BILL ANALYSIS Ó Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary Senator Kevin de León, Chair SB 416 (Liu) - State route 710 corridor: surplus properties. Amended: May 1, 2013 Policy Vote: T&H 11-0 Urgency: No Mandate: No Hearing Date: May 23, 2013 Consultant: Mark McKenzie SUSPENSE FILE. AS PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED. Bill Summary: SB 416 would make a number of changes to the Roberti Act, which governs the sale of surplus property in the SR 710 corridor, including authorization for Caltrans to sell properties in an "as-is" condition to specified income-qualified persons. The bill would also require the proceeds from the sale of those properties to be deposited into a newly created continuously appropriated fund, rather than the State Highway Account, for purposes of providing repairs to remaining properties until the last property is sold. The amounts not needed for home repairs would be deposited into the State Highway Account. Fiscal Impact (as approved on May 23, 2013): Diversion of approximately $500,000 to $1 million annually in SR 710 home sales proceeds from the State Highway Account to the SR 710 Rehabilitation Account, likely beginning in 2014-15 and ending when all surplus residential properties in the corridor are sold. The total magnitude of the diversion depends upon how much is needed annually for home repairs. Staff assumes that approximately $500,000 annually could be dedicated for repairs. The remainder would be deposited in the State Highway Account on an annual basis. Indeterminable fiscal impact related to the authorization to sell properties to income-qualified persons in an "as-is" condition. Caltrans indicates that each home sold "as-is" would result in up-front cost avoidance of approximately $68,000 related to avoided repairs, but also result in a lower property value and sale price. Since the number of homes that will be sold in an "as-is" condition and the resulting decrease in property value at the time of sale is unknown, the overall fiscal impact is indeterminable. SB 416 (Liu) Page 1 Background: Under existing law, whenever Caltrans determines that real property acquired for highway purposes is no longer necessary, that property may be sold or exchanged upon terms, standards, and conditions established by the California Transportation Commission (CTC). Proceeds from the sale are returned to the State Highway Account. If a proposed state highway route location is rescinded, existing law requires Caltrans to sell any excess real property acquired for the rescinded route location and use the proceeds to fund the state highway project that is proposed as the alternative to the rescinded route. For decades Caltrans has proposed the SR 710 extension project to close a roughly 4.5-mile unconstructed gap in the freeway from just north of SR 10 in Los Angeles to SR 210 in Pasadena. Beginning in 1953, when the location of the SR 710 Gap Closure Project was originally identified, Caltrans acquired nearly 600 properties in the corridor with the intent to eventually remove structures and construct the freeway project. The proposed project has engendered considerable and ongoing controversy over the years, evoking both strong support and opposition from various parties, and has been the subject of numerous lawsuits. Caltrans has been an unwilling long-term property manager for years, which was the subject a Bureau of State Audits report last year that criticized Caltrans' management of over 400 rental properties. Over the past forty years, alternative concepts have been proposed and evaluated to complete the SR 710 freeway and close the 4.5 mile gap in the corridor. To date, none of the previously proposed alternatives have been successful in satisfying the regional mobility needs and community/environmental concerns because they would traverse highly developed urbanized neighborhoods and require substantial amounts of right-of-way along the alignments. In response to negative reactions, and to decrease the potential impact of completing the SR 710, a tunnel concept was proposed for assessment as an option to the surface alternatives. The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) has completed the feasibility assessment of a tunnel alternative to extend the SR 710 from its current terminus in the City of Los Angeles to Interstate 210 in Pasadena. Generally, the study concluded that the tunnel concept is feasible. MTA is currently in the midst of an environmental review of the SR 710 study SB 416 (Liu) Page 2 area. Caltrans projects that completion of the draft environmental impact report and selection of a locally preferred alternative to the surface gap closure project is at least a year away. Consideration of the surface construction alternative has not been eliminated to date, but it is not likely to be considered among the final options. Existing law, the Roberti Act, establishes priorities and procedures for the disposition of surplus residential properties in the SR 710 corridor. Under the act, Caltrans must offer surplus single-family residences in the following priority order: First, at the appraised fair market value to a former owner who currently occupies the residence. Second, at an affordable price to a current low- or moderate-income occupant who has occupied the property for at least two years. Third, at an affordable price to a current occupant with household income of up to 150% of the area median income who has occupied the property for at least five years. Fourth, to housing-related public and private entities that provide affordable housing at a price necessary to make the housing affordable to present tenants and households of low or moderate income. Lastly, at fair market value to occupants and then to persons who intend to be owner-occupants. With respect to properties offered to income-qualified buyers, as noted in the second and third priorities above, Caltrans must provide repairs required by lenders and government housing assistance programs prior to the sale or provide the occupants with a replacement dwelling. Proposed Law: SB 416 would make a number of changes to the Roberti Act governing the sale of surplus properties in the SR 710 corridor. Specifically, this bill would: Require the assessment of "fair market value" to reflect the existing "as-is" condition of the property, taking into account any repairs required to make the property safe and habitable. Authorize Caltrans to offer a residence in an "as-is" condition at the request of an income-qualified person. Current law requires residences sold to these persons to be repaired prior to sale. For residences sold at fair market value, give priority to SB 416 (Liu) Page 3 tenants in good standing with rent obligations, rather than any present occupant, then to former tenants who were in good standing when they vacated the residence, before the home is offered to persons who intend to be owner-occupants. Adds a provision for non-residential properties, providing tenants in good standing a right of first refusal to purchase a property at fair market value that they rent, lease or otherwise legally occupy. Require Caltrans to deposit proceeds from sales of SR 710 properties into the SR 710 Rehabilitation Account, a continuously appropriated fund created by the bill. Proceeds deposited into the fund would be used to make repairs required by the Roberti Act to homes being purchased by income-qualified residents. Require Caltrans to transfer any funds remaining in the account to the State Highway Account after the last of the properties is repaired. Related Legislation: SB 204 (Liu), which was vetoed by Governor Brown last year, would have required CTC and Caltrans to declare properties in the SR 710 corridor as excess property, and require Caltrans to sell those properties, as specified. Proceeds from the sale would be used for specified local transportation projects in the SR 710 corridor. The Governor's veto message indicated that SB 204 was premature because Caltrans was in the midst of a review of options for managing the SR 710 properties, and because the environmental review being conducted by MTA has not been completed. The veto message also conveyed a commitment to the author to work together on a solution over the property management issues and long-standing controversy over closing the SR 710 freeway gap. Staff Comments: The fiscal impact of the bill's requirement that an assessment of "fair market value" reflect the existing "as-is" condition of the property, taking into account any repairs required to make the property safe and habitable is unknown. Staff assumes that an appraisal of a given property would reflect the actual value of the home, whether or not it needs repairs. Under the Roberti Act, Caltrans is required to make repairs to a home prior to sale to specified income-qualified purchasers. SB 416 would authorize Caltrans to offer a property in an "as-is" condition at the request of a purchaser that meets specified SB 416 (Liu) Page 4 income thresholds (current occupants that meet either a standard of low or moderate income, or that have a household income of 150% of the regional average income or less). Caltrans estimates that any surplus property sold in an "as-is" condition to these income-qualified persons would result in repair cost savings of $67,588 on the front end, but any initial savings would likely be offset by a lower property value and sale price. Since the option to sell a property in "as-is" condition may only occur upon request of a prospective buyer who is a current occupant, it is unknown how many of the approximately 470 homes in the SR 710 corridor will be sold "as-is." As such, any fiscal impacts related to this provision are indeterminable. SB 416 would establish the SR 710 Rehabilitation Account and require Caltrans to deposit the proceeds of property sales in the SR 710 corridor into the account. The funds would be continuously appropriated to Caltrans, without regard to fiscal years, for the purpose of providing any necessary repairs to properties offered to specified income-qualified buyers, as required by lenders and government housing assistance programs. Caltrans indicates that the new account would require an initial appropriation of $1.5 million from the State Highway Account to pay for initial repairs to approximately 20 homes. The account would be replenished for future repairs as homes are sold. According to a March 1, 2012 estimate by Caltrans, the market value of the SR 710 parcels is approximately $279 million, although this estimate is not based on an official appraisal. Staff notes that absent the bill, all proceeds from the sales of surplus properties would be deposited into the State Highway Account and available for projects on the state highway system. The requirements of SB 416 would result in a major diversion of revenues from the State Highway Account to the SR 710 Rehabilitation Account for a period of years, likely beginning in 2014-15 and continuing until the last property in the corridor is sold. The draft environmental documents will not be completed for at least another year, and properties will not be declared surplus until a surface option is removed from consideration. Information is not currently available concerning the projected length of time it will take to complete the sale of all of the approximately 470 properties in the corridor. The magnitude of the amounts diverted from the State Highway Account over this period of years is unknown, but could exceed $200 million in the aggregate. Since the funds in the SB 416 (Liu) Page 5 account will be used for property repairs, such as those required by lenders and the federal government when homes are sold to income-qualified occupants, it appears that the majority of the amounts diverted from the State Highway Account is not necessary to achieve the goals of the bill. PROPOSED AUTHOR AMENDMENTS would require any funds in excess of the amount needed to provide repairs would be transferred to the State Highway Account to be used exclusively for eligible projects in the cities of the SR 710 corridor, as specified. The amendments prohibit the use of any proceeds from the sales of corridor homes to advance or construct the proposed SR 710 tunnel. PROPOSED COMMITTEE AMENDMENTS would make the same changes as the proposed author amendments, but would delete the proposed requirement that funds exceeding the amount needed for repairs be used exclusively for eligible projects in the cities of the SR 710 corridor. Instead any excess funds would be transferred to the State Highway Account, pursuant to the requirements in existing law.