Amended in Senate April 18, 2013

Senate BillNo. 626


Introduced by Senator Beall

February 22, 2013


An act to amend Sectionsbegin insert 75,end insert 4600,begin insert 4604.5,end insert 4610, 4610.6, 4616, and 4660.1 of the Labor Code, relating to workers’ compensation.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SB 626, as amended, Beall. Workers’ compensation.

begin insert

Existing law establishes a worker’s compensation system, administered by the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers’ Compensation, to compensate an employee for injuries sustained in the course of his or her employment. Existing law creates the Commission on Health and Safety and Workers’ Compensation consisting of 8 voting members, that includes 4 voting members representing organized labor and 4 voting members representing employers.

end insert
begin insert

This bill would increase the number of commission voting members to 10 by adding one voting member representing injured workers and one additional voting member representing employers, appointed by the Governor.

end insert

Existingbegin delete law establishes a worker’s compensation system, administered by the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers’ Compensation, to compensate an employee for injuries sustained in the course of his or her employment. Existingend delete law generally provides for the reimbursement of medical providers for services rendered in connection with the treatment of a worker’s injury. Existing law authorizes, with some exceptions, the employee to be treated by a physician of his or her own choice or at a facility of his or her own choice after 30 days from the date the injury is reported. Existing law prohibits a chiropractor from being the treating physician after the employee has received the maximum number of chiropractic visits.

This bill would delete thatbegin delete provision and would instead provide that a physician, as defined, may remain the patient’s primary treating physician even if additional treatment has been denied as long as the physician complies with specified reporting requirementsend deletebegin insert prohibitionend insert.

begin insert

Existing law requires that the recommended guidelines set forth in the medical treatment utilization schedule adopted by the administrative director be presumptively correct on the issue of extent and scope of medical treatment. Notwithstanding the medical treatment utilization schedule, for injuries occurring on and after January 1, 2004, an employee is entitled to no more than 24 chiropractic, 24 occupational therapy, and 24 physical therapy visits per industrial injury.

end insert
begin insert

This bill would delete the limitation on chiropractic, occupational therapy, and physical therapy visits per industrial injury.

end insert

Existing law requires an employer to establish a medical treatment utilization review process and, in this regard, prohibits any person other than a licensed physician from modifying, delaying, or denying requests for authorization of medical treatment for reasons of medical necessity to cure and relieve. Existing law also provides for an independent medical review process to resolve disputes over a utilization review decision for injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2013, and for any decision that is communicated to the requesting physician on or after July 1, 2013, regardless of the date of injury.

This bill would revise these provisions to require that medical treatment utilization reviews and independent medical reviews be conducted by physicians or medical professionals, as applicable, who hold the same California license as the requesting physician. The bill would delete the requirement thatbegin insert anend insert independent medical review organization keep the names of the reviewers confidential in all communications with entities or individuals outside the independent medical review organization.

Existing law prohibits a workers’ compensation administrative law judge, the appeals board, or any higher court from making a determination of medical necessity contrary to the determination of the independent medical review organization.

This bill would delete that provision.

Existing law provides certain methods for determining workers’ compensation benefits payable to a worker or his or her dependents for purposes of permanent partial disability and permanent total disability for injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2013. Existing law requires that the nature of the physical injury or disfigurement, the occupation of the injured employee, and his or her age at the time of injury be taken into account in determining the percentages of permanent partial disability or permanent total disability. Existing law, with some exceptions, prohibits increases in impairment ratings for sleep dysfunction, sexual dysfunction, or psychiatric disorder, or any combination thereof, as specified.

This bill would delete the prohibition on increases in impairment ratings for psychiatric disorder and would make related changes.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: begin deleteno end deletebegin insertyesend insert. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P3    1begin insert

begin insertSECTION 1.end insert  

end insert

begin insertSection 75 of the end insertbegin insertLabor Codeend insertbegin insert is amended to read:end insert

2

75.  

(a) There is in the department the Commission on Health
3and Safety and Workers’ Compensation. The commission shall be
4composed ofbegin delete eightend deletebegin insert 10end insert voting members. Four voting members shall
5represent organized labor,begin insert one voting member shall represent
6injured workers,end insert
andbegin delete fourend deletebegin insert fiveend insert voting members shall represent
7 employers. Not more than one employer member shall represent
8public agencies.begin delete Twoend deletebegin insert Threeend insert of the employerbegin delete andend deletebegin insert members,end insert two of
9the labor membersbegin insert, and the member representing injured workersend insert
10 shall be appointed by the Governor. The Senate Committee on
11Rules and the Speaker of the Assembly shall each appoint one
12employer and one labor representative. The public employer
13representative shall be appointed by the Governor. No action of
14the commission shall be valid unless agreed to by a majority of
15the membership and by not less than two members representing
16organized labor and two members representing employers.

17(b) The commission shall select one of the members representing
18organized labor to chair the commission during the 1994 calendar
19year, and thereafter the commission shall alternatively select an
20employer and organized labor representative to chair the
21commission for one-year terms.

22(c) The initial terms of the members of the commission shall
23be four years, and they shall hold office until the appointment of
24a successor. However, the initial terms of one employer and one
25labor member appointed by the Governor shall expire on December
P4    131, 1995; the initial terms of the members appointed by the Senate
2Committee on Rules shall expire December 31, 1996; the initial
3terms of the members appointed by the Speaker of the Assembly
4shall expire on December 31, 1997; and the initial term of one
5employer and one labor member appointed by the Governor shall
6expire on December 31, 1998. Any vacancy shall be filled by
7appointment to the unexpired term.

8(d) The commission shall meet every other month and upon the
9call of the chair. Meetings shall be open to the public. Members
10of the commission shall receive one hundred dollars ($100) for
11each day of their actual attendance at meetings of the commission
12and other official business of the commission and shall also receive
13their actual and necessary traveling expenses incurred in the
14performance of their duty as a member. Payment of per diem and
15traveling expenses shall be made from the Workers’ Compensation
16Administration Revolving Fund, when appropriated by the
17Legislature.

18

begin deleteSECTION 1.end delete
19begin insertSEC. 2.end insert  

Section 4600 of the Labor Code is amended to read:

20

4600.  

(a) Medical, surgical, chiropractic, acupuncture, and
21hospital treatment, including nursing, medicines, medical and
22surgical supplies, crutches, and apparatuses, including orthotic and
23prosthetic devices and services, that is reasonably required to cure
24or relieve the injured worker from the effects of his or her injury
25shall be provided by the employer. In the case of his or her neglect
26or refusal reasonably to do so, the employer is liable for the
27reasonable expense incurred by or on behalf of the employee in
28providing treatment.

29(b) As used in this division and notwithstanding any other
30provision of law, medical treatment that is reasonably required to
31cure or relieve the injured worker from the effects of his or her
32injury means treatment that is based upon the guidelines adopted
33by the administrative director pursuant to Section 5307.27.

34(c) Unless the employer or the employer’s insurer has
35established or contracted with a medical provider network as
36provided for in Section 4616, after 30 days from the date the injury
37is reported, the employee may be treated by a physician of his or
38her own choice or at a facility of his or her own choice within a
39reasonable geographic area. begin delete A physician, as defined in Section
403209.3, may remain the employee’s primary treating physician
P5    1even if additional medical treatment, as specified in the medical
2treatment utilization schedule adopted under Section 5307.27, has
3been denied, as long as the physician complies with the reporting
4requirements set forth by the administrative director.end delete

5(d) (1) If an employee has notified his or her employer in
6writing prior to the date of injury that he or she has a personal
7physician, the employee shall have the right to be treated by that
8physician from the date of injury if the employee has health care
9coverage for nonoccupational injuries or illnesses on the date of
10injury in a plan, policy, or fund as described in subdivisions (b),
11(c), and (d) of Section 4616.7.

12(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), a personal physician shall
13meet all of the following conditions:

14(A) Be the employee’s regular physician and surgeon, licensed
15pursuant to Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000) of Division
162 of the Business and Professions Code.

17(B) Be the employee’s primary care physician and has
18previously directed the medical treatment of the employee, and
19who retains the employee’s medical records, including his or her
20medical history. “Personal physician” includes a medical group,
21if the medical group is a single corporation or partnership
22composed of licensed doctors of medicine or osteopathy, which
23operates an integrated multispecialty medical group providing
24comprehensive medical services predominantly for
25nonoccupational illnesses and injuries.

26(C) The physician agrees to be predesignated.

27(3) If the employee has health care coverage for nonoccupational
28injuries or illnesses on the date of injury in a health care service
29plan licensed pursuant to Chapter 2.2 (commencing with Section
301340) of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, and the
31employer is notified pursuant to paragraph (1), all medical
32treatment, utilization review of medical treatment, access to
33medical treatment, and other medical treatment issues shall be
34governed by Chapter 2.2 (commencing with Section 1340) of
35Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code. Disputes regarding the
36provision of medical treatment shall be resolved pursuant to Article
375.55 (commencing with Section 1374.30) of Chapter 2.2 of
38Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code.

39(4) If the employee has health care coverage for nonoccupational
40injuries or illnesses on the date of injury in a group health insurance
P6    1policy as described in Section 4616.7, all medical treatment,
2utilization review of medical treatment, access to medical
3treatment, and other medical treatment issues shall be governed
4by the applicable provisions of the Insurance Code.

5(5) The insurer may require prior authorization of any
6nonemergency treatment or diagnostic service and may conduct
7reasonably necessary utilization review pursuant to Section 4610.

8(6) An employee shall be entitled to all medically appropriate
9referrals by the personal physician to other physicians or medical
10providers within the nonoccupational health care plan. An
11employee shall be entitled to treatment by physicians or other
12medical providers outside of the nonoccupational health care plan
13pursuant to standards established in Article 5 (commencing with
14Section 1367) of Chapter 2.2 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety
15Code.

16(e) (1) When at the request of the employer, the employer’s
17insurer, the administrative director, the appeals board, or a workers’
18compensation administrative law judge, the employee submits to
19examination by a physician, he or she shall be entitled to receive,
20in addition to all other benefits herein provided, all reasonable
21expenses of transportation, meals, and lodging incident to reporting
22for the examination, together with one day of temporary disability
23indemnity for each day of wages lost in submitting to the
24examination.

25(2) Regardless of the date of injury, “reasonable expenses of
26transportation” includes mileage fees from the employee’s home
27to the place of the examination and back at the rate of twenty-one
28cents ($0.21) a mile or the mileage rate adopted by the Director
29of Human Resources pursuant to Section 19820 of the Government
30Code, whichever is higher, plus any bridge tolls. The mileage and
31tolls shall be paid to the employee at the time he or she is given
32notification of the time and place of the examination.

33(f) When at the request of the employer, the employer’s insurer,
34the administrative director, the appeals board, or a workers’
35compensation administrative law judge, an employee submits to
36examination by a physician and the employee does not proficiently
37speak or understand the English language, he or she shall be
38entitled to the services of a qualified interpreter in accordance with
39conditions and a fee schedule prescribed by the administrative
40director. These services shall be provided by the employer. For
P7    1purposes of this section, “qualified interpreter” means a language
2interpreter certified, or deemed certified, pursuant to Article 8
3(commencing with Section 11435.05) of Chapter 4.5 of Part 1 of
4Division 3 of Title 2 of, or Section 68566 of, the Government
5Code.

6(g) If the injured employee cannot effectively communicate
7with his or her treating physician because he or she cannot
8proficiently speak or understand the English language, the injured
9employee is entitled to the services of a qualified interpreter during
10medical treatment appointments. To be a qualified interpreter for
11purposes of medical treatment appointments, an interpreter is not
12required to meet the requirements of subdivision (f), but shall meet
13any requirements established by rule by the administrative director
14that are substantially similar to the requirements set forth in Section
151367.04 of the Health and Safety Code. The administrative director
16shall adopt a fee schedule for qualified interpreter fees in
17accordance with this section. Upon request of the injured employee,
18the employer or insurance carrier shall pay for interpreter services.
19An employer shall not be required to pay for the services of an
20interpreter who is not certified or is provisionally certified by the
21person conducting the medical treatment or examination unless
22either the employer consents in advance to the selection of the
23individual who provides the interpreting service or the injured
24worker requires interpreting service in a language other than the
25languages designated pursuant to Section 11435.40 of the
26Government Code.

27(h) Home health care services shall be provided as medical
28treatment only if reasonably required to cure or relieve the injured
29employee from the effects of his or her injury and prescribed by
30a physician and surgeon licensed pursuant to Chapter 5
31(commencing with Section 2000) of Division 2 of the Business
32and Professions Code, and subject to Section 5307.1 or 5703.8.
33The employer shall not be liable for home health care services that
34are provided more than 14 days prior to the date of the employer’s
35receipt of the physician’s prescription.

36begin insert

begin insertSEC. 3.end insert  

end insert

begin insertSection 4604.5 of the end insertbegin insertLabor Codeend insertbegin insert is amended to read:end insert

37

4604.5.  

(a) The recommended guidelines set forth in the
38medical treatment utilization schedule adopted by the
39administrative director pursuant to Section 5307.27 shall be
40presumptively correct on the issue of extent and scope of medical
P8    1treatment. The presumption is rebuttable and may be controverted
2by a preponderance of the scientific medical evidence establishing
3that a variance from the guidelines reasonably is required to cure
4or relieve the injured worker from the effects of his or her injury.
5The presumption created is one affecting the burden of proof.

6(b) The recommended guidelines set forth in the schedule
7adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) shall reflect practices that are
8evidence and scientifically based, nationally recognized, and peer
9reviewed. The guidelines shall be designed to assist providers by
10offering an analytical framework for the evaluation and treatment
11of injured workers, and shall constitute care in accordance with
12Section 4600 for all injured workers diagnosed with industrial
13conditions.

begin delete

14(c) (1) Notwithstanding the medical treatment utilization
15schedule, for injuries occurring on and after January 1, 2004, an
16employee shall be entitled to no more than 24 chiropractic, 24
17occupational therapy, and 24 physical therapy visits per industrial
18injury.

19(2) (A) Paragraph (1) shall not apply when an employer
20authorizes, in writing, additional visits to a health care practitioner
21for physical medicine services. Payment or authorization for
22treatment beyond the limits set forth in paragraph (1) shall not be
23deemed a waiver of the limits set forth by paragraph (1) with
24respect to future requests for authorization.

25(B) The Legislature finds and declares that the amendments
26made to subparagraph (A) by the act adding this subparagraph are
27declaratory of existing law.

28(3) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to visits for postsurgical
29physical medicine and postsurgical rehabilitation services provided
30in compliance with a postsurgical treatment utilization schedule
31established by the administrative director pursuant to Section
325307.27.

33(d)

end delete

34begin insert(c)end insert For all injuries not covered by the official utilization schedule
35adopted pursuant to Section 5307.27, authorized treatment shall
36be in accordance with other evidence-based medical treatment
37guidelines that are recognized generally by the national medical
38community and scientifically based.

39

begin deleteSEC. 2.end delete
40begin insertSEC. 4.end insert  

Section 4610 of the Labor Code is amended to read:

P9    1

4610.  

(a) For purposes of this section, “utilization review”
2means utilization review or utilization management functions that
3prospectively, retrospectively, or concurrently review and approve,
4modify, delay, or deny, based in whole or in part on medical
5necessity to cure and relieve, treatment recommendations by
6physicians, as defined in Section 3209.3, prior to, retrospectively,
7or concurrent with the provision of medical treatment services
8pursuant to Section 4600.

9(b) Every employer shall establish a utilization review process
10in compliance with this section, either directly or through its insurer
11or an entity with which an employer or insurer contracts for these
12services.

13(c) Each utilization review process shall be governed by written
14policies and procedures. These policies and procedures shall ensure
15that decisions based on the medical necessity to cure and relieve
16of proposed medical treatment services are consistent with the
17schedule for medical treatment utilization adopted pursuant to
18Section 5307.27. These policies and procedures, and a description
19of the utilization process, shall be filed with the administrative
20director and shall be disclosed by the employer to employees,
21physicians, and the public upon request.

22(d) If an employer, insurer, or other entity subject to this section
23requests medical information from a physician in order to
24determine whether to approve, modify, delay, or deny requests for
25authorization, the employer shall request only the information
26reasonably necessary to make the determination. The employer,
27insurer, or other entity shall employ or designate a medical director
28who holds an unrestricted license to practice medicine in this state
29issued pursuant to Section 2050 or Section 2450 of the Business
30and Professions Code. The medical director shall ensure that the
31process by which the employer or other entity reviews and
32approves, modifies, delays, or denies requests by physicians prior
33to, retrospectively, or concurrent with the provision of medical
34treatment services, complies with the requirements of this section.
35Nothing in this section shall be construed as restricting the existing
36authority of the Medical Board of California.

37(e) No person other than a physician who holds the same
38California license as that held by the requesting physician who is
39competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the
40medical treatment services, and where these services are within
P10   1the scope of the physician’s practice, requested by the physician
2may modify, delay, or deny requests for authorization of medical
3treatment for reasons of medical necessity to cure and relieve.

4(f) The criteria or guidelines used in the utilization review
5process to determine whether to approve, modify, delay, or deny
6medical treatment services shall be all of the following:

7(1) Developed with involvement from actively practicing
8physicians.

9(2) Consistent with the schedule for medical treatment utilization
10adopted pursuant to Section 5307.27.

11(3) Evaluated at least annually, and updated if necessary.

12(4) Disclosed to the physician and the employee, if used as the
13basis of a decision to modify, delay, or deny services in a specified
14case under review.

15(5) Available to the public upon request. An employer shall
16only be required to disclose the criteria or guidelines for the
17specific procedures or conditions requested. An employer may
18charge members of the public reasonable copying and postage
19expenses related to disclosing criteria or guidelines pursuant to
20this paragraph. Criteria or guidelines may also be made available
21through electronic means. No charge shall be required for an
22employee whose physician’s request for medical treatment services
23is under review.

24(g) In determining whether to approve, modify, delay, or deny
25requests by physicians prior to, retrospectively, or concurrent with
26the provisions of medical treatment services to employees all of
27the following requirements shall be met:

28(1) Prospective or concurrent decisions shall be made in a timely
29fashion that is appropriate for the nature of the employee’s
30condition, not to exceed five working days from the receipt of the
31information reasonably necessary to make the determination, but
32in no event more than 14 days from the date of the medical
33treatment recommendation by the physician. In cases where the
34review is retrospective, a decision resulting in denial of all or part
35of the medical treatment service shall be communicated to the
36individual who received services, or to the individual’s designee,
37within 30 days of receipt of information that is reasonably
38necessary to make this determination. If payment for a medical
39treatment service is made within the time prescribed by Section
P11   14603.2, a retrospective decision to approve the service need not
2otherwise be communicated.

3(2) When the employee’s condition is such that the employee
4faces an imminent and serious threat to his or her health, including,
5but not limited to, the potential loss of life, limb, or other major
6bodily function, or the normal timeframe for the decisionmaking
7 process, as described in paragraph (1), would be detrimental to the
8employee’s life or health or could jeopardize the employee’s ability
9to regain maximum function, decisions to approve, modify, delay,
10or deny requests by physicians prior to, or concurrent with, the
11provision of medical treatment services to employees shall be made
12in a timely fashion that is appropriate for the nature of the
13employee’s condition, but not to exceed 72 hours after the receipt
14of the information reasonably necessary to make the determination.

15(3) (A) Decisions to approve, modify, delay, or deny requests
16by physicians for authorization prior to, or concurrent with, the
17provision of medical treatment services to employees shall be
18communicated to the requesting physician within 24 hours of the
19decision. Decisions resulting in modification, delay, or denial of
20all or part of the requested health care service shall be
21communicated to physicians initially by telephone or facsimile,
22and to the physician and employee in writing within 24 hours for
23concurrent review, or within two business days of the decision for
24prospective review, as prescribed by the administrative director.
25If the request is not approved in full, disputes shall be resolved in
26accordance with Section 4610.5, if applicable, or otherwise in
27accordance with Section 4062.

28(B) In the case of concurrent review, medical care shall not be
29discontinued until the employee’s physician has been notified of
30the decision and a care plan has been agreed upon by the physician
31that is appropriate for the medical needs of the employee. Medical
32care provided during a concurrent review shall be care that is
33medically necessary to cure and relieve, and an insurer or
34self-insured employer shall only be liable for those services
35determined medically necessary to cure and relieve. If the insurer
36or self-insured employer disputes whether or not one or more
37services offered concurrently with a utilization review were
38medically necessary to cure and relieve, the dispute shall be
39resolved pursuant to Section 4610.5, if applicable, or otherwise
40pursuant to Section 4062. Any compromise between the parties
P12   1that an insurer or self-insured employer believes may result in
2payment for services that were not medically necessary to cure
3and relieve shall be reported by the insurer or the self-insured
4employer to the licensing board of the provider or providers who
5received the payments, in a manner set forth by the respective
6board and in such a way as to minimize reporting costs both to the
7board and to the insurer or self-insured employer, for evaluation
8as to possible violations of the statutes governing appropriate
9professional practices. No fees shall be levied upon insurers or
10self-insured employers making reports required by this section.

11(4) Communications regarding decisions to approve requests
12by physicians shall specify the specific medical treatment service
13approved. Responses regarding decisions to modify, delay, or deny
14medical treatment services requested by physicians shall include
15a clear and concise explanation of the reasons for the employer’s
16decision, a description of the criteria or guidelines used, and the
17clinical reasons for the decisions regarding medical necessity. If
18a utilization review decision to deny or delay a medical service is
19due to incomplete or insufficient information, the decision shall
20specify the reason for the decision and specify the information that
21is needed.

22(5) If the employer, insurer, or other entity cannot make a
23decision within the timeframes specified in paragraph (1) or (2)
24because the employer or other entity is not in receipt of all of the
25information reasonably necessary and requested, because the
26employer requires consultation by an expert reviewer, or because
27the employer has asked that an additional examination or test be
28performed upon the employee that is reasonable and consistent
29with good medical practice, the employer shall immediately notify
30the physician and the employee, in writing, that the employer
31cannot make a decision within the required timeframe, and specify
32the information requested but not received, the expert reviewer to
33be consulted, or the additional examinations or tests required. The
34employer shall also notify the physician and employee of the
35anticipated date on which a decision may be rendered. Upon receipt
36of all information reasonably necessary and requested by the
37employer, the employer shall approve, modify, or deny the request
38for authorization within the timeframes specified in paragraph (1)
39or (2).

P13   1(6) A utilization review decision to modify, delay, or deny a
2treatment recommendation shall remain effective for 12 months
3from the date of the decision without further action by the employer
4with regard to any further recommendation by the same physician
5for the same treatment unless the further recommendation is
6supported by a documented change in the facts material to the
7basis of the utilization review decision.

8(7) Utilization review of a treatment recommendation shall not
9be required while the employer is disputing liability for injury or
10treatment of the condition for which treatment is recommended
11pursuant to Section 4062.

12(8) If utilization review is deferred pursuant to paragraph (7),
13and it is finally determined that the employer is liable for treatment
14of the condition for which treatment is recommended, the time for
15the employer to conduct retrospective utilization review in
16accordance with paragraph (1) shall begin on the date the
17determination of the employer’s liability becomes final, and the
18time for the employer to conduct prospective utilization review
19shall commence from the date of the employer’s receipt of a
20treatment recommendation after the determination of the
21employer’s liability.

22(h) Every employer, insurer, or other entity subject to this section
23shall maintain telephone access for physicians to request
24authorization for health care services.

25(i) If the administrative director determines that the employer,
26insurer, or other entity subject to this section has failed to meet
27any of the timeframes in this section, or has failed to meet any
28other requirement of this section, the administrative director may
29assess, by order, administrative penalties for each failure. A
30proceeding for the issuance of an order assessing administrative
31penalties shall be subject to appropriate notice to, and an
32opportunity for a hearing with regard to, the person affected. The
33administrative penalties shall not be deemed to be an exclusive
34remedy for the administrative director. These penalties shall be
35deposited in the Workers’ Compensation Administration Revolving
36Fund.

37

begin deleteSEC. 3.end delete
38begin insertSEC. 5.end insert  

Section 4610.6 of the Labor Code is amended to read:

39

4610.6.  

(a) Upon receipt of a case pursuant to Section 4610.5,
40an independent medical review organization shall conduct the
P14   1review in accordance with this article and any regulations or orders
2of the administrative director. The organization’s review shall be
3limited to an examination of the medical necessity of the disputed
4medical treatment.

5(b) Upon receipt of information and documents related to a case,
6the medical reviewer or reviewers selected to conduct the review
7by the independent medical review organization shall promptly
8review all pertinent medical records of the employee, provider
9reports, and any other information submitted to the organization
10or requested from any of the parties to the dispute by the reviewers.
11If the reviewers request information from any of the parties, a copy
12of the request and the response shall be provided to all of the
13parties. The reviewer or reviewers shall also review relevant
14information related to the criteria set forth in subdivision (c).

15(c) Following its review, the reviewer or reviewers shall
16determine whether the disputed health care service was medically
17necessary based on the specific medical needs of the employee
18and the standards of medical necessity as defined in subdivision
19(c) of Section 4610.5.

20(d) The organization shall complete its review and make its
21determination in writing, and in layperson’s terms to the maximum
22extent practicable, within 30 days of the receipt of the request for
23review and supporting documentation, or within less time as
24prescribed by the administrative director. If the disputed medical
25treatment has not been provided and the employee’s provider or
26the administrative director certifies in writing that an imminent
27and serious threat to the health of the employee may exist,
28including, but not limited to, serious pain, the potential loss of life,
29limb, or major bodily function, or the immediate and serious
30deterioration of the health of the employee, the analyses and
31determinations of the reviewers shall be expedited and rendered
32within three days of the receipt of the information. Subject to the
33approval of the administrative director, the deadlines for analyses
34and determinations involving both regular and expedited reviews
35may be extended for up to three days in extraordinary
36circumstances or for good cause.

37(e) The medical professionals’ analyses and determinations shall
38state whether the disputed health care service is medically
39necessary. Each analysis shall cite the employee’s medical
40condition, the relevant documents in the record, and the relevant
P15   1findings associated with the provisions of subdivision (c) to support
2the determination. If more than one medical professional reviews
3the case, the recommendation of the majority shall prevail. If the
4medical professionals reviewing the case are evenly split as to
5whether the disputed health care service should be provided, the
6decision shall be in favor of providing the service.

7(f) The independent medical review organization shall provide
8the administrative director, the employer, the employee, and the
9employee’s provider with the analyses and determinations of the
10medical professionals reviewing the case, and a description of the
11qualifications of the medical professionals. Independent medical
12reviews shall be conducted by medical professionals who hold the
13same California license as the requesting physician. If more than
14one medical professional reviewed the case and the result was
15differing determinations, the independent medical review
16organization shall provide each of the separate reviewer’s analyses
17and determinations.

18(g) The determination of the independent medical review
19organization shall be deemed to be the determination of the
20administrative director and shall be binding on all parties.

21(h) A determination of the administrative director pursuant to
22this section may be reviewed only by a verified appeal from the
23medical review determination of the administrative director, filed
24with the appeals board for hearing pursuant to Chapter 3
25(commencing with Section 5500) of Part 4 and served on all
26interested parties within 30 days of the date of mailing of the
27determination to the aggrieved employee or the aggrieved
28employer. The determination of the administrative director shall
29be presumed to be correct and shall be set aside only upon proof
30by clear and convincing evidence of one or more of the following
31grounds for appeal:

32(1) The administrative director acted without or in excess of the
33administrative director’s powers.

34(2) The determination of the administrative director was
35procured by fraud.

36(3) The independent medical reviewer was subject to a material
37conflict of interest that is in violation of Section 139.5.

38(4) The determination was the result of bias on the basis of race,
39national origin, ethnic group identification, religion, age, sex,
40sexual orientation, color, or disability.

P16   1(5) The determination was the result of a plainly erroneous
2express or implied finding of fact, provided that the mistake of
3fact is a matter of ordinary knowledge based on the information
4submitted for review pursuant to Section 4610.5 and not a matter
5that is subject to expert opinion.

6(i) If the determination of the administrative director is reversed,
7the dispute shall be remanded to the administrative director to
8submit the dispute to independent medical review by a different
9independent review organization. In the event that a different
10independent medical review organization is not available after
11remand, the administrative director shall submit the dispute to the
12original medical review organization for review by a different
13reviewer in the organization.

14(j) Upon receiving the determination of the administrative
15director that a disputed health care service is medically necessary,
16the employer shall promptly implement the decision as provided
17by this section unless the employer has also disputed liability for
18any reason besides medical necessity. In the case of reimbursement
19for services already rendered, the employer shall reimburse the
20provider or employee, whichever applies, within 20 days, subject
21to resolution of any remaining issue of the amount of payment
22pursuant to Sections 4603.2 to 4603.6, inclusive. In the case of
23services not yet rendered, the employer shall authorize the services
24within five working days of receipt of the written determination
25from the independent medical review organization, or sooner if
26appropriate for the nature of the employee’s medical condition,
27and shall inform the employee and provider of the authorization.

28(k) Failure to pay for services already provided or to authorize
29services not yet rendered within the time prescribed by subdivision
30(l) is a violation of this section and, in addition to any other fines,
31penalties, and other remedies available to the administrative
32director, the employer shall be subject to an administrative penalty
33in an amount determined pursuant to regulations to be adopted by
34the administrative director, not to exceed five thousand dollars
35($5,000) for each day the decision is not implemented. The
36administrative penalties shall be paid to the Workers’
37Compensation Administration Revolving Fund.

38(l) The costs of independent medical review and the
39administration of the independent medical review system shall be
40borne by employers through a fee system established by the
P17   1administrative director. After considering any relevant information
2on program costs, the administrative director shall establish a
3reasonable, per-case reimbursement schedule to pay the costs of
4independent medical review organization reviews and the cost of
5administering the independent medical review system, which may
6vary depending on the type of medical condition under review and
7on other relevant factors.

8(m) The administrative director may publish the results of
9 independent medical review determinations after removing
10individually identifiable information.

11(n) If any provision of this section, or the application thereof to
12any person or circumstances, is held invalid, the remainder of the
13section, and the application of its provisions to other persons or
14circumstances, shall not be affected thereby.

15

begin deleteSEC. 4.end delete
16begin insertSEC. 6.end insert  

Section 4616 of the Labor Code is amended to read:

17

4616.  

(a) (1) On or after January 1, 2005, an insurer, employer,
18or entity that provides physician network services may establish
19or modify a medical provider network for the provision of medical
20treatment to injured employees. The network shall include
21physicians primarily engaged in the treatment of occupational
22injuries. The administrative director shall encourage the integration
23of occupational and nonoccupational providers. The number of
24physicians in the medical provider network shall be sufficient to
25enable treatment for injuries or conditions to be provided in a
26timely manner. The provider network shall include an adequate
27number and type of physicians, as described in Section 3209.3, or
28other providers, as described in Section 3209.5, to treat common
29injuries experienced by injured employees based on the type of
30occupation or industry in which the employee is engaged, and the
31geographic area where the employees are employed.

32(2) Medical treatment for injuries shall be readily available at
33reasonable times to all employees. To the extent feasible, all
34medical treatment for injuries shall be readily accessible to all
35employees. With respect to availability and accessibility of
36treatment, the administrative director shall consider the needs of
37rural areas, specifically those in which health facilities are located
38at least 30 miles apart and areas in which there is a health care
39shortage.

P18   1(3) Commencing January 1, 2014, a treating physician shall be
2included in the network only if, at the time of entering into or
3renewing an agreement by which the physician would be in the
4network, the physician, or an authorized employee of the physician
5or the physician’s office, provides a separate written
6acknowledgment in which the physician affirmatively elects to be
7a member of the network. Copies of the written acknowledgment
8shall be provided to the administrative director upon the
9administrative director’s request. This paragraph shall not apply
10to a physician who is a shareholder, partner, or employee of a
11medical group that elects to be part of the network.

12(4) Commencing January 1, 2014, every medical provider
13network shall post on its Internet Web site a roster of all treating
14physicians in the medical provider network and shall update the
15roster at least quarterly. Every network shall provide to the
16administrative director the Internet Web site address of the network
17and of its roster of treating physicians. The administrative director
18shall post, on the division’s Internet Web site, the Internet Web
19site address of every approved medical provider network.

20(5) Commencing January 1, 2014, every medical provider
21network shall provide one or more persons within the United States
22to serve as medical access assistants to help an injured employee
23find an available physician of the employee’s choice, and
24subsequent physicians if necessary, under Section 4616.3. Medical
25access assistants shall have a toll-free telephone number that
26injured employees may use and shall be available at least from 7
27a.m. to 8 p.m. Pacific Standard Time, Monday through Saturday,
28inclusive, to respond to injured employees, contact physicians’
29offices during regular business hours, and schedule appointments.
30The administrative director shall promulgate regulations on or
31before July 1, 2013, governing the provision of medical access
32assistants.

33(b) (1) An insurer, employer, or entity that provides physician
34network services shall submit a plan for the medical provider
35network to the administrative director for approval. The
36administrative director shall approve the plan for a period of four
37years if he or she determines that the plan meets the requirements
38of this section. If the administrative director does not act on the
39plan within 60 days of submitting the plan, it shall be deemed
40approved. Commencing January 1, 2014, existing approved plans
P19   1shall be deemed approved for a period of four years from the most
2recent application or modification approval date. Plans for
3reapproval for medical provider networks shall be submitted at
4least six months before the expiration of the four-year approval
5period. Upon a showing that the medical provider network was
6approved or deemed approved by the administrative director, there
7shall be a conclusive presumption on the part of the appeals board
8that the medical provider network was validly formed.

9(2) Every medical provider network shall establish and follow
10procedures to continuously review the quality of care, performance
11of medical personnel, utilization of services and facilities, and
12costs.

13(3) Every medical provider network shall submit geocoding of
14its network for reapproval to establish that the number and
15geographic location of physicians in the network meets the required
16access standards.

17(4) The administrative director shall at any time have the
18discretion to investigate complaints and to conduct random reviews
19of approved medical provider networks.

20(5) Approval of a plan may be denied, revoked, or suspended
21if the medical provider network fails to meet the requirements of
22this article. Any person contending that a medical provider network
23is not validly constituted may petition the administrative director
24to suspend or revoke the approval of the medical provider network.
25 The administrative director may adopt regulations establishing a
26schedule of administrative penalties not to exceed five thousand
27dollars ($5,000) per violation, or probation, or both, in lieu of
28revocation or suspension for less severe violations of the
29requirements of this article. Penalties, probation, suspension, or
30revocation shall be ordered by the administrative director only
31after notice and opportunity to be heard. Unless suspended or
32revoked by the administrative director, the administrative director’s
33approval of a medical provider network shall be binding on all
34persons and all courts. A determination of the administrative
35director may be reviewed only by an appeal of the determination
36of the administrative director filed as an original proceeding before
37the reconsideration unit of the workers’ compensation appeals
38board on the same grounds and within the same time limits after
39issuance of the determination as would be applicable to a petition
P20   1for reconsideration of a decision of a workers’ compensation
2administrative law judge.

3(c) Physician compensation may not be structured in order to
4achieve the goal of reducing, delaying, or denying medical
5treatment or restricting access to medical treatment.

6(d) If the employer or insurer meets the requirements of this
7section, the administrative director may not withhold approval or
8disapprove an employer’s or insurer’s medical provider network
9based solely on the selection of providers. In developing a medical
10provider network, an employer or insurer shall have the exclusive
11right to determine the members of their network.

12(e) All treatment provided shall be provided in accordance with
13the medical treatment utilization schedule established pursuant to
14Section 5307.27.

15(f) No person other than a physician who holds the same
16California license as the requesting physician who is competent
17to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the medical
18treatment services, when these services are within the scope of the
19physician’s practice, may modify, delay, or deny requests for
20authorization of medical treatment.

21(g) Commencing January 1, 2013, every contracting agent that
22sells, leases, assigns, transfers, or conveys its medical provider
23networks and their contracted reimbursement rates to an insurer,
24employer, entity that provides physician network services, or
25another contracting agent shall, upon entering or renewing a
26provider contract, disclose to the provider whether the medical
27provider network may be sold, leased, transferred, or conveyed to
28other insurers, employers, entities that provide physician network
29services, or another contracting agent, and specify whether those
30insurers, employers, entities that provide physician network
31services, or contracting agents include workers’ compensation
32insurers.

33(h) On or before November 1, 2004, the administrative director,
34in consultation with the Department of Managed Health Care, shall
35adopt regulations implementing this article. The administrative
36director shall develop regulations that establish procedures for
37purposes of making medical provider network modifications.

38

begin deleteSEC. 5.end delete
39begin insertSEC. 7.end insert  

Section 4660.1 of the Labor Code is amended to read:

P21   1

4660.1.  

This section shall apply to injuries occurring on or
2after January 1, 2013.

3(a) In determining the percentages of permanent partial or
4permanent total disability, account shall be taken of the nature of
5the physical injury or disfigurement, the occupation of the injured
6employee, and his or her age at the time of injury.

7(b) For purposes of this section, the “nature of the physical
8injury or disfigurement” shall incorporate the descriptions and
9measurements of physical impairments and the corresponding
10percentages of impairments published in the American Medical
11Association (AMA) Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent
12Impairment (5th edition) with the employee’s whole person
13impairment, as provided in the guides, multiplied by an adjustment
14factor of 1.4.

15(c) There shall be no increases in impairment ratings for sleep
16dysfunction or sexual dysfunction, or both, arising out of a
17compensable physical injury. Nothing in this section shall limit
18the ability of an injured employee to obtain treatment for sleep
19dysfunction or sexual dysfunction, if any, that are a consequence
20of an industrial injury.

21(d) The administrative director may formulate a schedule of age
22and occupational modifiers and may amend the schedule for the
23determination of the age and occupational modifiers in accordance
24with this section. The Schedule for Rating Permanent Disabilities
25pursuant to the American Medical Association (AMA) Guides to
26the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (5th edition) and the
27schedule of age and occupational modifiers shall be available for
28public inspection and, without formal introduction in evidence,
29shall be prima facie evidence of the percentage of permanent
30disability to be attributed to each injury covered by the schedule.
31Until the schedule of age and occupational modifiers is amended,
32for injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2013, permanent
33disabilities shall be rated using the age and occupational modifiers
34in the permanent disability rating schedule adopted as of January
351, 2005.

36(e) The schedule of age and occupational modifiers shall
37promote consistency, uniformity, and objectivity.

38(f) The schedule of age and occupational modifiers and any
39amendment thereto or revision thereof shall apply prospectively
40and shall apply to and govern only those permanent disabilities
P22   1that result from compensable injuries received or occurring on and
2after the effective date of the adoption of the schedule, amendment,
3or revision, as the case may be.

4(g) Nothing in this section shall preclude a finding of permanent
5total disability in accordance with Section 4662.

6(h) In enacting the act adding this section, it is not the intent of
7the Legislature to overrule the holding in Milpitas Unified School
8District v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (Guzman) (2010) 187
9Cal.App.4th 808.

10(i) The Commission on Health and Safety and Workers’
11Compensation shall conduct a study to compare average loss of
12earnings for employees who sustained work-related injuries with
13permanent disability ratings under the schedule, and shall report
14the results of the study to the appropriate policy and fiscal
15committees of the Legislature no later than January 1, 2016.



O

    98