BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SB 438
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   August 14, 2013

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                    SB 438 (Hancock) - As Amended:  April 4, 2013 

          Policy Committee:                             Labor and  
          Employment   Vote:                            6-1

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires a refinery employer, by September 15 each  
          year, to submit to the Division of Occupational Safety and  
          Health (DOSH) a full schedule of planned turnarounds for the  
          various plants for the following calendar year.  Specifically,  
          this bill:  

          1)Defines turnaround as any instance of an industrial plant or  
            unit being partially or totally taken offstream or offline for  
            the purposes of maintenance, overhaul, repair, inspection,  
            testing, or replacement of materials or equipment.  

          2)Requires a refinery employer, at the request of DOSH (also  
            known as Cal/OSHA), to submit specified documentation at least  
            60 days prior to a planned turnaround.  The documentation  
            includes equipment and maintenance reports, as specified.  

          3)Requires a refinery employer, at the request of DOSH, to  
            submit the following documentation to them at least 30 days  
            prior to a planned turnaround: 

            Notification of any changes, and supporting documents, with  
            respect to the equipment and maintenance documents submitted  
            above, and written justification by the refinery employer for  
            any of these changes.   

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Annual special fund costs of approximately $875,000 to Cal/OSHA  
          within the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR), to hire  
          additional expert staff to review the reports and provide  








                                                                  SB 438
                                                                  Page  2

          assistance to oil refineries in completing them.  This cost may  
          be offset by potential fee revenue.    

          SB 71 (Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review), Chapter 28,  
          Statutes of 2013, requires DIR to annually establish and collect  
          reasonable fees for consultation, inspection, adoption of  
          standards, and other duties conducted with the Process Safety  
          Unit within DIR to inspect oil refineries and chemical plants.    
          Specifically, statute requires the fees to be adopted by March  
          31, 2014 and deposited into the Occupational Safety and Health  
          Fund. The fees shall be sufficient to support, at a minimum, the  
          annual cost of 15 positions. 

           COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose  .  The California Energy Commission Reports there are a  
            total of 20 refineries in the state located in the San  
            Francisco Bay area, the Central Coast, the Los Angeles area  
            and the Central Valley. Approximately, two million barrels (a  
            barrel is equal to 42 U.S. gallons) of petroleum are processed  
            daily into a variety of products, with gasoline representing  
            about half of the total product volume.

            According to the American Petroleum Institute, a turnaround is  
            "a planned, periodic shut down (total or partial) of a  
            refinery process unit or plant to perform maintenance,  
            overhaul and repair operations and to inspect, test and  
            replace process materials and equipment."  

            According to the author, "Despite the obvious importance of  
            turnarounds, Cal/OSHA is often unaware of when one will occur  
            at an oil refinery. This prevents Cal/OSHA from preparing for  
            a possible incident during a scheduled refinery turnaround.   
            It also means that Cal/OSHA inspectors are left unaware when  
            the last turnaround was done while preparing for and  
            performing inspections of refinery facilities.

            "This is not an abstract concern. Chevron Corp. did not  
            inspect several sections of piping of its Richmond refinery  
            during a November 2011 turnaround.  One of the sections had  
            thinned in thickness by 80 percent, which contributed to the  
            August 6 fire at the facility, one of the worst of such  
            incidents in recent years. The fire led to the hospitalization  
            of 15,000 Richmond residents."









                                                                  SB 438
                                                                  Page  3

            This bill requires a refinery employer, by September 15, to  
            submit to Cal/OSHA a full schedule of planned turnarounds for  
            the various plants for the following calendar year.

           2)Existing law  establishes the California Occupational Safety  
            and Health Act of 1973 to ensure safe and healthful working  
            conditions for all California workers by, among other things,  
            authorizing the enforcement of effective standards as well as  
            assisting and encouraging employers to maintain safe and  
            healthful working conditions. DOSH is charged with enforcing  
            occupational health and safety laws, orders, and standards,  
            including the investigation of alleged violations of those  
            provisions.

            In 1990, the California Refinery and Chemical Plant Worker  
            Safety Act (The Act) was enacted and defined "process safety  
            management" as the application of management programs, which  
            are not limited to engineering guidelines, when dealing with  
            the risks associated with handling or working near hazardous  
            chemicals.  The act requires Cal/OSHA to adopt process safety  
            management standards for refineries, chemical plants, and  
            other manufacturing facilities.  
           
          3)Interagency workgroup on oil refinery safety  .  In 2012,  
            Governor Brown established an interagency workgroup in the  
            aftermath of the fire at Chevron Corp. oil refinery in  
            Richmond, CA.  The workgroup was charged with examining "ways  
            to improve public and worker safety through enhanced oversight  
            of refineries, and to strengthen emergency preparedness in  
            anticipation of any future incident."  The group consisted of  
            participants from 13 agencies and departments, as well as the  
            governor's office.

            In July 2013, the workgroup released a draft report entitled:  
            Improving Public and Worker Safety at Oil Refineries.  The  
            draft document includes findings and recommendations relating  
            to emergency response/preparedness, regulation/oversight,  
            community education/alerts, and safety/prevention of hazardous  
            events.  Specifically, the report states: "Gaps in the  
            regulatory schemes exist, including limitations on their  
            [governmental agencies] ability to cover all aspects of  
            process safety and the extent to which they are enforceable.  
            Regulatory agencies face multiple issues relating to  
            inspection and enforcement capabilities including: difficulty  
            in hiring, retaining, and training inspectors; lack of  








                                                                  SB 438
                                                                  Page  4

            mechanisms for information sharing and coordination;  
            deficiencies in data and transparency; and, insufficient  
            penalties to create meaningful deterrence."



           Analysis Prepared by  :    Kimberly Rodriguez / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081