BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 406 Page 1 Date of Hearing: July 2, 2014 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Mike Gatto, Chair SB 406 (Evans) - As Amended: June 18, 2014 Policy Committee: JudiciaryVote:10-0 Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: Yes Reimbursable: No SUMMARY This bill: 1)Exempts tribal court judgments, until January 1, 2018, from the Uniform Foreign Country Monetary Judgments Recognition Act (UFCMJRA), and instead enacts similar but streamlined procedures under the Tribal Court Civil Money Judgment Act (TCCMJA). 2)Requires the California Law Revision Commission (CLRC) to study the standards for recognition of a tribal court or foreign court judgment under the TCCMJA and the UFCMJRA and to report to the Legislature and the Governor by January 1, 2017 its findings and any recommendations for improvement of those standards. FISCAL EFFECT 1)Likely minor savings in court costs from streamlined procedures for enforcing tribal court judgments. 2)Absorbable one-time cost to the CLRC for the study and report, which will likely require the commission to reprioritize its work on other topics that the Legislature has directed the commission to study. COMMENTS 1)Purpose . According to the author, "Under existing law, a party seeking enforcement of a civil tribal court money judgment in a state superior court currently must do so under the Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act (UFCMJRA). SB 406 Page 2 The UFCMJRA process can be costly and time-consuming for both the parties and the court, in some cases even causing parties to unnecessarily re-litigate what the tribal court has already decided. "This bill proposes to establish the Tribal Court Civil Money Judgment Act, a new legal framework for seeking enforcement of tribal court money judgments under procedures that are modeled upon the simpler procedures applicable to judgments from the courts of other states, while still applying the principles of comity currently required for judgments from sovereign nations. The framework would not alter the legal standards that state courts apply in recognizing and enforcing tribal court money judgments, but merely clarify and consolidate the procedures for doing so into a uniform and streamlined statutory scheme." This bill is co-sponsored by the Judicial Council and Blue Lake Rancheria. 2)Concerns have been expressed that the bill questions tribal sovereignty and the legitimacy of tribal courts. Conversely, several opponents believe the bill fails to require sufficient due process of law in the underlying tribal court proceedings before the resulting judgments can be enforced in California courts. In response, the Assembly Judiciary Committee amendments establish a three-year sunset on the TCCMJA and require the CLRC, in the meantime, to assess the standards for recognition of tribal court judgments. Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081