BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        SB 606|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                    THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 606
          Author:   De León (D)
          Amended:  5/7/13
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 4/30/13
          AYES:  Hancock, Anderson, Block, De León, Knight, Liu, Steinberg

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE :  Senate Rule 28.8


           SUBJECT  :    Harassment:  child or ward

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill provides that it is a crime punishable by  
          imprisonment for any person who intentionally harasses a child  
          or ward of any other person because of that person's employment,  
          as specified.

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law:

          1. Provides that a person who has "suffered harassment" may seek  
             a temporary restraining order and an injunction to prevent  
             such harassment.  "Harassment" is defined thus:  "[U]nlawful  
             violence, a credible threat of violence, or a knowing and  
             willful course of conduct directed at a specific person that  
             seriously alarms, annoys, or harasses the person, and that  
             serves no legitimate purpose.  The course of conduct must be  
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 606
                                                                     Page  
          2

             such as would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial  
             emotional distress, and must actually cause substantial  
             emotional distress to the plaintiff."  

          2. Provides that an employer may seek a temporary restraining  
             order and injunction on behalf of an employee who has been  
             harassed at work through unlawful violence or a credible  
             threat of violence.  In the discretion of the court, the  
             order and injunction can be applied to additional employees  
             and workplaces of the employer.

          3. Provides that it is a misdemeanor for any person to  
             intentionally harass a child because of the employment status  
             of the child's parent or parents.  The offense is punishable  
             by a six month jail term, a $1000 fine, or both.  A defendant  
             must serve a jail term of at least five days for a second  
             conviction, and at least 30 days for a third or subsequent  
             conviction.

          4. Includes the following definitions:

             A.    "Harasses" means "knowing and willful conduct  
                directed at a specific child that seriously alarms,  
                annoys, torments, or terrorizes the person, and which  
                serves no legitimate purpose.  The conduct must be such  
                as would cause a reasonable child to suffer substantial  
                emotional distress, and actually cause the victim to  
                suffer that distress."

             B.    A child, for purposes of this crime, is a person  
                under the age of 16 years.

          This bill: 

          1. Provides any person who intentionally harasses a child or  
             ward of any other person because of that person's employment  
             shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail for not  
             less than 10 days but not exceeding one year.

          2. Provides that a second conviction is a fine not exceeding  
             $10,000 and by imprisonment in a county jail for not less  
             than 30 days but not exceeding one year. 

          3. Provides that a third or subsequent conviction is a fine not  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 606
                                                                     Page  
          3

             exceeding $10,000 and imprisonment in a county jail for a  
             period of not less than 60 days. 

          4. Specifies that harassment may include any actual or attempted  
             recording of the child's image or voice without the written  
             consent of the child's parent or legal guardian, by following  
             the child's activities or lying in wait. 

          5. Includes the following definitions:

             A.    "Child" and "ward" for purposes of this crime, means  
                a person under 16 years of age.

             B.    "Harasses" means knowing and willful conduct directed  
                at a specific child that seriously alarms, annoys,  
                torments, or terrorizes the child, and that serves no  
                legitimate purpose, including, but not limited to, any  
                actual or attempted recording of the child's image or  
                voice, or both, without the written consent of the  
                child's parent or legal guardian, by following the  
                child's activities or lying in wait.  The conduct must  
                be such as it would cause a reasonable child to suffer  
                substantial emotional distress, and actually cause the  
                victim to suffer substantial emotional distress.

             C.    "Employment" means the job, vocation, occupation, or  
                profession of the parent or legal guardian of the child  
                or ward.

          6. Creates a civil cause of action under which the parent or  
             guardian of a child who was harassed because of the  
             employment of the parent or guardian may seek actual damages,  
             disgorgement of profits, punitive damages and attorney's fees  
             and costs. 

           Background
           
          AB 3592 (Umberg, 1994) was adopted to protect children who would  
          be susceptible to retaliatory attacks because of their parents'  
          employment.  The bill made the intentional harassment of a child  
          because of their parents' employment a misdemeanor.  AB 3592 was  
          meant to specifically address the increased harassment faced by  
          the children of health care facility employees where abortion  
          procedures were performed. 

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 606
                                                                     Page  
          4


          The beneficiaries of the law, however, were not solely  
          healthcare workers.  Clearly, there are many other categories of  
          workers whose children are subject to retaliatory attacks  
          because of the nature of their work.  For example, the children  
          of public figures are susceptible to fanatical attention and  
          harassment because of their parents' occupation. 

          Indeed, those charged with enforcing our criminal laws-police,  
          sheriffs, prosecutors, defense attorneys, judges and jail/prison  
          guards-confront individuals who harbor vendettas against them on  
          a daily basis.  The most tragic, recent example of the lengths  
          to which some will go is the February killing spree of former  
          Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) officer Christopher Dorner.  
           In his "manifesto," Dorner identified over 50 potential targets  
          and their families, including that of LAPD Captain Phil  
          Tingirides, who served on the board of rights that recommended  
          Dorner's termination from the Department.  Once that threat  
          surfaced, Tingirides' six foster children (the youngest of whom  
          was only 10 years old) were guarded by round-the-clock  
          protection details during the ensuing manhunt.  This horrific  
          case highlights the vulnerability of the children of our law  
          enforcers and the need to provide a strong impediment against  
          such terrorism.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  Yes

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  5/20/13)

          California National Organization for Women
          California Police Chiefs Association
          California State Sheriffs Association
          Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa
          State Coalition of Probation Organizations

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  5/20/13)

          Motion Picture Association of America

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    On behalf of the California State  
          Sheriffs' Association, "we are pleased to support SB 606, which  
          would make it a crime for any person who intentionally harasses  
          the child or ward of any other person because of that person's  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 606
                                                                     Page  
          5

          employment, or attempts to record a child's image or voice, or  
          both, without the written consent of the child's parent or legal  
          guardian, by following the child's activities or lying in wait.

          Unfortunately, children of law enforcement officers have been  
          targeted for harassment and threats of violence due to the  
          employment of their parents.  We are pleased to support this  
          measure that increases the protection of those children."

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    The Motion Picture Association of  
          America states, " the bill, as currently drafted, implicates the  
          First Amendment's protection of free speech since it reaches  
          activity which may occur on public property or public spaces,  
          such as streets, sidewalks, parks, beaches, as well as  
          restaurants, shopping malls, etc.  In addition, a parent may  
          assert there is "no legitimate interest" in a photo of his or  
          her child, and will have a private right of action to attempt to  
          vindicate that position.

          Cameras are ubiquitous; almost anyone with a cellphone is a  
          photographer.  A person taking pictures of his or her child at a  
          sports event, or musical performance could run afoul of the  
          bill's provisions by capturing other children in a photo.  And a  
          tourist who snaps a picture of a celebrity with his or her child  
          could also be prosecuted or sued under this bill." 
           

          JG:d  5/22/13   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****
          












                                                                CONTINUED