BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SB 716
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   August 21, 2013

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                      SB 716 (Lara) - As Amended:  May 28, 2013

          Policy Committee:                             Public  
          SafetyVote:4-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable:              Yes

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires state, local and private correctional  
          facilities to create a safe environment free from sexual abuse  
          for inmates or detainees by adopting policies implementing the  
          U.S. Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA), which are currently  
          binding on state and local facilities. 

          PREA, a lengthy and prescriptive act that establishes a  
          zero-tolerance standard for prison rape, requires all adult  
          prisons and jails, lockups, community confinement facilities,  
          juvenile facilities and immigrant detention centers to fully  
          comply with regulations crafted to prevent, detect and respond  
          to all forms of sexual abuse and sexual harassment. PREA  
          prescribes staffing levels, timelines, training, investigative  
          procedures, education and surveillance. PREA specifies a state  
          that does not certify full compliance with PREA standards is  
          subject to the loss of five percent of any U.S. DOJ grant for  
          prison purposes. 

          Specifically, this bill:

          1)Repeals several sections in the state's Sexual Abuse in  
            Detention Elimination Act (AB 550, Goldberg, Statutes of  
            2005), replacing them with references to federal requirements.  


          2)Requires full implementation of these policies by July 1,  
            2015.

          3)Provides that on or before July 1, 2015, the agency,  
            department, or company shall certify in writing to the Board  








                                                                  SB 716
                                                                  Page  2

            of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) that it has adopted  
            the required policies, and shall transmit its policies and  
            procedures electronically to BSCC.

          4)Requires BSCC to:

             a)   Make these policies available to the public on a  
               website, in a timely manner.

             b)   Provide a way for the public to raise concerns about  
               these published policies. Upon receipt of concerns from a  
               member of the public, the board has 90 days to review the  
               relevant policies. Any concerns by the public shall be  
               raised by July 1, 2015.

             c)   Notify any entity if its policies or procedures do not  
               meet the requirements of this bill and that it intends to  
               reject the entity's certification. The entity receiving  
               this notification has 180 days to modify its policies. If,  
               after the 180-day period, BSCC finds that the policies and  
               procedures are still inadequate, it shall reject the  
               certification. 

          5)Requires audits of all facilities at least once every three  
            years, and requires BSCC to publish audit procedures  
            consistent with the requirements under federal regulations.  
            Requires BSCC to produce a standard audit report format and to  
            maintain a list of California-certified auditors. Creates a  
            procedure for expedited audits of facilities suspected of a  
            pattern and practice of sexual abuse.

          6)Requires correctional entities to collect uniform data for  
            every allegation of sexual abuse, aggregate the data annually,  
            make it publicly available, and retain it for at least 10  
            years. 

          7)Requires an agency or entity that contracts with a facility  
            not covered under the provisions of this bill to modify its  
            contract or agreement to incorporate the policies or  
            procedures implementing the federal standards referenced in  
            this measure.

          8)Establishes the following financial penalties for failure to  
            provide certification of compliance, failure to perform the  
            required audits, or failure to address an audit:  








                                                                  SB 716
                                                                  Page  3


             a)   Public entities will be subject to a 25% reduction of  
               BSCC-administered grant renewals or awards in the first  
               year of noncompliance, a 50% reduction in the second year,  
               and complete ineligibility in the third year.  

             b)   Private entities will be assessed a $500 penalty by BSCC  
               on the first day the certification or audit is due or a  
               failed audit is reported to BSCC, and an additional $1,000  
               every seven days until it provides a valid certification or  
               completes successful audits of any facilities that are  
               delinquent for or have failed an audit.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)Significant one-time GF costs to the BSCC, in the range of  
            $1.5 million to establish a major new program that includes  
            (a) reviewing the policies and procedures of hundreds of  
            custodial facilities statewide and issuing compliance and  
            non-compliance certification; (b) creating a program to  
            provide public review and response regarding state and local  
            policies; and (c) establishing auditing procedures, policies,  
            and a list of approved auditors.   

          2)Significant ongoing GF costs to BSCC, in the range of $1  
            million, to administer the program.  

          3)Unknown significant ongoing reimbursable state-mandated costs  
            to counties and cities, in the millions of dollars, for local  
            custodial facilities to comply with the requirements of this  
            bill. Just the state-mandated audits of hundreds of county  
            jails, city jails, temporary holding area, juvenile halls,  
            camps and ranches, every three years will create costs in the  
            millions of dollars. Moreover, because this bill creates a  
            state mandate to create, implement and operate a sex abuse  
            program, much of which is in process pursuant to federal law,  
            including written plans, data collection, audits, and  
            disciplinary sanctions, counties and cities will be able to  
            file claims with the Commission on State Mandates for millions  
            of dollars of staffing and program costs.

            For example, several counties have indicated they will pursue  
            significant mandate claims for staffing, particularly for PREA  
            coordinators at each facility, as well as additional deputies  
            and equipment, such as video cameras.








                                                                  SB 716
                                                                  Page  4


          4)Costs to CDCR to comply with the federal requirements should  
            not be significant, as existing state law and practice is  
            generally compliant with federal requirements for state  
            prisons. 
           
          COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale  . The author's intent is to "update existing state  
            law" to require custody facilities to conform to federal  
            standards regarding custodial safety. 

           2)Current state law  includes the Sexual Abuse in Detention  
            Elimination Act (AB 550, Goldberg, Statutes of 2005), which  
            was intended to prepare the state for the federal PREA. AB 550  
            required specific practices designed to prevent sexual  
            violence, such as inmate classification and housing  
            procedures, response and investigation protocols, protection  
            of inmates who file complaints, sexual abuse reporting  
            recording protocols, creation of the Office of the Sexual  
            Abuse in Detention Elimination Ombudsperson, and requiring the  
            Office of the Inspector General to investigate reports of  
            mishandled sex abuse incidents. 

           3)Current federal law  :

             a)   Establishes the PREA, a lengthy and prescriptive act  
               that establishes a zero-tolerance standard for prison rape,  
               requiring all adult prisons and jails, lockups, community  
               confinement facilities, juvenile facilities and immigrant  
               detention centers to fully comply with regulations crafted  
               to prevent, detect and respond to all forms of sexual abuse  
               and sexual harassment. PREA prescribes staffing levels,  
               timelines, training, investigative procedures, education  
               and surveillance. PREA specifies a state that does not  
               certify full compliance with PREA standards is subject to  
               the loss of five percent of any U.S. DOJ grant for prison  
               purposes. 

             b)   Establishes the National Prison Rape Elimination  
               Commission to carry out a comprehensive study of prison  
               rape, and to recommend national standards, and directs the  
               U.S. Attorney General to publish a final rule adopting  
               national standards for the detection, prevention,  
               reduction, and punishment of prison rape. 








                                                                  SB 716
                                                                  Page  5


             c)   Requires facilities to develop a written plan to  
               coordinate actions by first responders, medical and mental  
               health practitioners, investigators, and facility  
               leadership.

             d)   Creates disciplinary sanctions up to and including  
               termination for staff violating agency sexual abuse or  
               sexual harassment policies.   

             e)   Requires entities to collect accurate, uniform data for  
               every allegation of sexual abuse at facilities under its  
               direct control using a standardized instrument and set of  
               definitions and to aggregate the incident-based sexual  
               abuse data at least annually.   

             f)   Requires entities to audit each facility at least once  
               during each three-year period, beginning on August 20,  
               2013.  

           4)PREA targets abuse in federal, state, and local institutions  .  
            In May 2012, the National Prison Rape Elimination Commission  
            released final standards implementing PREA for adult prisons  
            and jails, lockups, community confinement facilities, and  
            juvenile facilities. Each set of standards is designed to  
            address problems specific to each type of facility.   

            PREA standards became applicable to federal facilities  
            immediately and to state and local facilities on August 20,  
            2012.  The three-year audit cycle is scheduled to begin this  
            month.  Governors must certify compliance or accept a 5%  
            reduction in federal grant funding for each year the state's  
            agencies fail to comply. 

           5)Opposition  includes the CA State Sheriffs Association, The  
            L.A. Sheriff's Office, and the Chief Probation Officers of  
            California, who question why the state needs to redraft  
            existing standards in favor of federal standards that are  
            already binding on state and local facilities, when the result  
            will be a significant state-mandated cost.  According to the  
            State Sheriffs Association:

            "Additional regulations in excess of the federal standards are  
            redundant, as all correctional institutions currently  
            implement standards for the detection, prevention and  








                                                                  SB 716
                                                                  Page  6

            punishment of rape in correctional facilities. Mandating a  
            system of data collection, review and retention, and requiring  
            all agencies to collect accurate, uniform data for at least 10  
            years after the date of initial collection will create  
            significant ongoing costs to entities that do not have the  
            budget or manpower to execute these burdensome requirements." 

            According to the Chief Probation Officers, "Every probation  
            department and every juvenile facility in California is  
            committed to providing each youth under their care a safe,  
            humane, secure environment, free from sexual misconduct and  
            victimization. We believe SB 716 is duplicative of existing  
            federal and state requirements and auditing procedures, and  
            exacerbates efforts underway in this regard."




           Analysis Prepared by  :    Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081