BILL ANALYSIS Ó
SB 537
Page 1
SENATE THIRD READING
SB 537 (Banking and Financial Institutions Committee)
As Amended May 16, 2013
Majority vote
SENATE VOTE :36-0
BANKING & FINANCE 11-0 APPROPRIATIONS 17-0
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|Ayes:|Dickinson, Morrell, |Ayes:|Gatto, Harkey, Bigelow, |
| |Achadjian, Blumenfield, | |Bocanegra, Bradford, Ian |
| |Bonta, Chau, Gatto, | |Calderon, Campos, |
| |Harkey, Linder, Perea, | |Donnelly, Eggman, Gomez, |
| |Weber | |Hall, Holden, Linder, |
| | | |Pan, Quirk, Wagner, Weber |
| | | | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY : Makes technical and clarifying changes to several sections
of the Financial Code administered by the Department of Financial
Institutions (DFI) and to provisions of the Franchise Investment Law
administered by the Department of Corporations (DOC). Specifically,
this bill :
1)Standardizes, within the Franchise Investment Law, the length of
time in which franchisors have to deliver disclosure documents to
prospective franchisees at least 14 calendar days, and updates
state law references to the document used by franchisors to
provide specified information to prospective franchisees, by
referring to this document as a "franchise disclosure document"
rather than an "offering circular."
2)Corrects, within the Financial Code, a heading reference, updates
state law to reflect changes in minimum levels of federal deposit
insurance limits, deletes references to obsolete code sections,
corrects incorrect code section references, restores code section
references that were inadvertently deleted, and adds clarifying
language and definitions.
EXISTING LAW :
1)Authorizes DFI to administer provisions of the Financial Code
regulating the activities of state-chartered banks and industrial
loan companies, state-chartered credit unions, money transmitters,
SB 537
Page 2
trust companies, and insurance premium finance companies
(Divisions 1 through 7 of the Financial Code).
2)Authorizes DOC to administer the Franchise Investment Law
(Division 5 of the Corporations Code).
3)Effective July 1, 2013, reorganizes DFI and DOC as divisions
within a new Department of Business Oversight (Government
Reorganization Plan No. 2).
FISCAL EFFECT : None
COMMENTS : This bill is a technical clean-up bill to various
provisions of the Financial Code. The following summarizes the
purpose of the proposed amendments to the Financial Code:
1)Correct the heading of Division 1, Article 4, Chapter 7 to restore
applicability of the provisions in this article to banks. This
article was incorrectly titled by SB 664 (Banking and Financial
Institutions Committee), Chapter 243, Statutes of 2011.
2)Reflect the increase in federal deposit insurance from $100,000 to
$250,000 (Section 1805).
3)Amend references to incorrect code sections and delete references
to obsolete code sections (Sections 155, 185, 329, 376, 413, 563,
1024, 1026, 1080, 1255, 1495, 1515, 1702, 1805, 1806, 1835, 1858,
4805.01, 4805.02, 4805.05, 4805.10, 4821,5, 4822, 4823, 4824,
4826.5, 4827, 4827.3, 4827.7, 4871.5, 4877.03, 4901.5, 4961.5,
4970, 4982, 4990, 4995, and 18003).
4)Clarify to which law or laws a particular section applies
(Sections 101, 103, 133, 171, 189, 326, 331, 377, and 600).
5)Conform language to the Money Transmission Act definition of a
money transmitter (Sections 185 and 329).
6)Add clarifying language and definitions (Sections 186, 187, 188,
190, 329, 405, 589, 590, 672, 1331, 1473, 1485, and 1495).
7)Restore inadvertently deleted code section references (Sections
SB 537
Page 3
329 and 1485).
8)Simplify an unnecessarily complicated definition (Section 379).
9)The following summarizes the purpose of the proposed amendments to
the Franchise Investment Law:
a) SB 998 (Cox), Chapter 101, Statutes of 2007, required
disclosure documents to be delivered by franchisors to
prospective franchisees 14 calendar days, rather than 10
business days, before that prospective franchisee signs any
franchise agreement. However, that legislation failed to
revise all of the sections that required revision, in order to
effect its change. This bill would make the changes
inadvertently omitted from SB 998.
The Federal Trade Commission, North American Securities
Administrators Association, and California regulations refer to the
disclosure document required to be provided by franchisors to
prospective franchisees as a franchise disclosure document.
However, some provisions of California's Franchise Investment Law
continue to refer to this document by its old name ("offering
circular"). This bill standardizes the references to this document
in California law by deleting references to "offering circular" and
replacing them with references to "franchise disclosure document."
Analysis Prepared by : Mark Farouk / B. & F. / (916) 319-3081
FN: 0001597