BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        SB 615|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                    THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 615
          Author:   Galgiani (D)
          Amended:  4/1/13
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE LABOR & INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE  :  3-1, 4/24/13
          AYES:  Lieu, Leno, Yee
          NOES:  Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Padilla

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  5-2, 5/23/13
          AYES:  De Le�n, Hill, Lara, Padilla, Steinberg
          NOES:  Walters, Gaines


           SUBJECT  :    Public works:  prevailing wages

           SOURCE  :     State Building and Construction Trades Council


           DIGEST  :    This bill expands the definition of public works, for  
          purposes of  prevailing wage payment requirements, to also  
          include any construction, alteration, demolition, installation,  
          or repair work done under private contract on a hospital or  
          health care facility project when the project is paid for in  
          whole or in part with the proceeds of conduit revenue bonds, as  
          defined.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law requires that workers employed on  
          public works projects in California be paid the applicable  
          prevailing wage, as determined by the director of the Department  
          of Industrial Relations (DIR), and that the body awarding a  
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 615
                                                                     Page  
          2

          contract for a public works project assure compliance with this  
          requirement.  

          Among other things, existing law regarding "public works"  
          projects:

          1.Requires that not less than the general prevailing rate of per  
            diem wages be paid to all workers employed on a "public works"  
            project costing over $1,000 dollars and imposes misdemeanor  
            penalties for violation of this requirement. 

          2.Defines "public work" to include, among other things,  
            construction, alteration, demolition, installation or repair  
            work done under contract and paid for, in whole or in part,  
            out of public funds. 

          3.Defines "paid for in whole or in part out of public funds" to  
            include, among other things, fees, costs, rents, insurance or  
            bond premiums, loans, interest rates, or other obligations  
            normally required in the execution of a contract that are  
            paid, reduced, charged at less than fair market value, waived  
            or forgiven by the state or political subdivision. 

          4.Exempts from the definition of "paid for in whole or in part  
            out of public funds" specified types of affordable housing,  
            private residential housing, private development projects,  
            qualified residential projects, low income housing projects,  
            state manufacturing tax credits, and single family residential  
            projects.

          Existing law, Government Code Section 5870, provides the  
          following definitions:

          1."Conduit financing provider" means any county, city, city and  
            county, public district, public authority, public corporation,  
            nonprofit corporation, joint powers authority, or other  
            statutorily constituted public entity that issues one or more  
            conduit revenue bonds. 

          2."Conduit revenue bond" means any municipal security the  
            proceeds of which are loaned to any nongovernmental borrower,  
            including, but not limited to, persons, for-profit  
            corporations, nonprofit corporations pursuant to Internal  
            Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3), partnerships, and other legal  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 615
                                                                     Page  
          3

            entities for purposes that are permitted for qualified private  
            activity bonds under applicable federal law.
           
           This bill expands the definition of "public works," for purposes  
          of  prevailing wage payment requirements, to also include any  
          construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair  
          work done under private contract on a hospital or health care  
          facility project when the project is paid for in whole or in  
          part with the proceeds of conduit revenue bonds, as defined.

           Comments
           
           Conduit revenue bonds  .  Bonds that are issued for the purpose of  
          making loans to entities other than state or local governments  
          are commonly referred to as "conduit bonds" or "conduit issues,"  
          and state or local governments which issue these bonds are  
          commonly referred to as "conduit issuers."  ("Your  
          Responsibilities as a Conduit Issuer of Tax-Exempt Bonds,"  
          Publication 5005 (4-2012) Catalog #59471F, Department of the  
          Treasury, Internal Revenue Service)  According to the Internal  
          Revenue Service, a conduit issuer in a conduit bond financing  
          typically issues the bonds and loans the bond proceeds to a  
          conduit borrower.  A conduit borrower is generally responsible  
          for the payment of debt service on the conduit bond issue and is  
          usually contractually obligated to maintain the tax-exempt  
          status of the bonds.    

          The California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank  
          (I-Bank), housed within the California Business, Transportation  
          and Housing Agency, is the state's only general purpose  
          financing authority whose mission is to finance public  
          infrastructure and private development that promote a healthy  
          climate for jobs, contribute to a strong economy and improve the  
          quality of life in California communities.  The I-Bank  
          facilitates access to funding from private capital markets  
          through its Conduit Revenue Bond Financing Program, which  
          provides tax-exempt bond funding for eligible economic  
          development facility projects located throughout the state.  The  
          bonds are repaid by the private sector borrower, and are not a  
          debt of the I-Bank or the State of California.  

          According to the I-Banks annual activity report from fiscal year  
          2011-12, I-Bank issued $867,856,500 of conduit revenue bonds for  
          qualified California manufacturing companies, 501(c)(3)  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 615
                                                                     Page  
          4

          nonprofit entities and for other governmental entities to  
          create/retain jobs in the state, to facilitate research and  
          cultural endeavors and for other public purposes. 

          A Los Angeles Times article from 2011 reported that conduits had  
          grown roughly three times faster than the general municipal  
          market over the last five years, according to data from Thomson  
          Reuters, a New York data firm; $84 billion of these bonds were  
          issued in 2010 alone.  ('Conduit' muni bond defaults draws  
          scrutiny, June 14, 2011)  According to the article, investors do  
          not have to pay taxes on their interest from municipal bonds,  
          enabling companies to borrow money at lower interest rates than  
          they could get on their own.  The article notes that although  
          conduits account for roughly 20% of all municipal bonds, they  
          have been responsible for about 70% of all defaults in the  
          municipal bond market in recent years, according to the Income  
          Securities Advisors, a Florida research firm.

           Prior Legislation
           
          SB 975 (Alarcon, Chapter 938, Statutes of 2001) declared  
          legislative intent that projects financed through Industrial  
          Development Bonds issued by the I-Bank must comply with existing  
          laws pertaining to prevailing wages.  Additionally, the bill  
          established a definition for "public funds" and included  
          "installation" in the existing definition of "public works." 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  Yes

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, this bill  
          increases the number of public works projects.  Consequently,  
          the DIR would likely experience additional workload related to  
          the administration and enforcement of California prevailing wage  
          law.  The number of future health facility construction projects  
          subject to this bill is unknown; however, if the additional  
          workload to DIR required a new position, total costs (salary,  
          benefits and equipment expenses) could be as high as $100,000.

          The Compliance Monitoring Unit (CMU) is the component within DIR  
          that monitors and enforces prevailing wage requirements on  
          public works projects. It is currently funded through a  
          combination of (1) the General Fund, (2) a special fund loan,  
          and (3) a quarter of 1% surcharge on state issuances of general  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 615
                                                                     Page  
          5

          obligation (GO) bonds.  Because this bill concerns conduit  
          revenue bonds, not GO bonds, their issuance will not fund the  
          CMU.  Consequently, any increased costs to DIR resulting from  
          the bill could lead to a potential General Fund cost pressure. 

          Additionally, the bill could impact revenues to the California  
          Health Facilities Financing Authority (CHFFA).  Specifically,  
          revenues to CHFFA could be either higher or lower, depending on  
          future CHFFA conduit bond.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  5/24/13)

          State Building and Construction Trades Council (source) 
          California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO


           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The author's office states that the  
          proposed changes with this bill, add conduit bond financing to  
          the types of subsidies that trigger prevailing wage coverage,  
          thereby recognizing that public funds (through foregone tax  
          revenues) are being used to subsidize the project.  

          According to the author's office, conduit revenue bond financing  
          is a method by which the public subsidizes a private development  
          project.  A public entity acts as the "issuer" of the bonds so  
          the interest payments on the bonds will be tax-exempt to the  
          bondholders under the income tax code.  Because the bondholders  
          will not be taxed on the interest, they are willing to accept a  
          lower return on their investment, and the cost of borrowing is  
          lower.  The bond proceeds are transferred to a private  
          developer, which is responsible for making the payments to the  
          bondholders.  The public entity issuing the bonds acts purely as  
          a "conduit" - it does not receive the bond proceeds or pay back  
          the bondholders.  But the tax code looks to the form of the  
          transaction, not its substance, so the interest on the bonds is  
          still tax-exempt to the bondholders.  The public thereby  
          subsidizes the private development project by foregoing the tax  
          revenues that would otherwise be paid by the bondholders.

          According to the author's office, due to the fact that private  
          entities utilize these bonds to save money in interest payments,  
          it makes sense to ensure that any work being paid for by  
          proceeds from conduit bonds should, at the very least, go  
          towards providing a livable wage for the construction workers  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 615
                                                                     Page  
          6

          building the projects that the bonds fund.  Additionally, they  
          argue, the prevailing wage ensures that the most skilled and  
          qualified workers build these complex medical facilities.

          According to the proponents, this bill will close a loophole in  
          state law by requiring healthcare companies electing to receive  
          tax-exempt conduit bond financing from a public agency to pay  
          construction workers the prevailing wage and therefore attract  
          the most competent and skilled local workforce to build these  
          complex medical facilities.  


          PQ:nk  5/24/13   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****




























                                                                CONTINUED