BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SAFETY Senator Loni Hancock, Chair S 2013-2014 Regular Session B 5 6 6 SB 566 (Leno) As Amended April 11, 2013 Hearing date: April 30, 2013 Health and Safety Code Food and Agriculture Code JM:jr INDUSTRIAL HEMP HISTORY Source: Hemp Industries Association; Vote Hemp Prior Legislation: SB 676 (Leno) 2011, vetoed AB 1147 (Leno) - 2006, vetoed AB 684 (Leno) - 2007, vetoed HR 32 (Strom-Martin) - 1999, adopted AB 388 (Strom-Martin) - 2002, vetoed Support: American Civil Liberties Union; Business Alliance for Commerce in Hemp; California Certified Organic Farmers; California State Grange; California State Sheriffs' Association; California Teamsters Public Affairs Council; Colorganics Inc.; Dash Hemp; Datsusara; Dr. Bronner's Magic Soaps; Drug Policy Alliance; Ecological Farming Association; Hempsteads; Hempy's Inc.; Humboldt Traders; Instituto Laboral de la Raza; Jungmaven Ltd.; Kings County Sheriff David S. Robinson; Knoll Farms; Lafe's Natural BodyCare; The Living Temple; Nutiva, Inc.; Planning and Conservation (More) SB 566 (Leno) PageB League; Santa Barbara Hemp Company; United Food & Commercial Workers 8 Golden State; United Food & Commercial Workers; Western States Council; US Hemp Oil Inc.; Lazy Dog Designs; Hemptopia, Inc. Opposition: California Narcotic Officers' Association; California Police Chiefs' Association; Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs' Association; Orange County Deputy Sheriffs' Association; California Fraternal Order of Police; California Narcotic Officers Association; California Police Chiefs' Association; Long Beach Officers' Association; Los Angeles County Professional Peace Officers' Association; Los Angeles Police Protective League; Riverside Sheriffs' Association; Sacramento Deputy Sheriffs' Association; Santa Ana Police Officers'Association KEY ISSUE SHOULD CALIFORNIA FARMERS BE ALLOWED TO GROW INDUSTRIAL HEMP WHEN AUTHORIZED UNDER FEDERAL LAW? PURPOSE The purposes of this bill are to 1) define "industrial hemp," as specified; 2) define marijuana as excluding industrial hemp; 3) allow the closely-regulated cultivation and processing of industrial hemp, as specified; 4) impose a testing regimen to ensure industrial hemp has no psychoactive properties; and 5) require reports from the Attorney General on any attempts to use the hemp law to circumvent marijuana restrictions and the Hemp Industries Association on the economic impact of hemp (More) SB 566 (Leno) PageC cultivation in California. Existing federal and California law places controlled substances in five schedules, ranked by medical benefit and potential for abuse. Schedule I controlled substances are deemed to have no medical benefits and a high potential for abuse. (21 U.S.C. § 812; Health & Saf. Code 11054-11058.) Existing federal and California law includes marijuana in Schedule I. (21 U.S.C. § 812; Health & Saf. Code § 11054.) Existing California law defines "marijuana" as all parts of the plant Cannabis sativa L., whether growing or not; the seeds thereof; the resin extracted from any part of the plant; and every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of the plant, its seeds or resin. It does not include the mature stalks of the plant, fiber produced from the stalks, oil or cake made from the seeds of the plant, any other compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of the mature stalks (except the resin extracted therefrom), fiber, oil, or cake, or the sterilized seed of the plant which is incapable of germination. (Health & Saf. Code § 11018.) Existing federal law defines marijuana as the following: "All parts of the plant Cannabis sativa L., whether growing or not; the seeds thereof; the resin extracted from any part of such plant; and every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such plant, its seeds or resin. Such term does not include the mature stalks of such plant, fiber produced from such stalks, oil or cake made from the seeds of such plant, any other compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such mature stalks (except the resin extracted therefrom), fiber, oil, or cake, or the sterilized seed of such plant which is incapable of germination." (21 U.S.C. §§ 802 (16) and 812 (10).) Existing federal law separately lists THC as a Schedule I substance. (21 U.S.C. 812 (17).) Federal court decisions have held that THC in Schedule I applies only to synthetic THC, (More) SB 566 (Leno) PageD because "if naturally-occurring THC were covered under THC, there would be no need to have a separate category for marijuana, ? which contains naturally-occurring THC." (Hemp Industries v. DEA (2004) 357 F.3d 1012, 1015, quoting a related case.) Existing law provides that cultivation of marijuana is a felony, punishable by a prison term of 16 months, two years or three years and a fine of up to $10,000. (Health & Saf. Code § 11358.) This bill defines "industrial hemp" as follows: An agricultural field crop limited to the non-psychoactive varieties of the of the plant Cannabis sativa L., and the seeds produced therefrom; Industrial hemp shall have no more than three-tenths of 1% (0.3%) tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) contained in the dry flowering tops; Industrial hemp shall be cultivated and processed exclusively for the purpose of producing the mature stalks of the plant and by-products of the stalk and seed, including oil or cake made from seeds, and other preparations. This bill redefines "marijuana" to exclude industrial hemp when cultivated or processed for defined purposes. This bill defines "industrial hemp" to mean a nonpsychoactive type of the plant Cannabis sativa L. that contains no more than 0.3% THC contained in the flowering tops, and cultivated and processed exclusively for the purpose of producing the mature stalks of the plant, fiber produced from the stalks, oil or cake made from the seeds of the plant, or for other defined purposes. This bill states findings, declarations, and intent of the Legislature in regards to industrial hemp. This bill creates a new division for hemp under the Food and Agriculture Code. (More) SB 566 (Leno) PageE This bill provides for cultivation requirements, minimum acreage, signage, and various plant cultivation prohibitions to allow visual differentiation between hemp and marijuana fields, with exceptions for established agricultural research institutions or seed breeders. This bill includes industrial hemp, hemp seed, oil, yarn, and woven fabrics as products imported under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States of the United States International Trade Commission. This bill provides that a person who grows industrial hemp and is not an established agricultural research institution or seed breeder shall abide by specified sampling and laboratory testing procedures. This bill requires that laboratory test reports be issued by a laboratory registered with the federal DEA and such reports shall state the percentage content of THC, the date and location of samples taken, the Global Positioning System coordinates, and total crop acreage. This bill requires that laboratory test reports be marked with the appropriate test result of "PASSED AS CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL HEMP" or "FAILED AS CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL HEMP" at or near the top of the report. A "passed" result is a THC level at or below 0.3% content in a random sample of dried flowering tops of the industrial hemp grown. This bill requires the testing laboratory to provide not less than 10 original signed copies of the report for the farmer. The farmer shall retain at least one copy of this report for a minimum of two years and he or she shall make copies available to law enforcement and to each person purchasing, transporting, or otherwise obtaining hemp plant materials. This bill provides that industrial hemp be destroyed if (More) SB 566 (Leno) PageF laboratory testing indicates THC content greater than 0.3%. This bill provides that a person who grows hemp with THC content greater than 0.3% not be prosecuted for cultivation or possession of marijuana. This bill authorizes the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) to regulate the development, growth, harvesting, and sale of industrial hemp seeds. This bill authorizes CDFA to promulgate additional regulations to ensure compliance with this division or federal law. This bill defines "established agricultural research institution" and "seed breeder" as follows: An "established agricultural research institution" is a public or private institution or organization that maintains land for agricultural research, including colleges, universities, agricultural research centers, and conservation research centers." A "seed breeder" is an individual or public or private institution or organization that develops viable industrial hemp seed for sale or research. This bill prohibits the possession of hemp resin, flowering tops, or leaves, except as necessary to conduct laboratory testing. This bill requires the following reports by January 1, 2019, or within five years after hemp agriculture is approved under federal law: The Attorney General shall report to the Legislature any incident where marijuana is falsely claimed to be hemp, or where hemp cultivation is used to disguise marijuana cultivation. The Hemp Industries Association shall also provide a (More) SB 566 (Leno) PageG report on the economic impacts of industrial hemp cultivation. This bill provides that this act not be operative unless authorized under federal law. This bill states findings and intent of the Legislature in regard to industrial hemp and this act. RECEIVERSHIP/OVERCROWDING CRISIS AGGRAVATION For the last several years, severe overcrowding in California's prisons has been the focus of evolving and expensive litigation relating to conditions of confinement. On May 23, 2011, the United States Supreme Court ordered California to reduce its prison population to 137.5 percent of design capacity within two years from the date of its ruling, subject to the right of the state to seek modifications in appropriate circumstances. Beginning in early 2007, Senate leadership initiated a policy to hold legislative proposals which could further aggravate the prison overcrowding crisis through new or expanded felony prosecutions. Under the resulting policy known as "ROCA" (which stands for "Receivership/ Overcrowding Crisis Aggravation"), the Committee held measures which created a new felony, expanded the scope or penalty of an existing felony, or otherwise increased the application of a felony in a manner which could exacerbate the prison overcrowding crisis. Under these principles, ROCA was applied as a content-neutral, provisional measure necessary to ensure that the Legislature did not erode progress towards reducing prison overcrowding by passing legislation which would increase the prison population. ROCA necessitated many hard and difficult decisions for the Committee. In January of 2013, just over a year after the enactment of the historic Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011, the State of California filed court documents seeking to vacate or modify the federal court order issued by the Three-Judge Court three years earlier to reduce the state's prison population to 137.5 percent (More) SB 566 (Leno) PageH of design capacity. The State submitted in part that the, ". . . population in the State's 33 prisons has been reduced by over 24,000 inmates since October 2011 when public safety realignment went into effect, by more than 36,000 inmates compared to the 2008 population . . . , and by nearly 42,000 inmates since 2006 . . . ." Plaintiffs, who opposed the state's motion, argue in part that, "California prisons, which currently average 150% of capacity, and reach as high as 185% of capacity at one prison, continue to deliver health care that is constitutionally deficient." In an order dated January 29, 2013, the federal court granted the state a six-month extension to achieve the 137.5 % prisoner population cap by December 31st of this year. In an order dated April 11, 2013, the Three-Judge Court denied the state's motions, and ordered the state of California to "immediately take all steps necessary to comply with this Court's . . . Order . . . requiring defendants to reduce overall prison population to 137.5% design capacity by December 31, 2013." The ongoing litigation indicates that prison capacity and related issues concerning conditions of confinement remain unresolved. However, in light of the real gains in reducing the prison population that have been made, although even greater reductions are required by the court, the Committee will review each ROCA bill with more flexible consideration. The following questions will inform this consideration: whether a measure erodes realignment; whether a measure addresses a crime which is directly dangerous to the physical safety of others for which there is no other reasonably appropriate sanction; whether a bill corrects a constitutional infirmity or legislative drafting error; whether a measure proposes penalties which are proportionate, and cannot be achieved through any other reasonably appropriate remedy; and whether a bill addresses a major area of public safety or criminal activity for which there is no other reasonable, appropriate remedy. (More) SB 566 (Leno) PageI COMMENTS 1. Need for this Bill According to the author: SB 566 will allow California farmers to be some of the most prepared farmers in America to grow hemp once the federal government allows it. Industrial hemp is a variety of the species Cannabis sativa L. that has no psychoactive qualities because it contains less than three-tenths of one percent THC. Even though it is a distant cousin of marijuana, which ranges from three to 15 percent THC content, industrial hemp is not a drug, and it is not marijuana. Hemp is extremely beneficial to farmers and agricultural processors. Because it grows in dense groves, hemp requires little or no pesticides or herbicides. Hemp is also a great crop rotator, as it leaves nutrients in the soil for the next crop. Hemp cultivation will create the need for seed and fiber processing facilities. Investors will support the many hemp companies and processing operations that would employ numerous Californians. Because of the perceived similarity to marijuana, industrial hemp has not been grown in United States since the 1950s; however, the two are very different. The industrial hemp plant is a stalk similar to bamboo, has few branches, and has been bred for maximum production of seed, and grows to a height up to 16 feet. It is planted in densities of 100 to 300 plants per square yard. Marijuana is a tropical variety of cannabis that usually grows to a height of six feet and has been bred to have many branches to maximize flowering and minimize seeding. Unlike hemp, marijuana is planted with wide spaces between plants (More) SB 566 (Leno) PageJ to maximize flowering. This bill is operative only upon federal approval. Federal approval may take several different forms including a federal administrative waiver or a change in law. Industrial hemp legislation has been introduced in both houses of Congress with strong bipartisan support. If the current federal legislation passes, the federal government will defer to states to regulate hemp cultivation. . SB 566 ensures that law enforcement will not be negatively impacted. The bill provides that all flowering tops of the industrial hemp plant, which have no legal commercial application, are not permitted if removed from the field of cultivation. Although hemp flowers have no psychoactive effect, this relieves law enforcement of any need to distinguish hemp from marijuana. For these reasons, the bill enjoys the support of the California State Sheriffs' Association. Hemp must be grown in a minimum of five continuous acres and farmers must post signage to indicate that only industrial hemp is grown. Similar requirements in Canada have thwarted theft of hemp crops. This bill ensures that hemp crops meet the three-tenths of one percent THC standard. Prior to harvest, growers must obtain a report from a DEA registered laboratory documenting the THC content of their crop, the size of the acreage, and its G.P.S. location. Farmers must retain copies of the report for two years, make it available to law enforcement and provide a copy to each person purchasing, transporting, or obtaining the oil, fiber, or seed of the plant. If you do not pass the test, you cannot sell your product. Five years after federal approval, the Attorney General will report to the Legislature on any law enforcement impacts of industrial hemp cultivation. The Hemp Industries Association also is required to (More) SB 566 (Leno) PageK report to the Legislature regarding the economic impacts of hemp cultivation. The California Department of Food and Agriculture will have enforcement authority and implement regulations to ensure that the provisions of the bill are met and there is full compliance with federal approval. 2. Research Studies from Purdue University and the University of Kentucky Evaluating Hemp for Various Applications and Uses Purdue Industrial hemp has received significant attention in recent years. Researchers at Purdue University published an exhaustive study of the potential value for hemp cultivation in the United States.<1> The study noted: Hemp "is extremely unusual in the diversity of products for which it is or can be cultivated." Oilseeds : Hemp seeds produce nutritious oil, high in fatty acids found in fish oils. "[T]hese essential fatty acids ? [serve] as raw materials for cell structure and as precursors for biosynthesis?" Hemp oil contains antioxidants known as "tocopherols." Hemp oils have been used in paints, inks and other similar industrial and personal applications. Fiber : Hemp fibers are strong and durable. China leads in the development of hemp fibers for textiles. Technological advances will be necessary before North American producers can successfully compete with Chinese firms. Pulp and Paper : Hemp is useful for applications such as currency where strength is needed, but is not currently competitive with wood pulp for newsprint and general paper uses. Plastic Composites for Automobiles and Other Manufacturing Uses : Light and strong hemp plastic composites may be particularly valuable. Mercedes currently uses hemp composites. Rising oil prices may make hemp products competitive for plastics. Building Construction Products : Hemp is increasingly used for insulation in Europe. Hemp fiberboard is strong and hemp --------------------------- <1> See http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/ncnu02/v5-284.html. (More) SB 566 (Leno) PageL could be used in high-quality concrete and building products. Animal Bedding and Absorbent Material : Hemp is a superior material for animal bedding. Absorbent hemp stalk cores can be used for oil spills and other pollution control uses. Soil Erosion Control : Hemp materials are useful to control erosion and are good alternatives to plastics for weed control and planting material. Cosmetics : Hemp is popularly used in shampoo, soaps and lotions. Biofuels Potential : Researchers in Europe have touted hemp biofuels. Ecological Benefits of Hemp : [Hemp] is well suited for organic agriculture, and is much less "ecotoxic" than most other crops. Pesticides and fungicides are usually unnecessary. University of Kentucky Study The University of Kentucky released a study in 1998 that reached many of the same conclusions as the Purdue study. The Kentucky study, however, specifically considered how industrial hemp could benefit Kentucky. The study noted that hemp had historically been an important crop in Kentucky. Kentucky produced one-half on national hemp production in the 1800s. Kentucky is well-suited for hemp production because of its soil and relatively long growing season. (Economic Impact of Industrial Hemp in Kentucky (1998) Center for Business and Econ. Res., Univ. of Kentucky.) The Kentucky study was funded by the Kentucky Hemp Museum and Library and the (More) SB 566 (Leno) PageM Deni Montana Foundation.<2> 3. 2010 Congressional Research Report on Hemp The Congressional Research Service wrote a hemp economic analysis in 2010. The report listed the wide uses for hemp products and noted criticisms that the hemp market was limited. However, the report cited the growth of the Canadian hemp industry: "[S]tudies by Canadian agriculture agencies ? provide a more positive market outlook, given growing consumer demand and also certain production advantages to growers, such as relatively low input and management requirements ?" (CSR, 2010, Hemp as an Agricultural Commodity, p. 10.) 4. The THC Issue - Negligible THC in Hemp, High Concentrations of CBD, a THC Chemical Antagonist It is generally accepted that the dominant marijuana "high" is caused by TCH. The prohibition on marijuana is based on the presence of THC in the flowering tops and leaves. Other parts of the plant essentially have negligible THC content. Smoked marijuana generally has about 25 times more THC than hemp. Equally important, hemp contains CBD, an antagonist to THC that cancels the effects of THC. CBD is abundant in industrial hemp, but not in the drug marijuana. A ratio 2:1 CBD to THC suppresses any intoxicating effect of THC. Industrial hemp typically has a CBD-THC ratio of 5:1. Smoking or otherwise ingesting any amount of hemp could not intoxicate someone. Industrial hemp is generally defined as cannabis plants with a THC content of less than 0.3%. The Purdue report states that --------------------------- <2> The museum describes its mission: "The Kentucky Hemp Growers Cooperative Museum & Library was established in October 1994, as a non-profit organization, to educate the public about the cultural, historic and economic importance of the hemp industry in Kentucky and the United States." According to a July 4, 1998 article in the Lexington Herald-Leader, the study cost $23,000. The Deni Montana Foundation appears to be associated with actor Woody Harrelson. (More) SB 566 (Leno) PageN marijuana in the illicit market typically has a THC content of 5-10%. This is about 17-35 times the amount of THC found in industrial hemp. It appears that 0.3% THC became the standard for industrial hemp because this level was the standard for French farmers. France, unlike much of Western Europe, never banned hemp production. Hemp was also unrestricted in the Soviet Union. Russia has developed hemp with lower THC content. Some law enforcement officials have expressed concerns that wide-spread use of hemp products could interfere with drug tests because it could not be determined whether the metabolites of TCH found in blood or urine samples was produced by legitimate hemp seed products or marijuana. The Purdue study found this concern largely unsupported. "Federal US [drug (More) testing] programs utilize a THC metabolite level of 50 parts per billion in urine. Leson (2000) found that this level was not exceeded by consuming hemp products, provided that THC levels are maintained below 5 ppm [parts per million] in hemp oil, and below 2 ppm in hulled seeds."<3> Drug marijuana growers have become extremely sophisticated in producing very strong strains of sinsemilla marijuana (female marijuana plants without seeds) in small spaces. Pollination of drug marijuana by industrial hemp fields would be extremely harmful to drug marijuana growers. Drug marijuana growers would thus not hide marijuana in hemp fields. Drug marijuana growers would seek to avoid being anywhere near hemp fields. Arguments have been made that hemp legalization could be the proverbial camel's nose under the tent leading to marijuana legalization. This argument appears to assume that the public would conclude that the benefits of hemp indicate that marijuana, because it comes from the same species of plant, is an appropriate and beneficial drug. It does not appear that countries that allow hemp cultivation have higher rates of marijuana consumption than comparable countries that do not. While many European countries have authorized hemp cultivation in the last 15 years, marijuana use has not risen with hemp production. Numerous studies have noted that European consumption of marijuana (for intoxication) is much lower than in the United States. (EU Annual Report on Drug Problems in Europe, 2005.) Many European countries with low rates of marijuana use allow hemp cultivation. Marijuana consumption appears to be tied to the urbanization of a country. 5. Legislation Concerning Industrial Hemp in Other Jurisdictions Several states and the federal government have passed or sought to pass hemp legislation. The substance of the proposed legislation has varied, but at least eight states (Hawaii, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland Montana, North Dakota, Oregon and Vermont and West Virginia) have sought to remove barriers to the cultivation of hemp. Hawaii received DEA permission to grow --------------------------- <3> See fn. (2), supra. (More) SB 566 (Leno) PageP industrial hemp on a one-quarter acre of government land under 24-hour security. The Hawaii hemp experiment terminated at the end of September 2003. According to the David P. West, Ph.D., an agronomist hired to conduct the project, the DEA effectively frustrated attempts to fully implement the program. (Kolosov, Evaluating The Public Interest: Regulation Of Industrial Hemp Under The Controlled Substances Act, UCLA Law Review, Vol. 57, No. 1, 2009, p 253.) AB 388 (Strom-Martin), of the 2001-2002 Legislative Session, requested the University of California to conduct a study of the economic opportunities associated with the production of alternative fiber crops, including industrial hemp. The bill was vetoed. In 2005, 2007 and 2009, Representatives Ron Paul (R-TX) introduced federal legislation to exclude industrial hemp from the definition of marijuana. 6. Federal Preemption Issues Generally The federal government can regulate state conduct through the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution. (Art. I, § 8.) The Supreme Court has stated that the Congress can supersede state drug laws because even intrastate drug activity affects the national and international drug trade. "[A]ny commodity, be it wheat or marijuana, has a substantial effect on the supply and demand in the national market for that commodity." (Gonzales v. Raich (2005) 545 U.S. 1, 19.) ***************