BILL ANALYSIS Ó
SB 505
Page 1
Date of Hearing: August 6, 2014
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Mike Gatto, Chair
SB 505 (Jackson) - As Amended: August 4, 2014
Policy Committee: Public
SafetyVote:7-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: Yes
SUMMARY
This bill requires, except in exigent circumstances, and
provided sufficient identifying information is available through
"reasonable" efforts, a peace officer to search the Department
of Justice (DOJ) Automated Firearms System (AFS) via the
California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS) to
determine if a person is the registered owner of a gun, before
checking on the welfare or well-being of that person, if the
check is motivated by a concern the person may be a danger to
self or others.
FISCAL EFFECT
Current law authorizes such AFS checks now, at the discretion of
the officer and department policy. This bill creates a
reimbursable mandate that would allow law enforcement entities
to file state mandate claims for AFS searches in a welfare check
situation in which the subject is suspected of being a danger to
self or others. AFS checks are generally conducted via office or
patrol car terminals, and take only a few minutes. But by making
these checks mandatory, the state must pay for all such checks
statewide.
Extrapolating from the number of service calls by the LA
Sheriff's Office that would likely fall under this proposal, if
L.A. City and County conducted 30 related welfare checks per day
total, spending an average of 15 minutes obtaining
identification and running it through CLETS, the annual mandated
cost of the CLETS checks would be about $140,000. Assuming L.A.
City and County account for 33% of the state mandate, the
statewide cost would be in the range of $400,000.
SB 505
Page 2
COMMENTS
1)Rationale . The author's intent, citing the recent Isla Vista
shooting spree by Elliot Rodger near the UC Santa Barbara
campus, is to require law enforcement to use the existing AFS
system by computer link or phone to determine the presence of
guns prior to making safety checks on persons to determine if
they are a danger to self or others. (Law enforcement is
authorized, but not required, to do so now.)
According to the author, "Although law enforcement may not
have had the legal authority to seize Elliott Rodger's three
guns had they known about them, a gun database search could
have provided additional information that might have helped
them better assess the danger that Rodger posed to himself and
others. Law enforcement could potentially have asked Rodger
what he intended to do with the guns, asked to see the guns,
or asked him to voluntarily surrender the guns.
"We will never know for sure if the outcome in Isla Vista
might have been different with a gun database search, but the
next time California experiences a similar tragedy, we
shouldn't be left wondering. Searches of the gun database can
be done in as little as 90 seconds, and those 90 seconds can
help save lives."
2)This bill was a gut and amend in the Assembly and has not been
heard in this form in the Senate .
Analysis Prepared by : Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081