BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 566 Page 1 Date of Hearing: August 14, 2013 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE Susan Talamantes Eggman, Chair SB 566 (Leno) - As Amended: August 7, 2013 SENATE VOTE : 39-0 PUBLIC SAFETY 7-0 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Ayes:|Ammiano, Melendez, | | | | |Jones-Sawyer, Mitchell, | | | | |Quirk, Skinner, Waldron | | | |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------| | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- SUBJECT : Industrial hemp. SUMMARY : Allows the regulated cultivation and processing of industrial hemp and its seed, upon federal approval, as specified. Specifically, this bill : 1)Establishes the California Industrial Hemp Farming Act (Act) and provides Legislative findings and declarations. 2)Creates the following definitions for this Act: a) Defines "board" as the Industrial Hemp Advisory Board; b) Defines "commissioner" as the county agricultural commissioner; c) Defines an "established agricultural research institution" as a public or private institution or organization that maintains land for agricultural research, including colleges, universities, agricultural research centers, and conservation research centers; and, d) Defines "industrial hemp" as a fiber or oilseed crop, or both, that is limited to nonpsychoactive types of the plant Cannabis sativa L. and the seed produced therefrom, having no more than three-tenths of 1% tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) contained in the dried flowering tops, and that is cultivated and processed exclusively for the purpose of SB 566 Page 2 producing the mature stalks of the plant, fiber produced from the stalks, oil or cake made from the seeds of the plant, or any other compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of the mature stalks, except the resin or flowering tops extracted therefrom, fiber, oil, or cake, or the sterilized seed of the plant that is incapable of germination. 3)Revises the definition of "marijuana" to clarify that it does not include industrial hemp, as defined in this bill, except where the plant is cultivated or processed for purposes not expressly allowed. 4)Defines the "secretary" as the Secretary (secretary) of [California Department of] Food and Agriculture (CDFA). 5)Defines a "seed breeder" as an individual or public or private institution or organization that is registered with the commissioner to develop seed cultivars intended for sale or research. 6)Defines a "seed cultivar" as a variety of industrial hemp. 7)Establishes within CDFA an Industrial Hemp Advisory Board (board) consisting of 11 members, appointed by the secretary as follows: a) Three of the board members shall be growers of industrial hemp that are registered pursuant to the provisions of this bill. A member of the board who is a grower of industrial hemp shall be a representative of at least one of the following functions: i) Seed production; ii) Seed condition; iii) Marketing; or, iv) Seed utilization. b) Two of the board members shall be members of an established agricultural research institution; c) One member of the board shall be a representative of the SB 566 Page 3 California State Sheriff's Association or other law enforcement association who has experience or a background in agricultural issues; d) One member or the board shall be a county agricultural commissioner; e) One member of the board shall be a representative of the Hemp Industries Association or its successor industry association; f) One member of the board shall be a representative of industrial hemp product manufacturers; g) One member of the board shall be a representative of businesses that sell industrial hemp products; and, h) One member shall be a member of the public. 8)States that the members of the board shall be subject to conflict-of-interest provisions related to financial interest. 9)Limits the term for a board member to three years and if a vacancy occurs, requires the secretary to appoint a replacement member in accordance to member representative requirements. Provides that member shall not receive a salary but may be reimbursed for attendance of board activities. 10)Provides that the board shall advise the secretary and may make recommendations on all matters pertaining to this bill, including, but not limited to, industrial hemp seeds laws and regulations, enforcement, annual budgets required to accomplish the purposes of this bill, and the setting of an appropriate assessment rate necessary for the administration of the provisions in this bill. 11)Requires the board to elect a chair, meet at the call of the chair or secretary, or the request of four board members, but must meet at least once a year to review budget proposals and fiscal matters related to the proposals. 12)Restricts the growing of industrial hemp to the list of approved seed cultivars, except when grown by an established agricultural research institution or a registered seed breeder developing a California cultivar, pursuant to this division. SB 566 Page 4 13)Establishes the list of approved seed cultivars to include those certified by member organizations of the Association of Official Seed Certifying Agencies, including but not limited to, the Canadian Seed Growers Association and the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development. It shall also include California varieties certified pursuant to state requirements. 14)Permits the Secretary to update the list of approved seed cultivars, upon the recommendation by the board or department. 15)Requires before cultivation, a grower of industrial hemp for commercial purposes shall register with the commissioner of the county in which the grower intends to engage in industrial hemp cultivation, except for an established agricultural research institution. Specifies requirements of registration including establishment of a fee. 16)Requires before cultivation, a seed breeder shall register with the commissioner of the county in which the seed breeder intends to engage in industrial hemp cultivation, except for an established agricultural research institution. Specifies requirements of registration including establishment of a fee and requires the reporting of the information to CDFA. 17)Requires CDFA to establish, and each commissioner to collect, an assessment rate to be paid by growers of industrial hemp for commercial purposes and seed breeders, not including an established agricultural research institution, to defray the reasonable costs of each commissioner in implementing and enforcing these provisions. 18)Requires the commissioner of each county to process registrations and renewals within his or her county as economically as possible and each commissioner is to establish registration and renewal fees, and restricts the renewal fee to not more than one-half of the registration fee. 19)Requires that, except when grown by an established agricultural research institution or registered seed breeder developing a California cultivar, industrial hemp shall be grown only as a densely planted fiber or oilseed crop, or both, in acreages of not less than five acres at the same time, and no portion of the acreage of industrial hemp shall SB 566 Page 5 include plots of less than one contiguous acre. 20)Requires a registered seed breeder to grow industrial hemp for purposes of seed production, only as a densely planted crop in acreages of not less than two acres at the same time, and no portion of the acreage of industrial hemp shall include plots of less than one contiguous acre. 21)Prohibits ornamental and clandestine cultivation, as well as the pruning, culling, and tending of individual plants, of industrial hemp and requires all plots to have adequate signage indicating they are industrial hemp. 22)Provides that industrial hemp shall include products imported under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2013) of the United States International Trade Commission. 23)Requires, except when industrial hemp is grown by an established agricultural research institution, a registrant who grows industrial hemp under this section to obtain a laboratory test report indicating the THC levels of a random sampling of the dried flowering tops of the industrial hemp grown before the harvest of each crop and as provided below: a) Sampling shall occur as soon as practicable when the THC content of the leaves surrounding the seeds is at its peak and shall commence as the seeds begin to mature, when the first seeds of approximately 50% of the plants are resistant to compression; b) The entire fruit-bearing part of the plant including the seeds shall be used as a sample. The sample cut shall be made directly underneath the inflorescence found in the top one-third of the plant; c) The laboratory test report shall be issued by a laboratory registered with the federal Drug Enforcement Administration, shall state the percentage content of THC, shall indicate the date and location of samples taken, and shall state the Global Positioning System coordinates and total acreage of the crop. If the laboratory test report indicates a percentage content of THC that is equal to or less than three-tenths of 1%, the words "PASSED AS CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL HEMP" shall appear at or near the top of the laboratory test report. If the laboratory test SB 566 Page 6 report indicates a percentage content of THC that is greater than three-tenths of 1%, the words "FAILED AS CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL HEMP" shall appear at or near the top of the laboratory test report; d) If the laboratory test report indicates a percentage content of THC that is equal to or less than three-tenths of 1%, the laboratory shall provide the person who requested the testing not less than 10 original copies signed by an employee authorized by the laboratory and shall retain one or more original copies of the laboratory test report for a minimum of two years from its date of sampling; e) If the laboratory test report indicates a percentage content of THC that is greater than three-tenths of 1% and does not exceed 1%, the registrant that grows industrial hemp shall submit additional samples for testing of the industrial hemp grown; f) A registrant that grows industrial hemp shall destroy the industrial hemp grown upon receipt of a first laboratory test report indicating a percentage content of THC that exceeds 1% or a second laboratory test report indicating a percentage content of THC that exceeds three-tenths of 1% but is less than 1%. If the percentage content of THC exceeds 1%, the destruction shall take place within 48 hours after receipt of the laboratory test report. If the percentage content of THC in the second laboratory test report exceeds three-tenths of 1% but is less than 1%, the destruction shall take place as soon as practicable, but no later than 45 days after receipt of the second test report; g) The above paragraph does not apply to industrial hemp grown by an established agricultural research institution if the destruction of the industrial hemp grown will impede the development of types of industrial hemp that will comply with the three-tenths of 1% THC limit established in this section; h) A registrant that intends to grow industrial hemp and who complies with this section shall not be prosecuted for the cultivation or possession of marijuana as a result of a laboratory test report that indicates a percentage content SB 566 Page 7 of THC that is greater than three-tenths of 1% but does not exceed 1%; i) The above paragraph does not apply to industrial hemp grown by an established agricultural research institution. Established agricultural research institutions shall be permitted to cultivate or possess industrial hemp with a laboratory test report that indicates a percentage content of THC that is greater than three-tenths of 1% if that cultivation or possession contributes to the development of types of industrial hemp that will comply with the three-tenths of 1% THC limit established in this section; and, j) Except for an established agricultural research institution, a registrant that grows industrial hemp shall retain an original signed copy of the laboratory test report for two years from its date of sampling, make an original signed copy of the laboratory test report available to the department, the commissioner, or law enforcement officials or their designees upon request, and shall provide an original copy of the laboratory test report to each person purchasing, transporting, or otherwise obtaining from the registrant that grows industrial hemp the fiber, oil, cake, or seed of the plant. 24)Provides that all of the following are prohibited: a) The possession, outside of a field of lawful cultivation, of resin, flowering tops, or leaves that have been removed from the hemp plant, except as is necessary to perform testing as previously specified; b) Any ornamental or clandestine cultivation of the industrial hemp plant; c) Any pruning, culling, or tending of individual industrial hemp plants, except when the action is necessary to perform the THC testing as specified; and, d) Any cultivation of industrial hemp in acreages of less than five acres, or any acreage comprised of plots of less than one contiguous acre, except when the industrial hemp is grown by an established agricultural research institution or seed breeder. SB 566 Page 8 25)Mandates, not later than January 1, 2019, or five years after the provisions of this bill are authorized under federal law, whichever is later, the Attorney General to report to the Assembly and Senate Committees on Agriculture and the Assembly and Senate Committees on Public Safety the reported incidents, if any, of the following: a) A field of industrial hemp being used to disguise marijuana cultivation; or, b) Claims in a court hearing by persons other than those specifically exempted that marijuana is industrial hemp. 26)States pursuant to existing law, this section related to the Attorney Generals' report is repealed on January 1, 2023, or four years after the date that the report is due, whichever is later. 27)Requires, not later than January 1, 2019, or five years after the provisions of this bill are authorized under federal law, whichever is later, the board, in consultation with the Hemp Industries Association, to report the following to the Assembly and Senate Committees on Agriculture and the Assembly and Senate Committees on Public Safety: a) The economic impacts of industrial hemp cultivation, processing, and product manufacturing in California; and, b) The economic impacts of industrial hemp cultivation, processing, and product manufacturing in other states that may have permitted industrial hemp cultivation. 28)States that these provisions shall not become operative unless authorized under federal law. 29) Requires, if these provisions become operative, the Attorney General to issue an opinion on the extent of authorization under federal law and California law, the operative date of those provisions, and whether federal law imposes any limitations that are inconsistent with these provisions and shall post the opinion on its Internet Web site. EXISTING LAW defines "marijuana" as "all parts of the plant Cannabis sativa L., whether growing or not; the seeds thereof; SB 566 Page 9 the resin extracted from any part of such plant; and every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such plant, its seeds or resin. Such term does not include the mature stalks of such plant, fiber produced from such stalks, oil or cake made from the seeds of such plant, any other compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such mature stalks (except the resin extracted therefrom), fiber, oil, or cake, or the sterilized seed of such plant which is incapable of germination." Federal law places controlled substances into five schedules ranked by medical benefit and potential for abuse. Schedule I controlled substances are deemed to have no medical benefits and high potential for abuse. Marijuana is listed as a schedule I controlled substance. THC is listed as a separate schedule I substance. As clarified by case law, THC in Schedule I applies only to synthetic THC, because "if naturally-occurring THC were covered under THC, there would be no need to have a separate category for marijuana, ? which contains naturally-occurring THC." [Hemp Industries v. Drug Enforcement Administration (9th Cir. 2004) 357 F.3d 1012, 1015.] FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, the Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) estimates likely minor costs. The Seed Services Program is funded on a fee-for-service basis; thus, hemp seeds would be treated as another kind of seed that has to be labeled in accordance to the seed law. The planting of marijuana amongst hemp could lead to more allegations of bad seed and hence seed complaints that are costly for CDFA to investigate and administer. However, this likelihood is unknown. Additionally, the Department of Justice would incur a one-time, potentially significant General Fund cost to meet the bill's reporting requirements. COMMENTS : According to the author, SB 566 seeks to create an exemption for the cultivation of, and a separate legal definition for, industrial hemp, and places regulatory provisions for the production of hemp into statute. These provisions of the bill become operative only upon federal approval. Industrial Hemp is an agricultural crop that is grown and processed in over 30 countries for paper, clothing, canvas, SB 566 Page 10 rope, food, personal care products, automotive parts, building materials, and many other commercial uses. It has no psychoactive properties in any part of the plant, and is cultivated as an agricultural field crop. Industrial hemp is not planted in the same fashion as marijuana; typically hemp is planted in close spacing and narrow rows, while marijuana is larger spacing and much wider separation of the rows. The exception would be when hemp is grown for the development of a new cultivar or variety, and then plantings may be similar to marijuana plantings. According to estimates by the Hemp Industries Association, the market for industrial hemp products in the United States was $500 million in 2012 and has been growing at a rate of $26 million a year. A large portion of those sales are by California manufacturers of food and personal care products made from hemp seed and oil. . Although both, marijuana and hemp are members of the Cannabis sativa L. species, hemp and marijuana are distinct physically and chemically. Marijuana is a tropical variety of cannabis that grows to a height of six feet. It has been cultivated to grow as a bush with many branches and leaves to maximize the number of flowers where tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) potency is the strongest. Hemp has an appearance similar to bamboo and has few branches and leaves. Unlike marijuana, hemp leaves tend to cluster at the crown of the plant. The most important distinction between hemp and marijuana is that hemp has less than three tenths of one percent THC while marijuana contains three to 25 percent THC. The federal Drug Enforcement Administration has classified industrial hemp as a controlled substance. However, in 2004 the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Drug Enforcement Authority (DEA) did not have the authority to regulate hemp under the Controlled Substances Act of 1970. In addition, the court clarified that the products produced from industrial hemp are legal for possession, sale, and consumption in all parts of the United States. This includes the stalk, fiber, seed, and oil from the plant. The DEA dropped its appeal for that decision and the 9th Circuit Court ruling now stands as U.S. law. SB 566 is structured to relieve law enforcement of the burden of having to discern hemp from marijuana in clandestine groves and SB 566 Page 11 removes any potential federal preemption issues by requiring federal approval for the provisions of the bill to be operative and for hemp cultivation to proceed. Opponents state that industrial hemp cultivation would undermine law enforcements' efforts to curtail illegal marijuana groves and would significantly increase cost of such prosecutions. They state that hemp crops could camouflage illegal plants and cause law enforcement to test all plants for THC before taking action, potentially enabling criminals to escape. Additionally, no state crime lab are equipped to test for THC, and they would need to incur the cost of gearing up for such testing, or have the additional cost of using private labs to conduct the testing. Further, they cite a non-reviewed January 2001 University of Kentucky, Department of Agricultural Economics staff paper titled Industrial Hemp: Legislative Briefing that answers the question 'is hemp profitable for US farmers?' with "the bottom line is we don't know for sure. But, in examining other countries experiences, it looks doubtful. The US has no hemp manufacturing industry to speak of, and demand is small and of questionable durability." Contrarily, a Congressional Research Service paper titled Hemp as an Agricultural Commodity dated March 21, 2013, has concluding remarks stating: "..., the U.S. market for hemp-based products has a highly dedicated and growing demand base, as indicated by recent U.S. market and import data for hemp products and ingredients, as well as market trends for some natural foods and body care products. Given the existence of these small-scale, but profitable, niche markets for a wide array of industrial and consumer products, commercial hemp industry in the United States could provide opportunities as an economically viable alternative crop for some U.S. growers." Two bills have been introduced in Congress, H.R. 525 and S. 359, titled The Industrial Hemp Farming Act of 2013, providing a new definition for industrial hemp and deferring to the states the regulation of hemp. The author continues to work to better define the funding structure with the agricultural commissioners and CDFA. The committee may wish to ask the author his intentions regarding resolving the funding and fee structure. SB 566 Page 12 The committee may wish to consider if the wording in Section 81008(d), page 13, line 20, after the word "or" needs to be amended to read "registered seed breeder in accordance to section 81004." (Any amendments agreed to in this committee would be adopted in the Assembly Committee on Appropriations.) This would make the language consistent with other sections of the bill. Prior Legislation : SB 676 (Leno), of the 2011-12 Legislative Session, would have authorized an eight-year, five-county pilot project with respect to the cultivation and processing of industrial hemp. SB 676 was vetoed. The Governor's veto message stated: "Federal law clearly establishes that all cannabis plants, including industrial hemp, are marijuana, which is a federally regulated controlled substance. Failure to obtain a permit from the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration prior to growing such plants will subject a California farmer to federal prosecution. Although I am not signing this measure, I do support a change in federal law. Products made from hemp - clothes, food, and bath products - are legally sold in California every day. It is absurd that hemp is being imported into the state, but our farmers cannot grow it." AB 684 (Leno), of the 2007-08 Legislative Session, would have permitted the cultivation of industrial hemp in California under a pilot program in five counties. AB 684 was vetoed. AB 1147 (Leno), of the 2005-06 Legislative Session, would have permitted the cultivation of industrial hemp in California. AB 1147 was vetoed. AB 388 (Strom-Martin), of the 2001-02 Legislative Session, requested the University of California to conduct a study of the economic opportunities associated with the production of alternative fiber crops, including industrial hemp. AB 388 was vetoed. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION : Support SB 566 Page 13 Hemp Industries Association (Co-Sponsor) Vote Hemp (Co-Sponsor) American Civil Liberties Union California Alliance with Family Farmers California Certified Organic Farmers California State Grange California State Sheriffs' Association Colorganics, Inc. County of Lake Dash Hemp Santa Cruz Datsusara Dr. Bronner's Magic Soaps Drug Policy Alliance Ecological Farming Association HempAware Hempteads Hemptopia Inc. Hempy's Inc. Humboldt Traders Instituto Laboral de la Raza Jungmaven Ltd. Kern County Sheriff Kings County Sheriff Knoll Farms LLC Lafe's Natural Body Care Nutiva Inc. Planning and Conservation League Santa Barbara Hemp Company The Hemp Road The Living Temple U.S. Hemp Oil United Food & Commercial Workers 8/Golden State United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 5 United Food & Commercial Workers Western States Council Opposition California Narcotic Officers' Association California Police Chiefs Association San Diego County Sheriff's Department Analysis Prepared by : Jim Collin / AGRI. / (916) 319-2084 SB 566 Page 14