BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �






                         SENATE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
                                Carol Liu, Chair
                           2013-2014 Regular Session
                                        

          BILL NO:       SB 681
          AUTHOR:        Hernandez
          AMENDED:       April 1, 2013
          FISCAL COMM:   No             HEARING DATE:  May 1, 2013
          URGENCY:       No             CONSULTANT:Kathleen Chavira

           SUBJECT  :  Community college districts personal property  
          contracting.
          
           SUMMARY  

          This bill expands the authority of a community college  
          district to "piggyback" on an existing contract between a  
          public corporation or agency (including any county, city,  
          town, or district) and a vendor for the lease or purchase  
          of personal property by authorizing the district to  
          directly purchase from, and make payments to, the vendor.

           BACKGROUND  

          Current law establishes various procedures to be followed  
          by the community colleges to secure bids or proposals and  
          enter into contracts for the acquisition of goods and  
          services. (Education Code � 81641, � 81644, � 81645)

          Notwithstanding these provisions, community colleges are  
          authorized, under specified conditions to authorize any  
          public corporation or agency, including any county, city,  
          town, or district, to lease data-processing equipment,  
          purchase materials, supplies, equipment, automotive  
          vehicles, tractors, and other personal property for the  
          district in the manner in which the public corporation or  
          agency is authorized by law to make the leases or  
          purchases, without advertising for bids, and to make  
          payments to the public corporation or agency for furnishing  
          the services incidental to the lease or purchase of the  
          personal property.
          (Public Contract Code �20652)

          Current law provides the same authority as that outlined  
          for community colleges above to school districts. However,  




                                                                SB 681
                                                                Page 2



          current law also provides that, if there is an existing  
          contract between a public corporation or agency and a  
          vendor for the lease or purchase of the personal property,  
          a school district may authorize the lease or purchase of  
          personal property directly from the vendor and make payment  
          to the vendor under the same terms that are available to  
          the public corporation or agency under the contract.  
          (Public Contract Code � 20118)

           ANALYSIS
           
           This bill  expands the authority of a community college  
          district to "piggyback" on an existing contract between a  
          public corporation or agency (including any county, city,  
          town, or district) and a vendor for the lease or purchase  
          of personal property by clarifying that, like school  
          districts, the community college district can purchase  
          directly from, and make payments directly to, the vendor,  
          without needing to go through the original contracting  
          agency.

           STAFF COMMENTS  

           1)   Piggyback?  The term "piggyback" is associated with  
               Public Contract Code Section 20118, which allows  
               school districts to acquire personal property by  
               participating in an existing contract of another  
               public entity. According to districts, piggybacking  
               can save months of time and significant costs as  
               districts, in order to go out for bid, must prepare  
               documents, advertise for bid, obtain local board  
               approval and place award. 

               While the statute clearly applies to the acquisition  
               of personal property, in the past, questions have  
               arisen in regards to its use for facilities related  
               purchases, as school districts were using "piggyback"  
               contracts to acquire and install factory-built modular  
               building components that result in permanent school  
               facilities funded by the School Facility Program  
               (SFP).  At the request of the State Allocation Board,  
               the Attorney General issued an opinion in January 2006  
               which found that:

               a)        A school district may not, without  
                    advertising for bids, contract with another  




                                                                SB 681
                                                                Page 3



                    public agency to acquire factory-built modular  
                    building components for installation on a  
                    permanent foundation.

               b)        A school district intending to contract for  
                    the construction, reconstruction, renovation,  
                    improvement or repair of any school building,  
                    where the work will require an expenditure of  
                    $15,000 or more, must follow a competitive  
                    bidding process. 

               c)        Once these modular components have been  
                    attached at the building site, and after  
                    significant on-site finish work has been  
                    completed, they would result in permanent school  
                    buildings of varying dimensions, purpose; and  
                    architectural styles i.e. they are no longer  
                    personal property.

           2)   Parallel language  . Current law authorizes both  
               community colleges and school districts to "piggyback"  
               onto existing contracts between vendors and public  
               corporations or agencies.  In 2006, the Legislature  
               clarified that this school district authority extended  
               to allowing a school district, without being listed or  
               referenced on the original contract, to be included  
               without the originating public agency needing to  
               secure agreement from the vendor that the contract  
               could be "piggybacked." This change in the law allowed  
               for the benefits of piggybacking without having to go  
               through the original contracting agency to buy and  
               then transfer the item, authorizing school districts  
               to work directly with the vendor. This bill would  
               extend this same ability to community college  
               districts.


           SUPPORT  

          Kern Community College District
          Los Angeles Community College District
          Los Rios Community College District
          Peralta Community College District
          Rio Hondo Community College District

           OPPOSITION




                                                                SB 681
                                                                Page 4




           None received