BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  SB 606
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 606 (De León)
          As Amended  August 19, 2013
          Majority vote 

           SENATE VOTE  :35-0  
           
           PUBLIC SAFETY       5-0         JUDICIARY           10-0        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Ammiano, Jones-Sawyer,    |Ayes:|Wieckowski, Wagner,       |
          |     |Mitchell, Quirk, Skinner  |     |Alejo, Chau, Dickinson,   |
          |     |                          |     |Garcia, Gorell,           |
          |     |                          |     |Maienschein, Muratsuchi,  |
          |     |                          |     |Stone                     |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

           APPROPRIATIONS      14-0                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Gatto, Bigelow,           |     |                          |
          |     |Bocanegra, Bradford, Ian  |     |                          |
          |     |Calderon, Campos, Eggman, |     |                          |
          |     |Gomez, Hall, Holden, Pan, |     |                          |
          |     |Quirk, Wagner, Weber      |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Increases the penalties for the intentional harassment  
          of a child or ward of another person because of that person's  
          employment, and specifies that conduct occurring during the  
          recording of the child's image or voice is per se harassment if  
          specified conditions occur.  Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Increases the maximum jail time for harassment of a child or  
            ward because of the person's employment from six months in the  
            county jail to a year in the county jail.  

          2)Specifies that conduct occurring during the course of  
            recording a child's image or voice, due to the employment of  
            the child's parent or guardian, without express consent of the  
            child's guardian is per se harassment of a child if that  
            conduct would cause a reasonable child to suffer substantial  
            emotional stress, and actually causes the child to suffer  
            substantial emotional distress.  








                                                                  SB 606
                                                                  Page  2



          3)Increases the maximum fines for harassment of a child as  
            follows: 

             a)   Up to $10,000 for a first offense.  

             b)   Up to $20,000 for a second offense.  

             c)   Up to $30,000 for a third or subsequent offense.  

          4)Creates a civil cause of action for the parent or legal  
            guardian of the child, as specified.  

           EXISTING LAW  :  
           
           1)Provides that it is a misdemeanor for any person to  
            intentionally harass a child because of the employment status  
            of the child's parent or parents.  The offense is punishable  
            by a six month jail term, a $1,000 fine, or both.  A defendant  
            must serve a jail term of at least five days for a second  
            conviction, and at least 30 days for a third or subsequent  
            conviction.  
           
           2)Includes the crime of making a credible threat of death or  
            great bodily injury, which includes the following elements:   
            The defendant made the threat "verbally," in writing or by  
            means of an electronic communication device and with the  
            intent that it be taken as a threat; and it appears that the  
            defendant had the means and intent to carry out the threat  
            such that the victim was placed in sustained fear for his own  
            safety or that of his immediate family.  This crime is an  
            alternate felony-misdemeanor, punishable by a jail term of up  
            to one year, a fine of up to $1,000, or both, or by  
            imprisonment in a state prison for 16 months, two years or  
            three years and a fine of up to $10,000.  
           
           3)Defines the crime of "stalking" as repeatedly harassing or  
            following another person in conjunction with the making of a  
            credible threat against that person or his or her immediate  
            family.  Stalking is an alternate felony-misdemeanor  
            punishable by up to one year in the county jail and/or a fine  
            of up to $1,000, or by imprisonment in state prison for 16  
            months, two or three years, and/or a fine of up to $10,000.  
           








                                                                 SB 606
                                                                  Page  3


           4)Provides that a person who has "suffered harassment" may seek  
            a temporary restraining order and an injunction to prevent  
            such harassment.  "Harassment" is defined thus:  "[U]nlawful  
            violence, a credible threat of violence, or a knowing and  
            willful course of conduct directed at a specific person that  
            seriously alarms, annoys, or harasses the person, and that  
            serves no legitimate purpose.  The course of conduct must be  
            such as would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial  
            emotional distress, and must actually cause substantial  
            emotional distress to the plaintiff."  
           
           5)Provides that an employer may seek a temporary restraining  
            order and injunction on behalf of an employee who has been  
            harassed at work through unlawful violence or a credible  
            threat of violence.  In the discretion of the court, the order  
            and injunction can be applied to additional employees and  
            workplaces of the employer.  
           
          FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee:

          1)Unknown, likely minor state trial court costs as a result of  
            creating a new cause of action.

          2)Unknown, likely minor, if any, nonreimbursable local  
            incarceration costs, offset to a degree by increased fine  
            revenue.   

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author "Senate Bill 606 expands upon  
          and improves current law by increasing the penalties for the  
          intentional harassment of a child because of his or her parents'  
          employment. In 1994, AB 3592 (Umberg) was passed to address the  
          increased harassment faced by the children of health care  
          facility employees where abortion procedures were performed. 

          "The beneficiaries of the law, however, were not solely  
          healthcare workers. Certainly, the children of many other  
          categories of workers may become targets of retaliatory attacks  
          because of the nature of their parents' work. Undeniably, the  
          children of public figures are often the victims of fanatical  
          attention and harassment. And those charged with enforcing our  
          laws-police officers, judges, attorneys-must daily confront  
          individuals who may harbor vendettas against not only them, but  
          also their families.








                                                                  SB 606
                                                                  Page  4


          "Although AB 3592 has been on the books for nearly 20 years,  
          children continue to fall prey to intentional harassment because  
          the law provided for relatively weak penalties. No child,  
          regardless of his or her parent's occupation, should be  
          subjected to such unwarranted and harmful persecution. 

          "By setting mandatory minimum terms and authorizing fines of up  
          to $10,000 for repeated violations, SB 606 will have a  
          significant deterrent effect on those who would consider  
          tormenting the most vulnerable and defenseless members of our  
          society."

          Please see the policy committee analysis for a full discussion  
          of this bill.
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :    Gabriel Caswell / PUB. S. / (916)  
          319-3744 


                                                                FN: 0001845