BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  SB 538
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   July 3, 2013

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                     SB 538 (Hill) - As Amended:  April 1, 2013 

          Policy Committee:                             Banking and  
          Finance      Vote:                            9-1

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill makes various changes to the Corporate Securities Law  
          of 1968.  Specifically, this bill: 

          1)Authorizes the Department of Corporations (DOC) Commissioner  
            to charge a renewal fee of up to $35 to licensed broker-dealer  
            agents and investment adviser representatives.

          2)Authorizes DOC commissioner to apply to the appropriate  
            superior court for a civil judgment of imposed penalties after  
            the exhaustion of administrative penalties for a violation of  
            the Securities Law.

          3)Ensures consistency with federal law by updating anti-fraud  
            provisions in the securities law.

          4)Makes numerous technical changes to ease administration of the  
            Corporate Securities Law.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Assuming the DOC charges a renewal fee in the range of $25 to  
          $35, resulting in $7.5 million to $10 million in special fund  
          revenue to the DOC.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose  .  According to the author, broker-dealers, investment  
            advisers, and their employees perform critically important  
            functions on behalf of Californians, over which the state  
            should provide an appropriate level of oversight.  The author  








                                                                  SB 538
                                                                  Page  2

            notes, particularly in today's extremely low interest rate  
            environment, people are susceptible to aggressive sales  
            pitches on risky investment products that promise high rates  
            of investment return.  Investment advisers have a fiduciary  
            duty to their clients, and broker-dealers are required to  
            ensure that the investments they recommend to their customers  
            are suitable for those customers.  The author states these  
            professionals should not be pitching risky investment products  
            to people for whom these products are inappropriate.  Yet, at  
            the present time the author contends, DOC lacks the resources  
            necessary to ensure that the state's investment professionals  
            are following the law, and adhering to their duties to  
            investors.  

            According to the author, the incremental cost to provide DOC  
            with the examiners it needs to conduct regular regulatory  
            examinations of its securities licensees is miniscule - in the  
            range of $25 to $30 annually.  The author argues the state  
            should do everything possible to protect investors.

           2)Background  .  Broker-dealers are individuals or firms that buy  
            and sell securities, on behalf of customers, or on behalf of  
            themselves.  People who work for broker-dealers are called  
            registered representatives or agents.  Broker-dealers and  
            their agents generally earn money by charging per transaction.  
             Individuals who advise customers on behalf of investment  
            adviser firms are called investment adviser representatives.  

          The law imposes a fiduciary duty on investment advisers in their  
            interactions with their clients, and requires broker-dealers  
            to evaluate the suitability of investments, before they  
            recommend those investments for their clients.  

          California is home to approximately 3,100 licensed broker-dealer  
            firms, which employ approximately 285,000 agents, and to  
            approximately 3,600 licensed investment adviser firms, which  
            employ just over 50,000 representatives.

           3)Examinations  .  Due to funding restraints, broker-dealers,  
            their agents, or investment advisors are usually only reviewed  
            when they file their initial application.  DOC aims to conduct  
            these examinations at least once every four years but this  
            often does not occur because of inadequate resources.  The  
            primary way in which DOC monitors licensees is through  
            complaints that arise from customers.  Dodd-Frank Wall Street  








                                                                  SB 538
                                                                  Page  3

            Reform and Consumer Protection Act has added additional work  
            for DOC by adding approximately 500 investment adviser firms  
            and several thousand investment advisor representatives to  
            DOC's licensee population.  California is one of a handful of  
            states that do not currently impose renewal fees on these  
            entities.  Some other states, like Texas for example, charge  
            $275.

           1)General Fund loan  .  Approximately $18.5 million is currently  
            on loan from the Corporations Fund to the General Fund.  A  
            portion of these funds are from the account used to support  
            oversight of licensed broker-dealer agents and investment  
            adviser representatives.  If these funds were repaid in the  
            near future, it would seem to reduce the need for a fee, or at  
            least lead to a smaller fee, to accomplish the four-year cycle  
            of audits.

           1)There is no registered opposition to this bill.
           

           Analysis Prepared by :    Roger Dunstan / APPR. / (916) 319-2081