BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION Carol Liu, Chair 2013-2014 Regular Session BILL NO: SB 505 AUTHOR: Jackson AMENDED: April 1, 2013 FISCAL COMM: Yes HEARING DATE: April 10, 2013 URGENCY: No CONSULTANT:Lenin Del Castillo SUBJECT : Education Technology. SUMMARY This bill realigns the provisions in current law that support the use of technology through the California Technology Assistance Project (CTAP) and the State Education Technology Services (SETS) projects by moving them under the K-12 High Speed Network (K12HSN) to create a consolidated technology support system. This bill also extends the sunset date for CTAP and the SETS projects from January 1, 2014, to January 1, 2017. BACKGROUND Current law authorizes the CTAP to provide a regionalized network of technical assistance to schools and school districts on the implementation of education technology. CTAP is composed of regional consortia that work collaboratively with school districts and county offices of education to meet locally defined technology based needs. CTAP's functions include providing technical services to support access, planning, and use of high-speed telecommunications networks as well as providing technology planning and implementation assistance to rural and technologically underserved school districts and county offices of education. Current law also authorizes the SETS projects, which consist of the California Learning Resource Network (CLRN), the Technology Information Center for Administrative Leadership (TICAL), and Technical Support for Education Technology in Schools (TechSETS). CLRN helps teachers select online materials by conducting a review of SB 505 Page 2 electronic learning resources, such as software and video, for alignment with content standards. TICAL provides professional development for education administrators in areas of data-driven decision making, integrating technology into standards-based curriculum, and technology planning, operations, and management. TICAL also maintains a web portal that features resources for administrators to assist with digital school leadership. TechSETS provides resources and support for school technology staff through an online interactive help desk, professional development, and assistance with planning and installing technology infrastructures. The 2012 Budget Act includes $14.1 million in Proposition 98 General Fund for the California Technology Assistance Project (CTAP) and the State Education Technology Services (SETS) projects but these funds are "flexed" and school districts may utilize them for any educational purpose. CTAP and the SETS projects are scheduled to sunset on January 1, 2014. Current law authorizes the K-12 High Speed Network (K12HSN), which is operated by a consortium consisting of the Imperial County Office of Education, Butte County Office of Education, and Mendocino County Office of Education. K12HSN provides participating schools and local education agencies with network connectivity, internet services, network diagnostic services, teaching and learning application coordination, and videoconferencing coordination and support. The K12HSN also administers public school participation in the California Research and Education Network (CalREN), which is the high-speed, high-bandwidth statewide network of hub sites and circuits linking all K-12, University of California, California State University, and community college node sites. CalREN is also linked to a national network, forming an advanced state and national (intranet) for educational use. California's participation in CalREN allows network and internet services to be provided to nearly 8,000 schools, 861 school districts, and all of the county offices of education in the state, servicing nearly 4.8 million students. The 2012 Budget Act includes $8.34 million in Proposition 98 General Fund for the K12HSN. ANALYSIS SB 505 Page 3 This bill realigns the provisions in current law that supports the use of technology through CTAP and the SETS projects by moving them under the K12HSN to create a consolidated technology support system. More specifically, this bill: 1) Removes the requirement for the Superintendent of Public Instruction to use a competitive grant process to select a local educational agency as the Lead Education Agency to administer the K12HSN. 2) Requires the K12HSN's statewide coordination of network uses to instead be used for support services that benefit teaching and learning with the common core standards and in support of the computer-adaptive assessment system adopted by the State Board of Education. 3) Requires the K12HSN to provide centralized statewide educational technology services that address regional and statewide needs and are more efficiently and effectively provided or coordinated on a statewide basis to support the common core standards and computer-adaptive assessments implemented by the State Board of Education. The statewide educational technology services to be supported include, but are not limited to: a) The review of electronic learning resources. b) Professional development focused on digital school leadership for educational administrators. c) Access for schools for training, support, and other resources for technical professionals. d) Statewide coordination of a regional assistance program to provide technical assistance to schools and school districts in the implementation of digital learning resources and tools. 4) Requires the K-12 High Speed Network (K12HSN) advisory SB 505 Page 4 board to annually report its recommendations for measuring the success of the network, improving network oversight, and monitoring, strengthening accountability, and optimizing the use of the K12HSN and its ability to improve education to the Legislature, the Governor, the Department of Finance, the president of the State Board of Education, and the Legislative Analyst's Office. 5) Removes an outdated provision of the Lead Agency of the K12HSN to contract for an independent evaluation. 6) Requires the duties of the Lead Agency of the K12HSN to include: a) Entering into appropriate contracts to provide identified needs that are more efficiently and effectively provided on a statewide basis, as specified. b) Entering into appropriate contracts for regional consortia to meet the locally defined educational needs of school districts as they address common core standards curriculum and computer-adaptive assessments that can be addressed effectively with the use of technology, as specified, but including professional development, electronic learning resources, hardware, and telecommunication infrastructure. Additionally, this bill extends the sunset date for the California Technology Assistance Project (CTAP) and the State Education Technology Services (SETS) projects from January 1, 2014, to January 1, 2017. STAFF COMMENTS 1) Need for the bill . CTAP and the SETS projects currently operate under categorical flexibility and the Proposition 98 funds provided for these programs can be diverted for any other educational purpose by local school districts. These programs are scheduled to sunset on January 1, 2014. The K12HSN is currently not subject to categorical flexibility and therefore its funding remains dedicated for the program. According to the author, while these programs serve an SB 505 Page 5 important statewide function in the delivery of education technology based services; there is a lack of coordination among the programs. By moving CTAP and the SETS projects under the K12HSN, this bill would extend the technology services these programs currently provide and also create a more coordinated service delivery system by consolidating the programs. The author believes this support system will be valuable as schools prepare to transition to the recently adopted common core standards and computer-based assessment system. 2) Staff Amendments . It is unclear why extending the sunset date for CTAP and the SETS projects in Section 2 of the bill is necessary given that the bill already proposes to place these statutory provisions under the sections of law pertaining to the K12HSN. Therefore, staff recommends that Section 2 be removed from the bill. Staff also recommends that the bill be amended to establish an accountability system regarding the expenditure of funds for the K12HSN in which a school district must meet specified preconditions that include the development of a plan, in conjunction with parents and teachers, to accelerate pupil progress towards academic proficiency. Proposition 98 funds for CTAP and the SETS projects are currently subject to categorical flexibility. By moving the statutory provisions for these programs under the K12HSN, this bill could help provide a dedicated source of funds for them because funding for the K12HSN is not currently flexed. An accountability system would help ensure these funds are spent in the most cost effective manner. 3) Governor's Local Control Funding Formula . As part of the 2013-14 Governor's Budget, the Administration proposes to restructure the existing K-12 finance system and eliminate over 40 existing programs while also repealing, what the Administration determines are countless "discretionary" provisions of statute, while implementing a new formula known as the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF). The LCFF would consolidate the vast majority of state categorical programs and revenue limit apportionments into a single source of SB 505 Page 6 funding (12 categorical programs, including Special Education, Child Nutrition, Preschool, and After School programs, would be excluded). The LCFF proposal would also eliminate the statutory and programmatic requirements for almost all existing categorical programs - the programs would be deemed "discretionary" and programs in any of these areas would be dependent on local district discretion. To the extent that the LCFF or a modified version of it is adopted as part of the budget, the majority of currently required categorical activities would be left to local districts' discretion. Therefore, the new technology support system under the K12HSN proposed by this bill could be diluted, eliminated, rendered obsolete or discretionary at the local level. SUPPORT Superintendent of Public Instruction (sponsor) OPPOSITION None on file.