BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 472 Page 1 Date of Hearing: August 14, 2013 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION Isadore Hall, Chair SB 472 (Hill) - As Amended: August 5, 2013 SENATE VOTE : Vote not relevant SUBJECT : Gaming: licenses. SUMMARY : Ensures the continued operations of the card club located at the Hollywood Park Racetrack. Specifically, this bill : 1)Authorizes the California Gambling Control Commission (CGCC) to exempt specified limited partners in limited partnerships from specified licensing requirements solely for the purposes of the licensure of a car club located on any portion of the grounds upon which a racetrack is or had been previously located and horse racing meetings were authorized to be conducted by the California Horse Racing Board (CHRB) on or before January 1, 2012, that is owned by a limited partnership that also owns or owned a racetrack. 2)Exempts from specified licensing requirements a person who is licensed or had an application to be licensed on file with CGCC on or before February 1, 2013, has a financial interest in a business or organization engaged in gambling prohibited by state law that was closed and was not engaged in prohibited gambling at a time the person was either licensed or had filed an application to be licensed or had filed an application to be licensed with the CGCC, and has a financial interest in a gambling establishment that is located on any portion the grounds on which a racetrack is or had been previously located and horserace meetings were authorized to be conducted by CHRB on or before January 1, 2012, that is directly or indirectly owned by a racetrack limited partnership owner, as defined. 3)Requires an exempted person, within three years of the date the closed business or organization reopens or becomes engaged in any form of prohibited gambling, as specified, to either divest that person's interest in the business or organization, or divest that person's interest in the gambling enterprise or gambling establishments for which the person is licensed or has applied to be licensed by CGCC. SB 472 Page 2 4)Specifies that during the three year divestment period it is unlawful for any cross-promotion or marketing to occur between the business or organization that is engaged in any form of gambling, as specified. 5)Defines "cross-promotion or marketing" as offering to any customers of the gambling enterprise or gambling establishment anything of value related to visiting or gambling at the business or organization engaged in any form of gambling, as specified. 6)Requires an exempted person to inform CGCC within 30 days of the date on which a business or organization in which the person has a financial interest begins to engage in any form of prohibited gambling, as specified. 7)Extends from 30 to 45 days the time after receipt of an order by CGCC within which a person must apply for a gambling license or a finding of suitability EXISTING LAW 1)The Gambling Control Act (Act) provides for the licensure of certain individuals and establishments involved in various gambling activities, and for the regulation of those activities, by CGCC. 2)Provides that a person is deemed unsuitable to hold a state gambling license to own a gambling establishment if the person, or any partner, officer, director, or shareholder of the persons, has any financial interest in any business or organization that is engaged in a prohibited form of gambling, whether within or without this state, except as specified. 3)Requires, under the Act, for every person who is required to hold a state license to obtain the license prior to engaging in the activity or occupying the position with respect to which the license is required, except as specified. 4)Existing law requires every person who, by order of CGCC, is required to apply for a gambling license or a finding of suitability to file an application within 30 calendar days after receipt of that order. SB 472 Page 3 5)Provides, under the Act, that if the owner of a gambling enterprise is not a person, the owner is not eligible for a gambling license unless specified persons involved in the enterprise obtain a gambling license. 6)Authorizes CGCC to exempt specified limited partners in limited partnerships from the licensing requirements described above solely for the purpose of the licensure of a card club located on the grounds of a racetrack that is owned by a limited partnership that also owns the racetrack. 7)Provides that a person is deemed unsuitable to hold a state gambling license to own a gambling establishment if the person, or any partner, officer, director, or shareholder of the person, has any financial interest in any business or organization that is engaged in a prohibited form of gambling, whether within or without this state, except as specified. 8)Allows a person or entity to hold a state gambling license if they have a financial interest in another business that conducts lawful gambling outside the state that, if conducted within California, would be unlawful, provided that an applicant or licensee may not own more than one percent interest in that business. FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown COMMENTS : Background : According to information provided by the author, the Hollywood Park Racetrack and Card Club is owned by a group of public pension plan investors. Some of those same public pension plans also own a share of the currently closed Sahara Hotel in Las Vegas, which is undergoing capital improvements and remodeling. Current law exempts the actual pension plans from being licensed as card club owners, provided that the card clubs is located at an "operating" racetrack. However, current law also prevents an entity owning a card club in California from also owning an interest in a gambling facility that operates gaming which is prohibited in California. The original purchase of the Sahara Hotel by the pension plans was made under the assumption at that time, that leasing out the SB 472 Page 4 gaming casino at both the card club at Hollywood Park and the Sahara Hotel would avoid the prohibition referenced above. This assumption was found to be incorrect as it is not allowed under current law. Last year AB 1290 (Hill) was introduced to address which individuals would need to be licensed at the card club and an exemption for ownership of the Sahara Hotel by the same pension plans. The legislation was not enacted. As a result, the managers of the pension plan funds agreed to be licensed by the CGCC. Purpose of the bill : According to the author, SB 472 only applies to a card club located at a racetrack. Once the Sahara Hotel in Las Vegas, Nevada reopens for business, the owners of the Hollywood Park Casino would have three years to divest ownership of either the card club or the Sahara Hotel. The permanent legislative exemption proposed last year is no longer being sought, but simply a reasonable divestment period of three years to divest of the card club or the hotel. The author further contends that the bill will address a technical issue to clarify that the pension plans themselves do not have to be licensed at a card club at a racetrack, as long as the managers of their funds are licensed, which is now occurring. However, current law requires the card club to be located at an operating racetrack. Since this is the racetrack's last year of operating live horse racing, the owners of the Hollywood Park Casino have been advised that there is a need to make a technical change to this section to allow for the same section to apply after horseracing ceases. Arguments in Support : According to the Hollywood Park Racetrack, many of the same public pension plans which own the Hollywood Park card club, also purchased, in 2007, the Sahara Hotel in Las Vegas. At the time of that purchase the card club at Hollywood Park and the casino in Las Vegas were operated by lessees, on a flat rent basis, with the pension plans having no stake in the actual outcome of the gaming. Hollywood Park Racetrack further states that it was believed at the time, that such a structure would comply with current law. Unfortunately, that is not the policy of the State, and as a result, it will be necessary for the pension plans to divest ownership of either the card club or the casino once the Sahara Hotel is reopened for business. SB 472 Page 5 SB 472 simply allows for a reasonable 3-year divestment process, once the Sahara Hotel reopens. It also prohibits any "cross promotion" marketing between the card club and the Sahara Hotel during the 3 year divestment period. Arguments in Opposition : Artichoke Joe's Casino argues that it is inappropriate to create exemptions in law for one particular cardroom or even a small minority of cardrooms. For similar reasons, Artichoke Joe's opposed SB 356 (Yee), which would allow cardroom owners to also have an ownership interest in foreign based casinos. It would be more appropriate for the Legislature to debate cardroom ownership laws in their entirety, rather than considering piece-mill legislation that creates exemptions in law for a limited number of entities. Related Legislation . SB 356 (Yee), 2013-2014 Legislative Session. The bill would allow a person or entity with a financial interest in a foreign gambling operation to retain a California Gambling license. (Pending in Assembly Appropriations Committee) Previous Legislation : AB 1290 (Hill), 2011-2012 Legislative Session. The bill would have repealed an existing body of law in the Act relative to an exemption from licensing requirements for a card club on the grounds of a racetrack and recast that body of law. The bill was intended to ensure the continued operations of the card club located at the Hollywood Park Racetrack. (Held in the Inactive File on the Senate Floor) AB 3068 (Horton), Chapter 868, Statutes of 2006. The bill extended the provisions which apply to a publicly traded corporation owning a card club located on the grounds of the entity's racetrack to a limited liability company or a limited partnership. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION : Support Communities for California Cardrooms Hollywood Park Racetrack Opposition SB 472 Page 6 Artichoke Joe's Casino Bicycle Casino Commerce Casino Hawaiian Gardens Hustler Casino Analysis Prepared by : Felipe Lopez / G. O. / (916) 319-2531