BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �






          SENATE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT & RETIREMENT    BILL NO:  SB 523
          Jim Beall, Chair            HEARING DATE:  April 22, 2013
          SB 523 (Correa)    as amended   4/01/13      FISCAL:  YES

           CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES:  OVERSIGHT OF LOCAL  
          MERIT SYSTEM STANDARDS
           
           HISTORY  :

            Sponsor:  Orange County Employees Association

            Other legislation:  AB 1062 (Jones-Sawyer), 2013
                          Currently in Assembly Judiciary Committee
           
          SUMMARY  :

          This bill would provide that Orange County shall not be  
          entitled to an administrative waiver of all or part of a  
          local agency merit system by the State Personnel Board (SPB)  
          if the county is found to be out of compliance with a  
          merit-based personnel system pursuant to an audit by the  
          county or by SPB.  Although the bill specifies SPB, this  
          statutory function was transferred to CalHR by the DPA/SPB  
          consolidation and technical amendments to the code are  
          pending to reflect the transfer of responsibility to CalHR.

           BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS  :
          
          1)   Existing law  :

             a)   under the California Constitution, creates and  
               designates SPB as the responsible agency for  
               administering the state employee civil service system  
               and ensuring that state employment is based on merit and  
               free of political patronage.

             b)   merged operations of the former Department of  
               Personnel Administration (DPA) and SPB into a new,  
               consolidated agency, California Department of Human  
               Resources (CalHR).

             c)   retains the independence and autonomy of the State  
               Personnel Board with regard to hearing matters related  
          Glenn A. Miles
          Date:  4/16/13                                          Page  
          1









               to the merit principle for state civil service  
               employees, as required in the Constitution and clarifies  
               that SPB will continue to hear cases and prescribe rules  
               consistent with the merit principle for state employees.

             d)   vests CalHR with the jurisdiction and responsibility  
               of establishing and maintaining personnel standards on a  
               merit basis and administering merit systems for local  
               government agencies where such merit systems of  
               employment are required by statute as a condition of a  
               state-funded program or a federal grant-in-aid program  
               established under federal law.

             e)   permits local agencies to establish their own merit  
               system and determine thereunder the personnel standards  
               to be applicable to their employees, but as to employees  
               engaged in administering state and federally supported  
               programs such local systems and standards shall be  
               subject to approval and review by CalHR to the extent  
               necessary to qualify for federal funds.

             f)   permits CalHR to waive administration of all or part  
               of a local agency merit system after the approval of a  
               legally binding memorandum of understanding negotiated  
               between the local agency governing board and an employee  
               organization recognized pursuant to applicable law  
               representing employees engaged in federally supported  
               programs.

             g)   provides that CalHR shall grant such waivers upon  
               request of the local agency governing board and the  
               recognized employee organization on any or all standards  
               following determination by CalHR that the provisions of  
               the memorandum of understanding maintain merit system  
               standards to the extent necessary to qualify for federal  
               funds.

             h)   requires that all merit system standards waivers  
               shall be subject to periodic audit, approval, or  
               revocation by CalHR.

          2)   This bill  :

          Glenn A. Miles
          Date:  4/16/13                                          Page  
          2









             a)   provides that Orange County shall not be entitled to  
               an administrative waiver of all or part of a local  
               agency merit system by CalHR if the county is found to  
               be out of compliance with a merit-based personnel system  
               pursuant to an audit by the county or by CalHR.

             b)   makes findings and declarations by the Legislature  
               that a special law is necessary and that a general law  
               cannot be made applicable within the meaning of Section  
               16 of Article IV of the California Constitution because  
               of the need to implement recruitment, hiring, and  
               promotion standards in the County of Orange, consistent  
               with the findings of the 2008 report by the Orange  
               County Grand Jury on the county human resources  
               department and the 2011 audit of the Human Resources  
               Department of Orange County by the Office of the  
               Performance Audit Director for Orange County.

           COMMENTS  :

          1)  Arguments in Support  :  

           According to the author's office, this bill is necessary to  
          address significant concerns regarding the integrity of the  
          merit-based personnel system in Orange County.  In the past  
          ten years the Orange County Human Resources Department (HRD)  
          has been reviewed seven times by the Orange County Grand  
          Jury, three times by consultants, twice by the State, and  
          three times by the County's Internal Audit Department with  
          many of these reviews detailing "significant deficiencies in  
          the HR department, which remain today."  The most recent  
          performance audit, initiated at the direction of the Board of  
          Supervisors, "outlines a troubling number of instances (75  
          total) where classification/compensation standards were not  
          followed, including hidden management pay raises without  
          proper justification and preferential hiring practices within  
          the County of Orange for political appointees in what is  
          believed to be a violation of California's merit system  
          rules."

          The Orange County Employees Association (OCEA) states that  
          the bill "is critical to the preservation and proper  
          administration of merit system standards in the County of  
          Glenn A. Miles
          Date:  4/16/13                                          Page  
          3









          Orange."  According to OCEA, "the County has been unable or  
          unwilling to comply with merit system standards.  In fact,  
          the County's ongoing practice had been to disregard those  
          standards whenever it determined it was preferable to do so  
          for either administrative or political reasons." "SB 523 will  
          in no way impinge upon Orange County's ability to administer  
          its own merit system unless it elects to administer that  
          system in violation of civil service statutes."

          2)   SUPPORT  :

            Orange County Employees Association (OCEA), Sponsor

          3)   OPPOSITION  :

            None to date




                                      #####
          



















          Glenn A. Miles
          Date:  4/16/13                                          Page  
          4