SB 735,
as amended, Wolk. Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Reform Act ofbegin delete 2009: covered actions.end deletebegin insert 2009: multispecies conservation plans.end insert
The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Reform Act of 2009 establishes the Delta Stewardship Council, which is required to develop, adopt, and commence implementation of a comprehensive management plan for the Delta by January 1, 2012.begin delete The act requires a state or local public agency that proposes to undertake a covered action to prepare a written certification, as prescribed, as to whether the covered action is consistent with the Delta Plan. The act defines “covered action” to mean a plan, program, or project that meets specified conditions.end delete
This bill would exclude from the definition of “covered action” the approval or implementation of a conservation plan and implementing agreements submitted, by specified entities, pursuant to the federal Endangered Species Act, the Natural Community Conservation Planning Act, or certain provisions related to the taking, importation, exportation, or sale of endangered or threatened species, or the implementation of conservation measures included in a conservation plan approved, by specified entities, pursuant to these provisions.
end deleteThis bill would require the council, the Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Counties of Contra Costa, Sacramento, and Solano, the Yolo County Habitat/Natural Community Conservation Plan Joint Powers Agency, and the San Joaquin Council of Governments to enter into a memorandum of understanding regarding multispecies conservation plans, as defined, that describes, among other things, how the parties would ensure that multispecies conservation plans that have been adopted or are under development are consistent with the Delta Plan. By imposing this requirement on local public agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
end insertbegin insertThe California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
end insertbegin insertThis bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
end insertVote: majority.
Appropriation: no.
Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: begin deleteno end deletebegin insertyesend insert.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
begin insertSection 85351 is added to the end insertbegin insertWater Codeend insertbegin insert, to
2read:end insert
(a) The council, the Department of Fish and Wildlife,
4the Counties of Contra Costa, Sacramento, and Solano, the Yolo
5County Habitat/Natural Community Conservation Plan Joint
6Powers Agency, and the San Joaquin Council of Governments
7shall, by January 1, 2015, enter into a mutually agreeable
8memorandum of understanding, or other written agreement, as
9appropriate, that describes the following:
10(1) How the parties would ensure that adopted multispecies
11conservation plans are consistent with the Delta Plan, and the
12Delta Plan is consistent with those multispecies conservation plans.
13(2) How the parties would ensure that multispecies conservation
14plans under development are consistent
with the adopted
15multispecies conservation plans, the Delta Plan, and each other.
P3 1(3) How to ensure that all the current multispecies conservation
2plans, future multispecies conservation plans, and the Delta Plan
3are implemented in accord with each other.
4(b) The council shall invite and encourage the United States
5Fish and Wildlife Service to participate in developing and signing
6the agreement pursuant to this section, to the extent authorized
7under federal law.
8(c) For purposes of this section, “multispecies conservation
9plan” means a multispecies conservation plan adopted under
10Section 1539 of the federal Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C.
11Sec. 1531 et seq.), the Natural Community Conservation Planning
12Act (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 2800) of Division 3 of
13the Fish and Game Code), or jointly under both
acts.
If the Commission on State Mandates determines that
15this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to
16local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made
17pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division
184 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
Section 85057.5 of the Water Code is amended
20to read:
(a) “Covered action” means a plan, program, or
22project as defined pursuant to Section 21065 of the Public
23Resources Code that meets all of the following conditions:
24(1) Will occur, in whole or in part, within the boundaries of the
25Delta or Suisun Marsh.
26(2) Will be carried out, approved, or funded by the state or a
27local public agency.
28(3) Is covered by one or more provisions of the Delta Plan.
29(4) Will have a significant impact on achievement of one or
30both of the coequal goals or the implementation of
31government-sponsored flood control programs to reduce risks to
32people,
property, and state interests in the Delta.
33(b) “Covered action” does not include any of the following:
34(1) A regulatory action of a state agency.
35(2) Routine maintenance and operation of the State Water
36Project or the federal Central Valley Project.
37(3) Regional transportation plans prepared pursuant to Section
3865080 of the Government Code.
39(4) A plan, program, project, or activity within the secondary
40zone of the Delta that the applicable metropolitan planning
P4 1organization pursuant to Section 65080 of the Government Code
2has determined is consistent with either a sustainable communities
3strategy or an alternative planning strategy that the State Air
4Resources Board has determined would,
if implemented, achieve
5the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets established by that
6board pursuant to subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision
7(b) of Section 65080 of the Government Code. For purposes of
8this paragraph, “consistent with” means consistent with the use
9designation, density, building intensity, transportation plan, and
10applicable policies specified for the area in the sustainable
11communities strategy or the alternative planning strategy, as
12applicable, and any infrastructure necessary to support the plan,
13program, project, or activity.
14(5) Routine maintenance and operation of a facility located, in
15whole or in part, in the Delta, that is owned or operated by a local
16public agency.
17(6) A plan, program, project, or activity that occurs, in whole
18or in part, in the Delta, if both of the following conditions are met:
19(A) The plan, program, project, or activity is undertaken by a
20local public agency that is located, in whole or in part, in the Delta.
21(B) Either a notice of determination is filed, pursuant to Section
2221152 of the Public Resources Code, for the plan, program, project,
23or activity by, or the plan, program, project, or activity is fully
24permitted by, September 30, 2009.
25(7) (A) A project within the secondary zone, as defined pursuant
26to Section 29731 of the Public Resources Code as of January 1,
272009, for which a notice of approval or determination pursuant to
28Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code has been filed before
29the date on which the Delta Plan becomes effective.
30(B) A project for which a notice of approval or determination
31
is filed on or after the date on which the final Bay Delta
32Conservation Plan becomes effective, and before the date on which
33the Delta Plan becomes effective, is not a covered action but shall
34be consistent with the Bay Delta Conservation Plan.
35(C) Subparagraphs (A) and (B) do not apply to either of the
36following:
37(i) A project that is within a Restoration Opportunity Area as
38shown in Figure 3.1 of Chapter 3: Draft Conservation Strategy of
39the Bay Delta Conservation Plan, August 3, 2009, or as shown in
40a final Bay Delta Conservation Plan.
P5 1(ii) A project that is within the alignment of a conveyance
2facility as shown in Figures 1 to 5, inclusive, of the Final Draft
3Initial Assessment of Dual Delta Water Conveyance Report, April
423, 2008, and in future revisions of this document by the
5department.
6(8) Leases approved by a special district if all of the following
7apply:
8(A) The uses proposed by the lease are authorized by the
9applicable general plan and zoning ordinances of the city where
10the special district is located.
11(B) The uses proposed by the lease are approved by the city
12where the special district is located and the city complies with
13Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 85225) of Part 3, if
14applicable, prior to approval of the lease by the special district.
15(C) The special district complies with the California
16Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section
1721000) of the Public Resources Code) prior to approving the lease.
18(9) (A) Routine
dredging activities that are necessary for
19maintenance of facilities operated by a special district.
20(B) For purposes of this paragraph, “routine dredging activities”
21are limited to the following:
22(i) Dredging to maintain the Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel
23at a depth of 40 feet in the sediment trap at the confluence of the
24San Joaquin River, between river mile 39.3 to river mile 40.2, and
25to maintain the remaining Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel at
26a depth of 35 feet plus 2 feet overdredge from river mile 35 to river
27mile 43.
28(ii) Dredging designed to maintain the Sacramento Deep Water
29Ship Channel at a depth of 30 feet plus 2 feet of overdredge from
30river mile 0.0 to river mile 30, and at a depth of 35 feet from river
31mile 35 to river mile 43.
32(C) Except as provided by this subdivision, it is the intent of
33the Legislature that this exemption shall not be interpreted or
34treated as changing or modifying current substantive and procedural
35regulations applicable to the decision to approve dredging
36operations.
37(10) The approval of a conservation plan and implementing
38agreements submitted by a city, county, special district, or joint
39powers authority consisting of cities or counties, or both, within
P6 1the Counties of Contra Costa, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Solano,
2or Yolo pursuant to any of the following:
3(A) Section 1539 of the federal Endangered Species Act (16
4U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq.).
5(B) The Natural Community Conservation Planning Act
6(Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 2800) of Division 3 of the
7Fish and Game Code).
8(C) Section 2081 of the Fish and Game Code for a conservation
9plan and implementing agreements that are also incorporated in a
10conservation plan pursuant to Section 1539 of the federal
11Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq.).
12(11) The implementation of
conservation measures included in
13a conservation plan approved by a city, county, special district, or
14joint powers authority consisting of cities or counties, or both,
15within the Counties of Contra Costa, Sacramento, San Joaquin,
16Solano, or Yolo pursuant to any of the following:
17(A) Section 1539 of the federal Endangered Species Act (16
18U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq.).
19(B) The Natural Community Conservation Planning Act
20(Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 2800) of Division 3 of the
21Fish and Game Code).
22(C) Section 2081 of the Fish and Game Code for a conservation
23plan and implementing agreements that are also incorporated in a
24conservation plan pursuant to Section 1539 of the federal
25Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq.).
26(c) For purposes of
paragraphs (8) and (9) of subdivision (b),
27“special district” means the Port of Stockton or the Port of West
28Sacramento.
29(d) This section shall not be interpreted to authorize the
30abrogation of a vested right whether created by statute or by
31common law.
O
97