BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó






                                                       Bill No:  SB  
          398
          
                 SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION
                       Senator Roderick D. Wright, Chair
                           2013-2014 Regular Session
                                 Staff Analysis



          SB 398  Author:  Galgiani
          As Amended:  April 1, 2013
          Hearing Date:  April 9, 2013
          Consultant:  Art Terzakis


                                     SUBJECT  
              Horse Racing: charity days: distribution of proceeds

                                   DESCRIPTION
           
          SB 398 provides that revenue raised by racing associations,  
          from their mandated charity racing days, may be distributed  
          to a nonprofit corporation or trust that has as its sole  
          purpose the support of recognized fairs within the network  
          of California fairs.

                                   EXISTING LAW

           Article IV, Section 19(b) of the Constitution of the State  
          of California provides that the Legislature may provide for  
          the regulation of horse races and horse race meetings and  
          wagering on the results. 

          Existing law grants the California Horse Racing Board  
          (CHRB) the authority to regulate the various forms of horse  
          racing authorized in this state.  

          Existing law provides that each licensed racing association  
          shall designate three to five racing days during any one  
          meeting (depending on the length of the meeting), as  
          charity days by the licensee for the purpose of  
          distribution of the net proceeds to charitable  
          beneficiaries. 

          Existing law provides that at least 20% of the distribution  




          SB 398 (Galgiani) continued                              
          Page 2
          


          from charity day racing must be made to charities  
          associated with the horse racing industry.  In addition to  
          this 20%, another 5% of the distribution must go to a  
          welfare fund established for the benefit of horsemen,  
          horsewomen and backstretch personnel, as specified, and  
          another 5% of the distribution must be provided to a  
          nonprofit corporation assisting horsemen, horsewomen and  
          backstretch personnel who are affected adversely as a  
          result of alcohol or substance abuse.  

          Existing law also requires that an additional 20% of the  
          distribution from charity day racing, up to a maximum of $2  
          million, be provided as an endowment for a nonprofit  
          corporation or trust which assists disabled jockeys.
                                    BACKGROUND
           
           Purpose of SB 398:   The author's office points out that for  
          more than 75 years, horse racing license fees was the  
          primary source of funding for fairs.  In 2009, as part of  
          the State Budget negotiations, SBxx 16 (Ashburn) shifted  
          the responsibility for funding fairs from horse racing  
          license fees to the state General Fund.  Elimination of the  
          license fees was intended to help the racing industry and  
          provide a dedicated revenue stream from the General Fund  
          ($32 million) to the network of fairs.  In 2011, the  
          General Fund support for fairs was eliminated as part of a  
          package of cuts designed to help deal with the state's  
          ongoing fiscal crisis.  According to the author's office,  
          this measure is intended to give the horse racing industry  
          the ability to, once again, contribute to the well-being of  
          California's fairs.   

          Staff Comments:   The State's fair circuit generally  
          consists of the following fairs conducting approximately  
          90+ days of racing: San Joaquin County (Stockton), Alameda  
          County (Pleasanton), Solano County (Vallejo), Sonoma County  
          (Santa Rosa), San Mateo County (San Mateo), Humboldt County  
          (Ferndale), Fresno County (Fresno), and the Los Angeles  
          County Fair (Pomona).  In addition to mixed-breed meets at  
          Cal-Expo (Sacramento), a harness (Standard-bred) racing  
          meet is conducted at various times of the year at the  
          Cal-Expo facility.  Following the demolition of Bay Meadows  
          in 2008, which was adjacent to the San Mateo County  
          Fairgrounds and used by the fair to run its live horse  
          racing meet, San Mateo's dates have been run at Golden Gate  
          Fields in Albany. Solano's dates have been split between  




          SB 398 (Galgiani) continued                              
          Page 3
          


          Alameda County and Sonoma County for which Solano receives  
          compensation. 

          Since the early 1940's, California racing associations have  
          been required to conduct charity racing days. By law, each  
          racing association must conduct a specified portion of its  
          race meeting for the benefit of charities meeting the  
          statutory criteria and approval of the CHRB.  The law also  
          requires that at least 50% of the proceeds be distributed  
          to charitable groups within the horse racing industry.  On  
          charity racing days, the racing association furnishes the  
          facilities and personnel necessary for the conduct of  
          racing.  The income from all operations of the race meeting  
          on charitable racings days, less deductions for actual  
          expenses, is dedicated to charitable purposes.  According  
          to the CHRB, charity racing day donations in the 2011-12  
          fiscal year totaled just over $577,000.00.

          Prior to the passage and enactment of SB 16xx (Ashburn) of  
          2009, license fees assessed from the wagers made on horse  
          racing were deposited to the credit of the F&E Fund which,  
          in addition to providing general support for the annual  
          budget of the CHRB, supplemented the income of the State's  
          network of fairs.  At that time, the law guaranteed the  
          Fair and Exposition (F&E) Fund would receive $40 million  
          annually from license fees.  SB 16xx eliminated the license  
          fee on wagers as a means of helping the struggling horse  
          racing industry.  In addition, it deleted the $40 million  
          "guarantee" from law.  This amount is, instead, distributed  
          to the racing associations and horsemen and horsewomen.   
          The bill also provided that the state funding for the  
          network of California fairs shall be a continuous  
          appropriation of $32 million annually from the General  
          Fund.  

          The $32 million General Fund support for the network of  
          California fairs was eliminated in the 2011-2012 Budget due  
          to the state's growing fiscal problems.  
                                         
                           PRIOR/RELATED LEGISLATION
           
           SB 741 (Cannella) 2013-14 Session.   Among other things,  
          would delete provisions requiring satellite wagering  
          license fees be deposited into a separate account in the  
          F&E Fund for specified purposes and would instead require  
          certain revenues paid by racing associations and fairs  




          SB 398 (Galgiani) continued                              
          Page 4
          


          generated by parimutuel wagering and certain revenues from  
          live races paid by fair racing associations as license fees  
          be deposited into the F&E Fund for various purposes,  
          including, among others, capital improvements at  
          fairgrounds.  (Pending in Senate Agriculture Committee;  
          dual referred to Senate G.O.)
           
          SB 1418 (Berryhill), Chapter 225, Statutes of 2012.    
          Authorized combined fair horse racing meetings throughout  
          the year and deleted the requirement that the mixed breed  
          meetings be conducted by an entity other than Cal-Expo, as  
          specified, and that the mixed breed meetings encourage the  
          racing of emerging breeds of horses.
           
          SB 1227 (Negrete McLeod) 2011-12 Session.   Would have  
          deleted an existing requirement that 1% of the total amount  
          handled in daily conventional and exotic parimutuel pools  
          be distributed to the F&E Fund, and instead would have  
          required that those funds be equally distributed as  
          commissions and to the horsemen and horsewomen who  
          participated in the racing meet (as purses).  (Held in  
          Assembly Appropriations Committee - suspense file)
          
           SB 16xx (Ashburn), Chapter 12, Statutes of 2009-10 Second  
          Extraordinary Session  .  Among other things, eliminated the  
          $40 million floor on the amount the horse racing industry  
          is required to pay annually for support of the network of  
          California fairs, the CHRB, and the Kenneth L. Maddy Equine  
          Analytical Chemistry Laboratory at UC Davis.  Other than  
          the supplemental 1% assessed against fair meets, it also  
          eliminated the license fee on horse racing wagers and  
          provided that beginning on July 1, 2009, and annually  
          thereafter, $32 million shall be appropriated from the  
          state's General Fund and paid into the F&E Fund for the  
          financial support of the State's network of fairs.  

           SB 1337 (Vincent), Chapter 904, Statutes of 2002.   Provided  
          that, in addition to the 20% of the distribution from  
          charity day racing that is required to go to charities  
          associated with the horse racing industry, another 5% of  
          the distribution shall be provided to a welfare fund  
          established for the benefit of horsemen and backstretch  
          personnel, as specified, and another 5% of the distribution  
          shall be provided to a nonprofit corporation assisting  
          horsemen and backstretch personnel who are affected  
          adversely as a result of alcohol or substance abuse.  Also,  




          SB 398 (Galgiani) continued                              
          Page 5
          


          required that an additional 20% of the distribution from  
          charity day racing, up to a maximum of $2 million, be  
          provided as an endowment for a nonprofit corporation or  
          trust which assists disabled jockeys.  

          SB 1825 (Kelley) Chapter 342, Statutes of 2000.  Provided  
          that, notwithstanding any other provision of law, if the  
          total amount paid to the state by racing associations and  
          fairs pursuant to the Horse Racing Law is less than $40  
          million in any calendar year, beginning January 1, 2001,  
          and thereafter, all associations and fairs that conducted  
          live racing during the year of shortfall shall remit to the  
          state, on a pro rata basis according to the amount handled  
          in-state by each association or fair, the amount necessary  
          to bring the total amount paid to the state to $40 million.  
            
            SB 27 (Maddy), Chapter 335, Statutes of 1998.  Among other  
          things, granted major license fee relief ($40 million  
          annually) and limited out-of-state full-card simulcasting.   
           
            
          Proposition 3 of 1933.   Legalized parimutuel wagering on  
          horse racing in California. With the passage of Proposition  
          3, the stated purpose of the new law was for the  
          "encouragement of agriculture and breeding of horses."   
          Furthermore, Proposition 3 included a "commitment for the  
          continuous funding of the fairs of California with an  
          annual allotment of racing revenues to be used for health,  
          safety and maintenance projects."  

           SUPPORT:   As of April 5, 2013:

          California Authority of Racing Fairs (sponsor)

           OPPOSE:   None on file as of April 5, 2013.

           FISCAL COMMITTEE:   Senate Appropriations Committee

                                   **********











          SB 398 (Galgiani) continued                              
          Page 6