB 377 Page 6 According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, DIR estimates that it would incur staffing costs of $580,000 (special funds) for additional staff and related equipment expenses to implement the provisions of this bill, for (1) developing forms, (2) adopting regulations, (3) monitoring reports by awarding bodies about projects not believed to be subject to the requirements of the California prevailing wage law, and (4) making coverage determinations and decisions on appeal within the time prescribed by this bill. Additionally, this bill will result in database costs to DIR to capture the interested political subdivision, the parties and any person that has asked for that notice the reason and all the pertinent dates and timeframes pursuant to the decision process for the determinations. The estimated cost for this on-line notification system is $230,000 in the first year of implementation plus $50,000 ongoing for operation and maintenance. SUPPORT : (per Assembly Labor and Employment Committee analysis of 8/14/13 - unable to reverify at time of writing) International Union of Operating Engineers (source) California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO Construction Employer's Association State Building & Construction Trades Council of California OPPOSITION : (per Assembly Labor and Employment Committee analysis of 8/14/13 - unable to reverify at time of writing) Associated Builders and Contractors of California California Special Districts Association Department of Finance ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : Proponents argue that existing law lacks a sufficient notification requirement for public works projects to inform the public about whether a project is determined to be a public works. They contend that this allows an awarding body to put out a project for bid without a determination - resulting in the contractor to pay below the prevailing wage, depriving workers of their lawful wages. Proponents argue that this bill's notification requirement will ensure that the contractor with a winning bid of a public works project will pay the lawfully mandated prevailing wage. CONTINUED SB 377 Page 7 Proponents further argue that existing law fails to provide a set deadline for the Commissioner to serve a civil wage and penalty assessment to determine a violation. They maintain that this lack of a streamlined appellate process causes workers to have to suffer through a long waiting period before learning if there was in fact a wage violation. Proponents contend when a decision is finally granted, the long wait time often leaves workers without any options because the statute of limitations for legal action has run out - eliminating the worker's opportunity to collected the owed wages. ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION : According to the Associated Builders and Contractors of California, this bill sets out a revised process where a public entity has a new duty to self-report public works projects they deem to not be a works. This bill also extends the date that the Commissioner can assess non-payment of prevailing wage penalties. Opponents believe this bill unreasonably extends contractor exposure to legal challenges and liability for new fines and penalties because the date actions can commence is based on when the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement makes a determination of whether or not a project is a public works. The construction industry is just beginning to recover. California also has some of the most stringent labor laws and penalties for violating those requirements. Opponents do not see a reason to increase contractor liability at this time. ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 53-25, 9/9/13 AYES: Alejo, Ammiano, Atkins, Bloom, Bocanegra, Bonilla, Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian Calderon, Campos, Chau, Chesbro, Cooley, Daly, Dickinson, Eggman, Fong, Fox, Frazier, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Hall, Roger Hernández, Holden, Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Lowenthal, Medina, Mitchell, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Nazarian, Pan, Perea, V. Manuel Pérez, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon, Salas, Skinner, Stone, Ting, Weber, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, John A. Pérez NOES: Achadjian, Allen, Bigelow, Chávez, Conway, Dahle, Donnelly, Beth Gaines, Gorell, Grove, Hagman, Harkey, Jones, Linder, Logue, Maienschein, Mansoor, Melendez, Morrell, Nestande, Olsen, Patterson, Wagner, Waldron, Wilk NO VOTE RECORDED: Vacancy, Vacancy CONTINUED SB 377 Page 8 PQ:AL:nl:k 9/9/13 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END **** CONTINUED