BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 684| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- UNFINISHED BUSINESS Bill No: SB 684 Author: Hill (D) Amended: 9/6/13 Vote: 27 - Urgency SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE : 10-0, 4/30/13 AYES: DeSaulnier, Gaines, Beall, Cannella, Galgiani, Hueso, Lara, Liu, Roth, Wyland NO VOTE RECORDED: Pavley SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : Senate Rule 28.8 SENATE FLOOR : 34-0, 05/20/13 AYES: Anderson, Beall, Berryhill, Block, Calderon, Cannella, Corbett, Correa, De León, DeSaulnier, Emmerson, Evans, Fuller, Gaines, Galgiani, Hancock, Hernandez, Hill, Hueso, Huff, Jackson, Knight, Leno, Liu, Monning, Nielsen, Padilla, Steinberg, Torres, Walters, Wolk, Wright, Wyland, Yee NO VOTE RECORDED: Lara, Lieu, Pavley, Price, Roth, Vacancy ASSEMBLY FLOOR : Not available SUBJECT : Outdoor Advertising Act: former redevelopment agency project areas SOURCE : California Sign Association League of California Cities DIGEST : This bill amends the redevelopment agency (RDA) exemption to the Outdoor Advertising Act (OAA) to reflect the CONTINUED SB 684 Page 2 elimination of redevelopment agencies. Assembly Amendments (1) add language to specify if a federal agency provides notice that the operation of a display will result in the reduction of federal aid highway funds, then the authorization of that display shall cease and the display owner shall remove all advertising copy from the display within 60 days after the state notifies the display owner of the receipt of the federal notice or be subject to a civil fine; (2) add language to require the local jurisdiction annually, by December 31, certify to the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) certain information related to the display; (3) add language to specify that if the local jurisdiction fails to ensure that the displays remains in conformance after 30 days of receipt of a written notice from Caltrans, the local jurisdiction shall hold Caltrans harmless and indemnify it for all costs incurred for compliance enforcement; and (4) define "good cause" as specified. ANALYSIS : Redevelopment Agencies . Historically, the Community Redevelopment Law allowed a local government to establish a redevelopment area and capture all of the increase in property taxes generated within the area over a period of decades. These tax revenues were intended to address the blighted nature of a project area, and if used effectively, therefore, should have eventually ended the blight and become unnecessary. Because of this, over time these project areas were given expiration dates, generally up to 40 years following their inception, until which they were able to collect tax revenues and pay off debt. In 2011, the Legislature enacted AB 26X1 (Blumenfield, Chapter 5, Statutes of 2011-12 , First Extraordinary Session). The bill eliminated redevelopment agencies and established procedures for winding down the agencies, paying off enforceable obligations, and disposing of agency assets. In addition, the bill established successor agencies, typically the city that established the agency, to take control of all RDA assets, properties, and other items of value. Successor agencies are to dispose of an agency's assets as directed by an oversight board, made up of representatives of local taxing entities, with the proceeds transferred to the county auditor-controller for distribution to taxing agencies within each county. CONTINUED SB 684 Page 3 OAA . The OAA regulates the size, illumination, orientation, and location of advertising displays adjacent to and within specified distances of interstate or primary highways, and, with some exceptions, specifically prohibits any advertising display from being placed or maintained on property adjacent to a section of landscaped highway. The OAA generally does not apply to "on premise" advertising displays, which include those advertising the sale of the property upon which it is placed or that advertise the business conducted, services rendered, or goods produced or sold on the property. Local government regulates on-premise displays, except for certain safety requirements. Existing law includes a number of exceptions to the OAA and assigns the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) the responsibility of reviewing and permitting signs which qualify for these exceptions. Under the OAA, displays advertising those businesses and activities within the boundaries of an individual RDA project area are considered on-premise displays for an initial period of 10 years or until the project area expires, whichever occurs first. Caltrans may for good cause extend the permits for these signs beyond the initial 10 years, but not beyond the life of the redevelopment project. This bill: 1. Allows an existing advertising display to be considered on-premise if the display: A. Advertises those businesses and activities developed within the former RDA project area boundaries, as those boundaries existed on December 29, 2011; B. Is located within the boundary limits of the project; C. Was constructed before January 1, 2012; D. Does not cause the reduction in federal aid highway funds. 2. Authorizes, on and after January 1, 2022, the applicable city, county, or city and county to request, for good cause, CONTINUED SB 684 Page 4 from the Caltrans an extension beyond January 1, 2023, not to exceed the expiration of the redevelopment project area. 3. Defines "good cause" as satisfying all of the following: A. There has been a finding by the applicable city, county, or city and county that the advertising display has had a positive economic impact on the redevelopment project area and provides a public benefit. B. There have been no violations by the display owner or operator of this section or of any applicable illumination standards in the previous 10 years that have not been corrected within 30 days of the date of mailing of a violation notice to the owner or operator by Caltrans. C. There has been compliance by the owner and operator with all other standards adopted by the applicable city, county, or city and county, or by Caltrans. 4. Specifies that the applicable city, county, or city and county shall be responsible for ensuring these advertising displays are advertising qualifying businesses, are otherwise being operated lawfully, and remain in the public's best interest, but does specify that nothing in this provision shall be construed to preclude any enforcement authority by Caltrans. 5. Clarifies that if the United States Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration, or any other applicable federal agency to the state provide notice that the operation of that display will result in the reduction of federal aid highway funds, then the authorization of that display shall cease and the display owner shall remove all advertising copy from the display within 60 days after the state notifies the display owner of the receipt of the federal notice 6. Specifies that failure to remove the advertising copy, as specified, shall result in a civil fine of $10,000 per day until the advertising copy is removed. 7. Specifies that Caltrans shall not assume any liability in connection with the cessation of operation or removal of an CONTINUED SB 684 Page 5 advertising display. 8. Clarifies that if the owner or operator of the display is not indicted on the display, the state is only required to send the notice to the applicable city, county, or city and county. 9. Clarifies that an advertising display may remain until January 1, 2023, after which date the display shall be removed, unless it otherwise qualifies as a lawful advertising display, without the payment of any compensation to the owner or operator. 10.Specifies that the applicable city, county, or city and county shall annually, by December 31, certify to Caltrans that the advertising copy of the advertising display is advertising businesses or activities operating within the boundaries of the redevelopment project area and that at least 10% of the advertising copy, up to a maximum of 100 square feet, is used to display the address or location of the business or activity, or to identify the route to the business or activity from the nearest freeway off-ramp. 11.Allows Caltrans to independently review certification compliance. 12.Specifies that that an advertising display shall be removed if it is in violation more than three times within a 10-year period and the violation has not been corrected within 30 days of the date of mailing of a violation notice to the owner or operator by Caltrans. 13.Specifies that the city, county, or city and county fails to ensure that the displays remain in conformance with all provisions of the ordinance and this bill after 30 days of receipt of a written notice from Caltrans, the city, county, or city and county shall hold the department harmless and indemnify Caltrans for all costs incurred by Caltrans to ensure compliance with the ordinance and this bill or to defend actions challenging the adoption of the ordinance allowing displays. Background CONTINUED SB 684 Page 6 Generally speaking, local governments established RDA project areas in blighted areas that required some additional investment to address the blight. In theory, the investment should eventually turn the neighborhood around and at some point no longer be necessary. As mentioned earlier, this theory led the Legislature to assign expiration dates to all redevelopment areas, expecting them either to achieve success and no longer be needed or acknowledge the problems are not resolvable through increased investment alone. According to proponents, legislation created the redevelopment exemption to the OAA to allow businesses in these less-desirable places to advertise for two reasons. First, travelers on the landscaped freeway who may have been reluctant to frequent the businesses in the area because of the perceived blight would consider doing so as redevelopment investment helped address the blight issues. Second, this new advertising opportunity could be an additional tool to help a struggling business in the project area become more successful. In either case, the theory behind the expiration of the redevelopment areas seems to hold true with the expiration of the OAA exemption. At some point, either the blighted area has improved to the point that the businesses no longer need the unique competitive advantage provided by the sign or the problems are too large for the signs to resolve. Permits in a "post-redevelopment" world . As mentioned earlier, Caltrans enforces the OAA, which includes activities such as maintaining a list of landscaped freeways, issuing permits for signs allowed by statute to exist, and fining owners of non-compliant signs. Caltrans has issued 95 permits for advertising displays along landscaped freeways in redevelopment project areas throughout the state. Many of these signs are currently or will soon be in existence longer than 10 years and therefore have permits which need to be extended. With the elimination of redevelopment agencies, however, Caltrans has been unsure how to proceed and has not extended any permits. Neither has Caltrans issued any fines to sign owners with expired permits. Instead, Caltrans has indicated that it is waiting for further direction from the Legislature regarding the state's position on these sign permits. FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: Yes CONTINUED SB 684 Page 7 SUPPORT : (Verified 9/10/13) California Sign Association (co-source) League of California Cities (co-source) Avant Outdoor Advertising California New Car Dealers Association California Professional Association of Specialty Contractors California State Association of Counties Cities of Huntington Beach, Inglewood, and Southgate OPPOSITION : (Verified 9/10/13) California State Outdoor Advertising Association ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : According to the author's office, this bill addresses an issue inadvertently created when the Legislature eliminated redevelopment agencies. Existing law allows Caltrans to permit advertising displays as on-premises displays within redevelopment project areas for a period of 10 years and includes the possibility of extending those permits. Now that the Legislature eliminated redevelopment agencies, there is no mechanism to extend the permits for these signs. This bill amends current law to allow these signs to continue to function as on-premise displays and remain so as long as was expected before the elimination of redevelopment. The League of California Cities states "Prior to the elimination of redevelopment agencies, advertising displays were exempted from the Outdoor Advertising Act and considered to be on the premise anywhere within the limits of the redevelopment area. The ability of the signs to receive an extension was contingent upon approval of the redevelopment agency and CalTrans. One of the unintended consequences of the elimination of redevelopment is that approval for the extension of these signs is impossible since there is no redevelopment agency to consent. This bill simply seeks to clarify that the existing redevelopment signs can continue with agreement of the designated agency and CalTrans." ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION : California State Outdoor Advertising Association (CSOAA) states this bill allows sign operators within former RDA projects to evade regulation under the OAA and compete unfairly against CSOAA member companies. CSOAA states CONTINUED SB 684 Page 8 this bill could prove disastrous for the State of California. CSOAA believes this bill promotes the improper use of offsite advertising displays in RDA projects as purported "on-premises" signs. In so doing, this bill violates regulations adopted pursuant to the federal Highway Beautification Act, 23 United States Code Section 131. Such violations could result in the loss of 10% of California's federal highway funding. JA:k 9/10/13 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END **** CONTINUED