BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 505 Page 1 Date of Hearing: August 6, 2014 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Mike Gatto, Chair SB 505 (Jackson) - As Amended: August 4, 2014 Policy Committee: Public SafetyVote:7-0 Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: Yes Reimbursable: Yes SUMMARY This bill requires, except in exigent circumstances, and provided sufficient identifying information is available through "reasonable" efforts, a peace officer to search the Department of Justice (DOJ) Automated Firearms System (AFS) via the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS) to determine if a person is the registered owner of a gun, before checking on the welfare or well-being of that person, if the check is motivated by a concern the person may be a danger to self or others. FISCAL EFFECT Current law authorizes such AFS checks now, at the discretion of the officer and department policy. This bill creates a reimbursable mandate that would allow law enforcement entities to file state mandate claims for AFS searches in a welfare check situation in which the subject is suspected of being a danger to self or others. AFS checks are generally conducted via office or patrol car terminals, and take only a few minutes. But by making these checks mandatory, the state must pay for all such checks statewide. Extrapolating from the number of service calls by the LA Sheriff's Office that would likely fall under this proposal, if L.A. City and County conducted 30 related welfare checks per day total, spending an average of 15 minutes obtaining identification and running it through CLETS, the annual mandated cost of the CLETS checks would be about $140,000. Assuming L.A. City and County account for 33% of the state mandate, the statewide cost would be in the range of $400,000. SB 505 Page 2 COMMENTS 1)Rationale . The author's intent, citing the recent Isla Vista shooting spree by Elliot Rodger near the UC Santa Barbara campus, is to require law enforcement to use the existing AFS system by computer link or phone to determine the presence of guns prior to making safety checks on persons to determine if they are a danger to self or others. (Law enforcement is authorized, but not required, to do so now.) According to the author, "Although law enforcement may not have had the legal authority to seize Elliott Rodger's three guns had they known about them, a gun database search could have provided additional information that might have helped them better assess the danger that Rodger posed to himself and others. Law enforcement could potentially have asked Rodger what he intended to do with the guns, asked to see the guns, or asked him to voluntarily surrender the guns. "We will never know for sure if the outcome in Isla Vista might have been different with a gun database search, but the next time California experiences a similar tragedy, we shouldn't be left wondering. Searches of the gun database can be done in as little as 90 seconds, and those 90 seconds can help save lives." 2)This bill was a gut and amend in the Assembly and has not been heard in this form in the Senate . Analysis Prepared by : Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081