Amended in Assembly August 13, 2013

Amended in Assembly June 25, 2013

Amended in Senate April 18, 2013

Senate BillNo. 582


Introduced by Senator Knight

(Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Harkey)

February 22, 2013


An act to add Section 39 to the Revenue and Taxation Code, relating to taxation.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SB 582, as amended, Knight. Tax information: administration.

Existing law imposes various taxes that are administered by the Franchise Tax Board, the State Board of Equalization, and the Employment Development Department.

This bill would requirebegin insert, on or before January 1, 2015,end insert the Franchise Tax Board, the State Board of Equalization, and the Employment Development Department to collaborate and focus the agencies’ current and future information technology efforts to conduct a feasibility study on the development of a single Internet Web site portal that virtually consolidates the agencies to enable online, self-service access to the agencies, as providedbegin insert, and to submit the study to the Legislatureend insert. This bill would also require these agencies, upon a joint determination by the agencies that a need exists to improve cost-effective services to taxpayers and an appropriation by the Legislature, to consolidate forms, applications, and other documents to reduce or eliminate the number of multiple submissions of the same information by taxpayers.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:

3(a) California relies on three separate state agencies to administer
4and enforce its major taxes.

5(b) To obtain assistance and comply with California’s tax laws,
6policies, and procedures, many taxpayers must interact with all
7three agencies, and frequently with multiple departments within
8those agencies.

9(c) While this system has performed reasonably well in many
10respects, the multiagency nature of the system is prone to certain
11inherent problems, difficulties, and inefficiencies, and is
12particularly complex for taxpayers required to comply with
13 California’s tax laws.

14(d) Over the past decades, numerous reports have been prepared
15and various legislative proposals have been considered on the topic
16of coordination and cooperation among these three agencies. The
17focus of these efforts range from relatively minor aspects of
18increased cooperation to proposals for full consolidation of the
19agencies under “one roof.”

20(e) Focusing on the customer should be a core element of
21California’s tax administration. Taxpayers should not have to
22understand complex government structures and relationships in
23order to interact with the government, particularly in a sensitive
24area like taxes.

25(f) The California Tax Service Center, available at
26www.taxes.ca.gov, provides an assortment of independent
27departmental forms, returns, and links, tied together by a common
28homepage on the Internet, and is intended to provide California
29taxpayers with resources and educational programs with a goal as
30a one-stop tax assistance hub.

31(g) The California Tax Service Center can be used to better
32serve California’s taxpaying community by virtually consolidating
33the three agencies’ operations to enable them to appear as one
34unified organization with the goal of providing a seamless
P3    1experience for taxpayers in their online interactions with the
2agencies.

3(h) It is therefore in California’s best interest to develop an
4Internet Web-based, taxpayer-focused system that virtually
5consolidates the State Board of Equalization, the Franchise Tax
6Board, and the Employment Development Department. In
7developing a taxpayer-focused system, the fundamental objective
8should be a platform that provides an integrated experience for
9taxpayers, to enable online self-service access with a single logon
10for all three agencies, and to provide pertinent and essential
11information that will enable taxpayers to satisfy their payment and
12reporting obligations, obtain real-time information pertinent to
13their individual accounts, and provide assistance that will enable
14taxpayers to achieve optimum compliance with California’s
15complex tax system.

16

SEC. 2.  

Section 39 is added to the Revenue and Taxation Code,
17to read:

18

39.  

begin deleteTheend deletebegin deleteend deletebegin insert(a)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insert(1)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insertOn or before January 1, 2015, theend insert board, the
19Franchise Tax Board, and the Employment Development
20Department shall collaborate and focus their current and future
21information technology efforts to conduct a feasibility study on
22the development of a single Internet Web-based portal that virtually
23consolidates the agencies to enable online, self-service access
24through a single logon for taxpayers to electronically file returns,
25submit forms or other information, determine account balances
26and due dates of taxes, remit amounts due, identify the status of
27any appeal, claim for refund, request for relief of interest or penalty,
28and any other information the agencies deem helpful to the taxpayer
29to assist in compliance with the state’s tax laws.begin delete As part of this
30effort, upon a joint determination by the agencies that a need exists
31to improve cost-effective services to taxpayers and an appropriation
32by the Legislature, these agencies shall also consolidate forms,
33applications, and other documents to reduce or eliminate the
34number of multiple submissions of the same information by
35taxpayers.end delete
begin insert The feasibility study shall consider California Tax
36Service Center Internet Web site in its analysisend insert
begin insert.end insert

begin insert

37(2) The feasibility study shall be conducted with the existing
38budgets of the board, the Franchise Tax Board, and the
39Employment Development Department. An appropriation shall
40not be made by the Legislature to fund the feasibility study.

end insert
begin insert

P4    1(3) The feasibility study shall be submitted to the Legislature
2no later than six months after the study is completed and shall be
3submitted in compliance with Section 9795.

end insert
begin insert

4(4) This subdivision shall become inoperative on January 1,
52018, pursuant to Section 10231.5.

end insert

6begin insert(b)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insertAs part of this effort, upon a joint determination by the
7agencies that a need exists to improve cost-effective services to
8taxpayers and an appropriation by the Legislature, these agencies
9shall also consolidate forms, applications, and other documents
10to reduce or eliminate the number of multiple submissions of the
11same information by taxpayers.end insert



O

    96