BILL ANALYSIS Ó
SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE BILL NO: SB 469
SENATOR MARK DESAULNIER, CHAIRMAN AUTHOR: Corbett
VERSION: 1/6/14
Analysis by: Nathan Phillips FISCAL: NO
Hearing date: January 14, 2014
SUBJECT:
Aerodynamic devices and tarping systems on trucks
DESCRIPTION:
This bill allows tractor-trailers to exceed length limits by up
to five feet in order to accommodate an aerodynamic device; also
includes tarping systems as exceptions to vehicle width limits.
ANALYSIS:
Aerodynamic devices use technologies that minimize drag and
improve airflow over an entire tractor-trailer vehicle, and
under state law they may not have the primary purpose of
advertising.
Current state law limits the length of vehicles and combinations
of vehicles coupled together from exceeding a total length of 65
feet, with certain, specified exceptions, including an exception
that allows 75-foot long truck tractor-trailer combinations,
provided no trailer exceeds 28 feet, 6 inches. Under existing
law, any extension or device used to increase the carrying
capacity of a vehicle is generally included in measuring the
length of a vehicle, subject to certain exceptions.
Current state law limits the width of a vehicle to no more than
102 inches, with certain exceptions, including that a vehicle
may have an aerodynamic device, as defined, that extends up to 3
extra inches beyond each side of the vehicle. Existing law
prohibits an aerodynamic device from adversely impacting the
vehicle's swept width and turning characteristics.
SB 12 (Corbett), Chapter 727, Statutes of 2012, exempted
aerodynamic devices from width, but not length, limit
calculations.
This bill also replaces the terms "swept width and turning
characteristics" with "turning radius" as they pertain to
SB 469 (CORBETT) Page 2
prohibiting adverse turning characteristics of trucks.
"Tarping Systems" have been defined in federal code for over 11
years, but are not defined in California law. "Tarping Systems"
are defined as "moveable device[s] used to enclose the cargo
area of flatbed semitrailers or trailers."
This bill :
Exempts an aerodynamic device that extends up to five feet
beyond the rear of a vehicle from inclusion in a vehicle's
length calculation if the device does not obscure tail lights
and other required safety devices; and does not have the mass,
strength, or rigidity to damage a vehicle or injure a
passenger in a vehicle that strikes it from the rear.
Prohibits an aerodynamic device from affecting the vehicle's
turning radius, as defined, or interfering with the vehicle's
ability to complete a turn.
Exempts tarping systems that extend up to three inches on a
vehicle side from inclusion in vehicle width limit
calculations.
COMMENTS:
1.Purpose of the bill . This bill purposes to align state law
with federal law in two respects. First, this bill allows
use of aerodynamic devices that extend up to five feet beyond
the length of a truck. Aerodynamic devices reduce air flow
friction and turbulence, thereby improving fuel economy and
reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and improving the stability
of trucks.
Second, this bill exempts tarping systems, extending up to
three inches on each side of a vehicle, from vehicle width
limit calculations. The addition of tarping systems to this
bill is at the request of the CHP. Because it would change
the same section of the Vehicle Code proposed for aerodynamic
devices, it makes sense to include tarping systems in this
bill.
Both changes (aerodynamic device and tarping systems) will
SB 469 (CORBETT) Page 3
provide consistency with other states and makes compliance
easier for trucks travelling in multiple states.
2. Bill History . Last year, by a 37-0 vote, the Senate
passed a similar bill, SB109 (Corbett).
The author amended SB109 to address another matter. This bill
includes an element not in SB 109 (tarping systems).
3. Triple referral . The Rules Committee has referred this bill
to this committee and both the Governance and Finance
Committee and the Appropriations Committee. The Rules
Committee made these referrals based on the previous version
of this bill. The author deleted that language from the bill
with the January 6th amendments.
POSITIONS: (Communicated to the committee before noon on
Wednesday,
January 8, 2014.)
SUPPORT: ATDynamics Inc.
California Police Chiefs Association, Inc.
California Trucking Association
OPPOSED: None received.