BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE BILL NO: sb 600 SENATOR MARK DESAULNIER, CHAIRMAN AUTHOR: lieu VERSION: 4/23/13 Analysis by: Erin Riches FISCAL: yes Hearing date: April 30, 2013 SUBJECT: Vehicles: alternative fuel conversions DESCRIPTION: This bill requires the state Air Resources Board (ARB) to revise its procedures for small manufacturers seeking ARB certification of alternative fuel conversion systems. ANALYSIS: Existing law requires ARB to adopt standards and regulations on all classes of motor vehicles that will result in, among other things, reductions in motor vehicle exhaust and evaporative emissions. Under this authority, ARB regulates both new and in-use vehicles, engines, and equipment. Fuel conversion systems modify vehicles and engines so they can run on different fuels than the ones for which they were originally designed. Most alternative fuel conversions involve reconfiguring a gasoline or diesel vehicle or engine to operate on an alternative fuel such as natural gas, propane, alcohol, or electricity. Prior to selling a fuel conversion system, a manufacturer must obtain ARB certification to ensure that the vehicle, engine, or equipment meets state emission standards. ARB's alternative fuel conversion regulations apply to all vehicles, regardless of age. Although ARB has not updated these regulations since 1995, it is currently conducting a rulemaking process to consider a number of revisions. The federal Clean Air Act prohibits manufacturers from altering a vehicle or engine from its certified configuration. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) regulations exempt alternative fuel conversion manufacturers from this prohibition if they can demonstrate that the conversion does not compromise emissions compliance with federal clean air standards. US EPA recently amended its alternative fuel SB 600 (LIEU) Page 2 conversion regulations in an attempt to streamline the compliance process. Among other things, the revised regulations: Eliminate the requirement for manufacturers annually to recertify the Clean Air Act exemption for each vehicle and engine; Provide three sets of conversion certification requirements, depending on vehicle and engine age; Allow manufacturers to use one set of data to support the conversion certification application of a subsequent year's test group or engine family; Allow manufacturers, for mixed-fuel and dual-fuel conversions, to submit a statement of compliance in lieu of test data on the original fuel if the manufacturer can attest that the conversion maintains original certification standards. This bill requires ARB, beginning January 1, 2014, in reviewing applications from small volume manufacturers for certification of alternative fuel conversion systems, to: Use the revised US EPA test procedures. Certify to federal tailpipe emission standards and On-Board Diagnostics II (smog check) standards, provided the manufacturer meets or improves upon the standards to which the original equipment manufacturer certified on the original fuel. Automatically qualify alternative fuel conversion certifications for after-market certifications on new vehicles upon manufacturer request. Use commercially available fuel for all required emissions testing. Conduct evaporative emissions testing on the added alternative fuel system only when seeking to certify a dual-fuel vehicle conversion. This bill also requires ARB, beginning January 1, 2014, to extend a new vehicle or engine certification until December 31st of the year following a given model year. SB 600 (LIEU) Page 3 COMMENTS: 1.Purpose . The author states that ARB review and certification of a fuel conversion application can take more than three months, while US EPA performs the same review in approximately two weeks. Conversion companies estimate that testing and paperwork for US EPA certification costs around $50,000, while ARB certification can run $300,000 or more. In addition, ARB-required test fuel can cost $100 per gallon for natural gas as compared to $2 per gallon for commercially available fuel. By lowering the costs and review time for certification, this bill will enable small volume manufacturers of alternative fuel conversion systems to get cleaner vehicles on the road more quickly. 2.Why convert to alternative fuel ? Converting a vehicle from gasoline or diesel fuel to an alternative fuel such as compressed natural gas or propane can significantly reduce its level of smog-forming emissions. In California, the number of particulate matter-related cardiopulmonary premature deaths is 9,200 per year. Not only can emissions reductions achieved by alternative fuel conversions help reduce those deaths, but it can also help California meet federal clean air standards and state greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals. In addition, alternative fuels often enable a vehicle to run less expensively, enhancing their appeal to consumers. 3.US EPA vs. ARB standards . Federal law authorizes California to carry out and enforce its own - more stringent - vehicle emissions regulations for vehicles sold and registered in California. Federal law also allows other states to adopt California's emissions regulations for new vehicles, which more than a dozen states have done or are in the process of doing. To obtain either federal or ARB certification, a converted vehicle must meet the same emissions requirements as the original vehicle. The testing also ensures that the retrofit system works properly with the on-board diagnostics (OBD) system to warn the driver, and record for a smog check technician, when emissions exceed approved levels. One of the key differences between federal and state fuel conversion regulations is that federal regulations provide different sets of requirements for different vehicle ages; for example, US EPA regulations allow a manufacturer to sell an after-market system under an expired certification if the system is to be installed on a vehicle that is more than two model years old. SB 600 (LIEU) Page 4 In addition, the revised federal regulations allow manufacturers to combine vehicle and engine test groups, alleviating some of the costs to demonstrate emissions benefits of alternative fuel systems. 4.Extending the length of certification . Current ARB regulations limit conversion certifications to December 31st of the calendar year of the applicant vehicle's model year. This bill's co-sponsor, the Western Propane Gas Association, notes that by the time a new vehicle or engine is certified, there is often only a narrow window left in which to sell the vehicle. By extending certification life, this bill will provide manufacturers with more time to sell their inventory. 5.ARB response time . The author of this bill states that ARB review and certification of a fuel conversion application can take more than three months. ARB asserts that it responds to manufacturers within 30 days after it receives an application and completes reviews within 90 days. ARB further states that due to improvements implemented last year, reviews averaged 30 days in 2012. 6.Is this bill premature ? In response to numerous industry inquiries, ARB is currently soliciting input and holding workshops with interested manufacturers - including the sponsors of this bill - as it considers aligning its alternative fuel conversion certification procedures with those of US EPA. ARB expects to complete this rulemaking process, which includes many of the issues outlined in this bill, in fall 2013. If the final rule addresses all the issues included in this bill, this bill will be unnecessary. If the final rule does not address all these issues, and this bill becomes law, ARB will have to initiate a new rulemaking process to adopt the changes. 7.Previous legislation . SB 724 (Dutton) of 2011 would have required ARB to respond within 30 working days to an application for certification of a new, carryover, or partial carryover on-road or off-road vehicle, engine, or equipment family. The Legislature passed SB 724 without a single "no" vote but Governor Brown vetoed the bill. His veto message stated that "this bill could interfere with the iterative information gathering application approval process, thereby rushing the process and inadvertently allowing vehicles with defective emission components on the market." SB 600 (LIEU) Page 5 POSITIONS: (Communicated to the committee before noon on Wednesday, April 24, 2013.) SUPPORT: California Natural Gas Vehicle Coalition (co-sponsor) Clean Energy Western Propane Gas Association (co-sponsor) OPPOSED: None received.