BILL ANALYSIS �
SB 442
Page 1
Date of Hearing: July 3, 2013
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Mike Gatto, Chair
SB 442 (Wyland) - As Amended: June 15, 2013
Policy Committee: Revenue and
Taxation Vote: 9-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill extends, from sales and use tax law to other tax and
fee programs, the ability of a taxpayer to file a reimbursement
claim with the Board of Equalization (BOE) for bank charges and
other check charge fees incurred because of erroneous processing
or collection action by BOE. This bill also provides that the
taxpayer must file a claim within 90 days of the charges being
incurred.
FISCAL EFFECT
Minor and absorbable costs for BOE and negligible revenue losses
for the state.
COMMENTS
1)Purpose . According to the author, SB 442 would make all
special tax and fee laws administered by BOE the same by
allowing a taxpayer to claim reimbursement resulting from an
erroneous processing action or collection action by BOE. The
author notes SB 442 also provides a taxpayer 90 days from the
date the bank or third party charges were incurred to file
claim with BOE, as opposed to current provisions requiring the
taxpayer to file the claim within 90 days of BOE's erroneous
action. These changes extend the refund provisions found in
the sales and use tax program to the BOE's special tax and fee
programs. The author argues this bill allows BOE to fairly
and equitably administer the sales and use tax program and
special tax and fee programs under the variety of
circumstances that could arise following an erroneous levy or
erroneous processing action by the BOE.
SB 442
Page 2
2)Support . BOE, the sponsor, states this bill parallels
provisions in income tax law, which specifically allow
taxpayers to claim reimbursement for bank charges incurred by
taxpayers through similar types of FTB processing and
collection errors. The California Taxpayers Association
argues it is fair and equitable to reimburse taxpayers for
bank and third-party check charge fees when those charges are
a direct result of a BOE error and are not due to any fault of
the taxpayer or fee payer. The provisions in this bill are
consistent with the sales and use tax law and the intent of
the original legislation that authorized the BOE to reimburse
taxpayers for such charges arising from BOE errors.
3)There is no registered opposition to this bill.
Analysis Prepared by : Roger Dunstan / APPR. / (916) 319-2081