BILL ANALYSIS �
SB 558
Page 1
Date of Hearing: July 3, 2013
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Mike Gatto, Chair
SB 558 (Lieu) - As Amended: June 25, 2013
Policy Committee: JudiciaryVote:10-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill amends the reporters' shield law to require:
1)A party or body issuing a subpoena in any civil or criminal
proceeding to a third party to seek the records of a
journalist to provide notice of the subpoena to the journalist
and to the publisher or broadcast station operations manager
that employs or contracts with the journalist at least five
days prior to issuing the subpoena.
2)The above notice to include an explanation of why the
requested records will be of material assistance to the party
or body seeking them and why alternate sources of information
are not sufficient to avoid the need for the subpoena.
FISCAL EFFECT
Any costs to a state or local government entity to comply with
the additional requirements will be minor and absorbable. Any
costs to local governments are not state reimbursable.
COMMENTS
1)Background . The California Constitution (a) prevents a
publisher, journalist, or any other person employed by a
newspaper or other publication, or by any broadcast news
station, from being held in contempt for refusing to disclose
a news source and (b) shields the journalist from contempt for
refusing to disclose any "unpublished information," such as
notes, interviews, or other material gathered in the process
of researching or writing a story. In addition, current law
imposes certain requirements and limitations on efforts to
SB 558
Page 2
obtain a journalist's records or testimony by subpoena,
including a requirement that a journalist who is subpoenaed in
a civil or criminal proceeding be given at least five days'
notice by the party issuing the subpoena that his or her
appearance will be required. These constitutional and
statutory provisions are known as the reporters' shield law.
2)Purpose . Despite the above protections, current law does not
require prior notice to a journalist if the subpoena is issued
to a third party that may be in possession of the records or
other unpublished information of a journalist. This bill
provides this additional protection to journalists.
The author claims the need for this bill is illustrated by
recent reports that the U.S. Department of Justice secretly
collected, pursuant to subpoena, two months of Associated
Press phone records in New York, Hartford, Connecticut, and
Washington, D.C. The department never provided notice to the
Associated Press that it was seeking this information.
This bill is supported by the California Newspaper Publishers
Association.
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081