Amended in Senate January 15, 2014

Amended in Senate January 6, 2014

Amended in Senate September 11, 2013

Amended in Senate April 9, 2013

Senate BillNo. 579


Introduced by Senator Berryhill

February 22, 2013


An act to add and repeal Section 4751 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to developmental services.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SB 579, as amended, Berryhill. Developmental services: Commission on Oversight Efficiency and Quality Enhancement Models.

The Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act authorizes the State Department of Developmental Services to contract with regional centers to provide services and supports to individuals with developmental disabilities. The services and supports to be provided to a regional center consumer are contained in an individual program plan, developed in accordance with prescribed requirements.

The California Community Care Facilities Act provides for the licensure and regulation of community care facilities, including residential facilities, adult day programs, small family homes, and group homes, by the State Department of Social Services.

Existing law requires the State Department of Public Health to license and regulate various types of health facilities, and requires the State Department of Public Health and the State Department of Developmental Services to jointly develop and implement licensing regulations appropriate for intermediate care facilities/developmentally disabled-nursing and intermediate care facility/developmentally disabled-continuous nursing.

This bill would establish the Commission on Oversight Efficiency and Quality Enhancement Models to investigate methods of implementing a unified and consistent oversight and quality enhancement process that ensures the welfare, community participation, health, and safety of individuals with developmental disabilities who are served in programs licensed by the Community Care Licensing Division of the State Department of Social Services. The bill would require the process to also enhance accountability and quality review processes for the services directly provided by regional centers.begin delete The bill would state the intent of the Legislature that the State Department of Developmental Services identify regional center catchment areas for voluntary participation in a pilot project consistent with the recommendations of the commission.end delete The bill would require the Governor, Senate Committee on Rules, and the Speaker of the Assembly to appoint members to serve on the commission, as prescribed.

The bill would require the commission to recommend a strategy for uniform data collection that provides reliable, valid, and actionable data from multiple stakeholder perspectives and that may be consistently deployed at regional centers. This bill would require the commission to review current regulations and relevant statutes to better focus on reliable data to measure outcomes for individuals served and the impact of services on the lives of individuals and their families, in accordance with prescribed characteristics. The bill would require the commission, by June 30, 2015, to determine the best methods for collecting input on relevant regulatory standards and statutes, and to request public input on those standards, as specified. The bill would require the commission to review and compile, by September 30, 2016, the input received and to submit, by December 31, 2016, a report on its recommended regulatory and statutory changes to the Legislature and the State Department of Developmental Services.

This bill would require the commission to propose, in its report, a process by which relevant regulations and statutes governing the Licensing and Certification Division of the State Department of Public Health may be reviewed by a future commission.

begin delete

This bill would require regional centers that seek consideration for participation in any program to pilot new quality enhancement systems to collect baseline data, as determined by the commission, in programs and services for people with developmental disabilities that are licensed by the Community Care Licensing Division of the State Department of Social Services. These

end delete

begin insertTheseend insert provisions would be repealed on January 1, 2018.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P3    1

SECTION 1.  

Section 4751 is added to the Welfare and
2Institutions Code
, to read:

3

4751.  

(a) The Legislature finds and declares all of the
4following:

5(1) Evaluation of the services that people with developmental
6disabilities receive from both service providers and regional centers
7is a critical component of the service system.

8(2) There is evidence that the current system, in which three
9state-funded entities, the State Department of Developmental
10Services, the regional centers, and the Community Care Licensing
11Division of the State Department of Social Services, are charged
12 with monitoring and maintaining quality services and supports for
13people with developmental disabilities, is duplicative and confusing
14and fails to produce data essential for service improvement.

15(3) The efficiency and efficacy of the oversight and quality
16review processes can be significantly enhanced by unifying the
17current duplicative quality review system, thus conserving limited
18state and service providers’ resources while simultaneously
19improving the lives of people with developmental disabilities in
20California.

21(b) The Commission on Oversight Efficiency and Quality
22Enhancement Models is established to investigate methods of
23implementing a unified and consistent oversight and quality
24enhancement process. This process shall ensure the welfare,
25community participation, health, and safety of all those with
26developmental disabilities who are served in programs currently
27licensed by the Community Care Licensing Division of the State
28Department of Social Services. The commission shall give the
29utmost attention to ensure that the results of its work do not reduce
30the quality of oversight and monitoring of the health and safety of
31persons with developmental disabilities. This process shall also
32enhance accountability and quality review processes for the
P4    1services directly provided by regional centers. begin delete At the conclusion
2of the investigation, it is the intent of the Legislature that, based
3upon the information, analysis, and recommendations of the
4commission, the State Department of Developmental Services
5shall identify regional center catchment areas for voluntary
6participation in a pilot project consistent with the recommendations
7of the commission.end delete

8(c) The commission shall be composed of not more than 12
9begin delete members.end deletebegin insert members as follows:end insert

begin delete

10(1) The Governor, the Senate Committee on Rules, and the
11Speaker of the Assembly shall each appoint three members to serve
12on the commission consistent with subparagraphs (A) and (B).

end delete
begin delete

13(A) The appointed members shall meet both of the following
14requirements:

end delete
begin delete

15(i) Have professional experience in quality assurance within the
16developmental disabilities field.

end delete
begin delete

17(ii) Represent statewide organizations.

end delete
begin delete

18(B) Each appointing authority shall appoint a member
19representing, as broadly as possible, each of the following areas:

end delete
begin delete

20(i) The service provider community.

end delete
begin delete

21(ii) The advocacy and consumer services community.

end delete
begin delete

22(iii) Regional centers.

end delete
begin insert

23(1) Three public members appointed by the Senate Committee
24on Rules, with one appointee who is from the advocacy community,
25one appointee who is a provider of day program services, and one
26appointee who represents regional centers.

end insert
begin insert

27(2) Three public members appointed by the Speaker of the
28Assembly, with one appointee who is a consumer or family member,
29one appointee who is a provider of residential services, and one
30appointee who represents regional centers.

end insert
begin insert

31(3) Three public members appointed by the Governor with the
32consent of the Senate. The Governor shall request and consider
33nominations of persons from the advocacy community, the provider
34community, the regional center system, consumers and family
35members, and subject experts in data collection and licensing
36oversight for these appointments.

end insert
begin delete

6 37(2)

end delete

38begin insert(4)end insert The State Department of Developmental Services, the State
39Department of Social Services, and the California Health and
P5    1Human Services Agency may each select a representative to
2participate on the commission.

3(d) The commission may appoint advisory groups to provide
4specialized input to assist the commission in its work.

5(e) The commission shall examine existing regulations and
6 statutes, and recommend changes to the State Department of
7Developmental Services, as specified in subdivision (g).

8(f) (1) The commission shall recommend, and include in its
9final report, a strategy for uniform data collection that provides
10reliable, valid, and actionable data from multiple stakeholder
11perspectives and that may be consistently deployed at regional
12centers. The strategy shall address, to the fullest extent possible,
13all of the following:

14(A) Service provider and regional performance.

15(B) Outcomes consistent with individual program plan goals.

16(C) Flexibility of implementation.

17(D) Field-based data entry and analysis.

18(E) Documentation, measurement, and analysis of the strategy’s
19implementation.

20(F) Usage of data currently being collected by regional centers
21and the State Department of Developmental Services.

22(G) Regional center and service provider resource needs to
23implement the strategy.

24(2) The commission shall consider, but is not limited to, the
25experience, outcomes, and data provided by the National Core
26Indicators, the Agnews Developmental Center, and the Bay Area
27Quality Management System, and from current quality reviews of
28unlicensed Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act
29support models, including family home agencies and supported
30living, in developing the strategy’s structure, standards, and data
31collection methodologies.

32(g) The commission shall review current sections in Titles 17
33and 22 of the California Code of Regulations and relevant statutes
34to better focus on reliable data to measure outcomes for individuals
35served and the impact of services on the lives of individuals and
36their families. Recommendations for the strategy and regulatory
37change shall reflect the following characteristics:

38(1) Be lean, simple, efficient, and understood by the people
39served and those who serve them.

P6    1(2) Avoid unnecessary redundancies of process, permissions,
2oversight, and enforcement.

3(3) Base objective reviews on quality standards that, in
4accordance with Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services
5Act principles, address individual outcomes, including, but not
6limited to, health, safety, independence, choice, empowerment,
7inclusion, and participation in community life. Outcome measures
8are to be consistent with performance measures for regional centers.

9(4) Base subjective reviews of the impact on individuals and
10families on satisfaction data collected by an independent third
11party that surveys a statistically significant sample of service
12providers and individuals and families providing or receiving those
13services.

14(5) Shift the focus of quality efforts to a service enhancement
15model that encourages and recognizes service provider and regional
16center improvements.

17(6) Include multiple options for proactive consumer protections,
18including screening for qualified providers, an emphasis on an
19evolving improvement system of coaching and mentoring service
20providers toward quality, and an immediate response capacity to
21address people in imminent danger.

22(7) Report aggregate service and individual outcomes to
23highlight excellence, innovation, and satisfaction in the services
24provided and in the lives of individuals with developmental
25disabilities.

26(8) Enhance transparency, accountability, quality standards, and
27measurement processes for the services directly provided by
28regional centers consistent with regional center performance
29contracts.

30(9) Provide consumers, families, service providers, and regional
31center staff the opportunity to participate in system evaluation.

32(10) Ensure that the results of oversight, quality enhancement,
33and assurance review activities are available in plain language to
34people with developmental disabilities and their families so they
35can be informed consumers of the services that they receive.

36(h) (1) On or before June 30, 2015, the commission shall
37determine the best methods of collecting input on relevant statutes
38and sections of Titles 17 and 22 of the California Code of
39Regulations.

P7    1(2) These methods shall include, but not be limited to, the
2following:

3(A) At least two public meetings, with one meeting held in
4southern California and one meeting held in northern California.

5(B) The electronic submission of comments.

6(3) The commission shall request public input concerning the
7revision, retention, or removal of relevant statutes and sections of
8Titles 17 and 22 of the California Code of Regulations affecting
9only programs meeting both of the following:

10(A) Under the partial or exclusive oversight of the Community
11Care Licensing Division of the State Department of Social Services.

12(B) Provide services and supports exclusively or primarily to
13persons with developmental disabilities.

14(4) The commission shall solicit comment on issue areas
15including, but not limited to, the following:

16(A) Certification and vendorization processes.

17(B) Complaints.

18(C) Quality oversight and monitoring requirements.

19(D) Decertification and devendorization processes.

20(E) Conflict and duplication in statutes and regulations.

21(i) (1) On or before September 30, 2016, the commission shall
22review and compile the input received based on its relevance to
23the criteria described in subdivision (g). On or before December
2431, 2016, the commission shall submit to the Legislature and the
25State Department of Developmental Services a report on its
26recommended changes to Titles 17 and 22 of the California Code
27of Regulations and any recommended statutory changes. The
28commission shall also recommend, based on input received, the
29most effective entity or entities for enforcing the regulations.

30(2) In its report, the commission shall propose a process by
31which relevant regulations and statutes governing the Licensing
32and Certification Division of the State Department of Public Health,
33guided by the criteria described in subdivision (g), may be reviewed
34by a future commission if one is established.

begin delete

35(j) From January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016, inclusive,
36regional centers that seek consideration for participation in any
37program to pilot new quality enhancement systems shall collect
38baseline data, as determined by the commission, on existing service
39quality and quality assurance processes in programs and services
40for people with developmental disabilities that are licensed by the
P8    1Community Care Licensing Division of the State Department of
2Social Services.

end delete
begin delete

14 3(k)

end delete

4begin insert(j)end insert A report to be submitted pursuant to subdivision (i) shall be
5submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government
6Code.

begin delete

17 7(l)

end delete

8begin insert(k)end insert This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2018,
9and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that
10is enacted before January 1, 2018, deletes or extends that date.



O

    95